Typology of substance using offenders of IPV: violence and substance use outcomes

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Advances in Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2018-11-06 DOI:10.1108/ADD-01-2018-0001
Cassandra Berbary, Cory A. Crane, C. Easton
{"title":"Typology of substance using offenders of IPV: violence and substance use outcomes","authors":"Cassandra Berbary, Cory A. Crane, C. Easton","doi":"10.1108/ADD-01-2018-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate whether aggression and substance use assessed during treatment differ based on risk level for substance-using male offenders of intimate partner violence (IPV).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSecondary analyses were conducted using data from Easton et al.’s (2017) study on substance-dependent IPV offenders. A cluster analysis was utilized in order to classify participants into typology groups. Analyses of covariance were conducted in order to determine group differences in aggression and substance use during treatment.\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper provides results-related response to treatment based on offender typology. Results appear to reflect two typology groups with significant differences in psychopathy among groups. High-risk offenders demonstrated higher rates of violence throughout treatment compared to moderate- and low-risk offenders; however, no differences in substance use outcomes were found.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nA limitation of the study is the extent to which the results can be generalized beyond substance using IPV offenders. Further investigation of treatment outcomes including alternate measures is needed in order to better translate theoretical typologies to clinical settings.\n\n\nPractical implications\nResults provide support for differentiating treatment for substance-using male offenders of IPV based on typology as those with low/moderate risk level appear to be distinctly different and have different treatment outcomes compared to high risk level offenders.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough the relationship between risk level and treatment outcomes has been researched with Drug Court Offenders, treatment outcomes based on typology has not been evaluated among substance using male offenders of IPV.\n","PeriodicalId":51922,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ADD-01-2018-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether aggression and substance use assessed during treatment differ based on risk level for substance-using male offenders of intimate partner violence (IPV). Design/methodology/approach Secondary analyses were conducted using data from Easton et al.’s (2017) study on substance-dependent IPV offenders. A cluster analysis was utilized in order to classify participants into typology groups. Analyses of covariance were conducted in order to determine group differences in aggression and substance use during treatment. Findings The paper provides results-related response to treatment based on offender typology. Results appear to reflect two typology groups with significant differences in psychopathy among groups. High-risk offenders demonstrated higher rates of violence throughout treatment compared to moderate- and low-risk offenders; however, no differences in substance use outcomes were found. Research limitations/implications A limitation of the study is the extent to which the results can be generalized beyond substance using IPV offenders. Further investigation of treatment outcomes including alternate measures is needed in order to better translate theoretical typologies to clinical settings. Practical implications Results provide support for differentiating treatment for substance-using male offenders of IPV based on typology as those with low/moderate risk level appear to be distinctly different and have different treatment outcomes compared to high risk level offenders. Originality/value Although the relationship between risk level and treatment outcomes has been researched with Drug Court Offenders, treatment outcomes based on typology has not been evaluated among substance using male offenders of IPV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IPV物质使用罪犯的类型:暴力和物质使用结果
目的探讨亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)男性施暴者在治疗期间的攻击和物质使用评估是否存在不同风险水平的差异。设计/方法/方法使用Easton等人(2017年)对物质依赖的IPV违法者的研究数据进行了二次分析。利用聚类分析将参与者划分为类型学组。进行协方差分析,以确定治疗期间攻击和物质使用的组间差异。研究结果基于罪犯类型提供了与结果相关的治疗响应。结果似乎反映了两个类型学组在组间的精神病有显著差异。与中度和低风险罪犯相比,高风险罪犯在整个治疗过程中表现出更高的暴力率;然而,药物使用结果没有发现差异。研究的局限性/意义研究的一个局限性是研究结果可以推广到使用IPV违法者以外的程度。需要进一步研究治疗结果,包括替代措施,以便更好地将理论类型学转化为临床环境。实践意义:低/中危险水平的男性吸毒犯与高危水平的男性吸毒犯相比,存在明显差异,治疗结果也存在差异,研究结果为基于类型区分治疗提供了支持。虽然风险水平与治疗结果之间的关系已经在毒品法庭罪犯中进行了研究,但基于类型学的治疗结果尚未在使用物质的男性IPV罪犯中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Dual Diagnosis
Advances in Dual Diagnosis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The needs of carers who support people living with schizophrenia and a substance use disorder: a multiperspective evaluation Combating stigma: development and implementation of an education resource on older adults behavioral health challenges Positive addiction recovery therapy: a replication and follow-up study Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation implementation within residential substance use disorder treatment centers for patients with comorbid depression Addiction recovery stories: Bradley Maguire in conversation with Lisa Ogilvie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1