Evaluation of Results and Patients’ Satisfaction of Alar Base Resection Surgery after Rhinoplasty Operations in 15 Khordad Hospital

S. Sadeghi, G. Ghoseiri, H. Afshar
{"title":"Evaluation of Results and Patients’ Satisfaction of Alar Base Resection Surgery after Rhinoplasty Operations in 15 Khordad Hospital","authors":"S. Sadeghi, G. Ghoseiri, H. Afshar","doi":"10.22037/NBM.V7I1.23111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Alar base surgery is one of the controversial issues in rhinoplasty. In this surgery the nasal base width and alar flaring is got smaller with some kind of procedures. One of these procedures is wedge resection of alar base. This procedure may accompany with either some dissatisfaction of scars and adverse effects or complications. In this study, we evaluate the patient satisfaction of scar and possible complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 rhinoplasty patients at 15 khordad hospital were candidates for alar base wedge resection due to broad nasal base and / or alar flaring who were chosen for this study. We recorded and examined these patients before and minimum 6 months after surgery, then evaluated these information and data, which finally, compared all the preoperation and postoperation findings. Results: Mean age of patients was 30.11 years old. The full satisfaction of scar was 85.5% (103), but 6.7% (8) of patients had not satisfaction of scar due to visible scar in their alar facial groove. The rate of nostril symmetry satisfaction was 79.2% (95) and 8.3% (10) was dissatisfied due to nostril asymmetry. There was no external valve incompetency nor alar and sill notching in our study. There was not any narrowing of nostrils as well. The mean interalar distance preoperatively was 35.88 mm, which reduced to 32.61mm of mean diameter after surgery, (P-value = 0.000). Alar flaring correction was 88% (106) which was an acceptable consequence. Conclusion: The results of present study showed that in spite of surgeons fear for scar and some common complications after alar base resection, the satisfaction rate of our patients in this study were high, and complications frequencies were low. Therefore, we advise that it is better and wiser to do this operation in indicated patients surely within primary rhinoplasty and do not postpone it to another surgery.","PeriodicalId":19372,"journal":{"name":"Novelty in Biomedicine","volume":"60 1","pages":"10-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novelty in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/NBM.V7I1.23111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alar base surgery is one of the controversial issues in rhinoplasty. In this surgery the nasal base width and alar flaring is got smaller with some kind of procedures. One of these procedures is wedge resection of alar base. This procedure may accompany with either some dissatisfaction of scars and adverse effects or complications. In this study, we evaluate the patient satisfaction of scar and possible complications. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 rhinoplasty patients at 15 khordad hospital were candidates for alar base wedge resection due to broad nasal base and / or alar flaring who were chosen for this study. We recorded and examined these patients before and minimum 6 months after surgery, then evaluated these information and data, which finally, compared all the preoperation and postoperation findings. Results: Mean age of patients was 30.11 years old. The full satisfaction of scar was 85.5% (103), but 6.7% (8) of patients had not satisfaction of scar due to visible scar in their alar facial groove. The rate of nostril symmetry satisfaction was 79.2% (95) and 8.3% (10) was dissatisfied due to nostril asymmetry. There was no external valve incompetency nor alar and sill notching in our study. There was not any narrowing of nostrils as well. The mean interalar distance preoperatively was 35.88 mm, which reduced to 32.61mm of mean diameter after surgery, (P-value = 0.000). Alar flaring correction was 88% (106) which was an acceptable consequence. Conclusion: The results of present study showed that in spite of surgeons fear for scar and some common complications after alar base resection, the satisfaction rate of our patients in this study were high, and complications frequencies were low. Therefore, we advise that it is better and wiser to do this operation in indicated patients surely within primary rhinoplasty and do not postpone it to another surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
霍达德医院15例鼻整形术后鼻翼基底切除疗效及患者满意度评价
背景:鼻翼底手术是鼻整形中有争议的问题之一。在这个手术中鼻底的宽度和鼻翼的扩张通过某种方法变小了。其中一种手术是鼻翼基部楔形切除。这种手术可能伴随一些疤痕的不满意和不良反应或并发症。在这项研究中,我们评估患者对疤痕的满意度和可能的并发症。材料和方法:本研究选取了15家khordad医院的120例鼻整形患者,这些患者因鼻基底宽和/或鼻翼突出而选择鼻翼基底楔形切除术。我们记录和检查这些患者术前和术后至少6个月,然后评估这些信息和数据,最后比较所有术前和术后的结果。结果:患者平均年龄30.11岁。瘢痕完全满意率为85.5%(103例),但有6.7%(8例)患者因鼻翼面沟可见瘢痕而对瘢痕不满意。鼻孔对称满意率为79.2%(95例),因鼻孔不对称不满意者为8.3%(10例)。本研究未见外瓣膜功能不全,也未见鼻翼和缺口。鼻孔也没有缩窄。术前平均指间距为35.88 mm,术后平均指间距降至32.61mm,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.000)。鼻翼扩张矫正率为88%(106),这是可接受的结果。结论:本研究结果表明,尽管外科医生担心鼻翼底切除术后会出现疤痕和一些常见的并发症,但本研究患者的满意率高,并发症发生率低。因此,我们建议在初次鼻成形术的适应症患者进行此手术是更好和更明智的,而不是推迟到另一次手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unusual Airway Obstruction during General Anesthesia following Endotracheal Tube Cuff Herniation; A Case Report The Issue of Embryo Implantation in Women during the Coronavirus Outbreak: An Overview: Positive Result for SARS-CoV-2 RNA Test after a Long Time for the Patient with COVID-19 even after Discharge from the Hospital Investigating the Facilitating Factors of Drug Use Based on Personality and Ethnic Characteristics of Guilan Province Efficient of Toll‐Like Receptor 4 Knockout in Mouse Zygotes by CRISPER/Cas9:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1