A new approach for modelling uncertainty in expert systems knowledge bases

IF 1.2 4区 计算机科学 Q4 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Archives of Control Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.24425/119075
A. Niederlinski
{"title":"A new approach for modelling uncertainty in expert systems knowledge bases","authors":"A. Niederlinski","doi":"10.24425/119075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current paradigm of modelling uncertainty in expert systems knowledge bases using Certainty Factors (CF) has been critically evaluated. A way to circumvent the awkwardness, non-intuitiveness and constraints encountered while using CF has been proposed. It is based on introducing Data Marks for askable conditions and Data Marks for conclusions of relational models, followed by choosing the best suited way to propagate those Data Marks into Data Marks of rule conclusions. This is done in a way orthogonal to the inference using Aristotelian Logic. Using Data Marks instead of Certainty Factors removes thus the intellectual discomfort caused by rejecting the notion of truth, falsehood and the Aristotelian law of excluded middle, as is done when using the CF methodology. There is also no need for changing the inference system software (expert system shell): the Data Marks approach can be implemented by simply modifying the knowledge base that should accommodate them. The methodology of using Data Marks to model uncertainty in knowledge bases has been illustrated by an example of SWOT analysis of a small electronic company. A short summary of SWOT analysis has been presented. The basic data used for SWOT analysis of the company are discussed. The rmes_EE SWOT knowledge base consisting of a rule base and model base have been presented and explained. The results of forward chaining for this knowledge base have been presented and critically evaluated.","PeriodicalId":48654,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Control Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Control Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/119075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current paradigm of modelling uncertainty in expert systems knowledge bases using Certainty Factors (CF) has been critically evaluated. A way to circumvent the awkwardness, non-intuitiveness and constraints encountered while using CF has been proposed. It is based on introducing Data Marks for askable conditions and Data Marks for conclusions of relational models, followed by choosing the best suited way to propagate those Data Marks into Data Marks of rule conclusions. This is done in a way orthogonal to the inference using Aristotelian Logic. Using Data Marks instead of Certainty Factors removes thus the intellectual discomfort caused by rejecting the notion of truth, falsehood and the Aristotelian law of excluded middle, as is done when using the CF methodology. There is also no need for changing the inference system software (expert system shell): the Data Marks approach can be implemented by simply modifying the knowledge base that should accommodate them. The methodology of using Data Marks to model uncertainty in knowledge bases has been illustrated by an example of SWOT analysis of a small electronic company. A short summary of SWOT analysis has been presented. The basic data used for SWOT analysis of the company are discussed. The rmes_EE SWOT knowledge base consisting of a rule base and model base have been presented and explained. The results of forward chaining for this knowledge base have been presented and critically evaluated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专家系统知识库中不确定性建模的新方法
目前使用确定性因素(CF)在专家系统知识库中建模不确定性的范例已被批判性地评估。已经提出了一种避免使用CF时遇到的尴尬、非直观性和约束的方法。它的基础是为查询条件引入Data Marks,为关系模型的结论引入Data Marks,然后选择最适合的方式将这些Data Marks传播到规则结论的Data Marks中。这是用一种与运用亚里士多德逻辑的推理正交的方式来完成的。因此,使用数据标记代替确定性因素消除了由于拒绝真理、谬误和亚里士多德的排中律的概念而引起的智力上的不适,正如使用CF方法时所做的那样。也不需要更改推理系统软件(专家系统外壳):数据标记方法可以通过简单地修改应该容纳它们的知识库来实现。以某小型电子公司的SWOT分析为例,说明了使用数据标记对知识库中的不确定性进行建模的方法。对SWOT分析进行了简要的总结。讨论了公司SWOT分析的基本数据。提出并说明了由规则库和模型库组成的机电一体化机电一体化SWOT知识库。该知识库的前向链的结果已被提出并进行了批判性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Control Sciences
Archives of Control Sciences Mathematics-Modeling and Simulation
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Control Sciences welcomes for consideration papers on topics of significance in broadly understood control science and related areas, including: basic control theory, optimal control, optimization methods, control of complex systems, mathematical modeling of dynamic and control systems, expert and decision support systems and diverse methods of knowledge modelling and representing uncertainty (by stochastic, set-valued, fuzzy or rough set methods, etc.), robotics and flexible manufacturing systems. Related areas that are covered include information technology, parallel and distributed computations, neural networks and mathematical biomedicine, mathematical economics, applied game theory, financial engineering, business informatics and other similar fields.
期刊最新文献
148878 Admissibility tests for multidimensional singular fractional continuous-time models On-line process identification using the Modulating Functions Method and non-asymptotic state estimation Online continuous-time adaptive predictive control of the technological glass conditioning process Stability analysis and design of state estimated controller for delay fuzzy systems with parameter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1