Monitoring the organizational wellness of a physician residency program: A quality improvement process

Mary R. Talen, D. Edberg, Ari Pence, Laura Khan
{"title":"Monitoring the organizational wellness of a physician residency program: A quality improvement process","authors":"Mary R. Talen, D. Edberg, Ari Pence, Laura Khan","doi":"10.1177/0091217419862480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Burnout and depression throughout physicians’ career cycles have been increasing. There has been a call for medical education leaders to devote resources to bolster the next generation of providers and shift the culture of medicine to organizational initiatives that impact physician well-being. Objective: The goal of this project has been to monitor and improve the organizational wellness of a residency program based on four core organizational areas: (1) culture of meaning and mission, (2) work capacity, (3) control and flexibility in decision-making, and (4) creativity in work–life balance. Method: A quality improvement strategy was implemented to monitor organizational wellness. The wellness was assessed five times over the course of 18 months. The survey was designed to evaluate the four core components. At each time interval, improvement strategies were implemented to address the wellness drains and strengthen drivers. Results: The four time series evaluations (residents: n = 19) indicated that culture of meaning, teamwork, and personal creativity are consistent wellness drivers. Work capacity and lack of control over decision-making were consistent drains. From first until last measurement, there was a slight improvement in control-decision-making; however, the burden of electronic medical record (EMR) charting and strains of coverage continue to drain our residency. Discussion and Conclusions: This model incorporates four categories for assessing organizational wellness within a residency program. The conceptual model is used as a framework to define, measure, analyze, and improve on organizational wellness. This process provides programs with a feedback approach to continually monitor and reassess the wellness of the organizational systems.","PeriodicalId":22510,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","volume":"76 1","pages":"316 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091217419862480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Burnout and depression throughout physicians’ career cycles have been increasing. There has been a call for medical education leaders to devote resources to bolster the next generation of providers and shift the culture of medicine to organizational initiatives that impact physician well-being. Objective: The goal of this project has been to monitor and improve the organizational wellness of a residency program based on four core organizational areas: (1) culture of meaning and mission, (2) work capacity, (3) control and flexibility in decision-making, and (4) creativity in work–life balance. Method: A quality improvement strategy was implemented to monitor organizational wellness. The wellness was assessed five times over the course of 18 months. The survey was designed to evaluate the four core components. At each time interval, improvement strategies were implemented to address the wellness drains and strengthen drivers. Results: The four time series evaluations (residents: n = 19) indicated that culture of meaning, teamwork, and personal creativity are consistent wellness drivers. Work capacity and lack of control over decision-making were consistent drains. From first until last measurement, there was a slight improvement in control-decision-making; however, the burden of electronic medical record (EMR) charting and strains of coverage continue to drain our residency. Discussion and Conclusions: This model incorporates four categories for assessing organizational wellness within a residency program. The conceptual model is used as a framework to define, measure, analyze, and improve on organizational wellness. This process provides programs with a feedback approach to continually monitor and reassess the wellness of the organizational systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监测医师住院医师计划的组织健康:一个质量改进过程
背景在医生的职业生涯中,职业倦怠和抑郁症一直在增加。有人呼吁医学教育领导者投入资源来支持下一代提供者,并将医学文化转变为影响医生福祉的组织倡议。目的:本项目的目标是监测和改善住院医师计划的组织健康,基于四个核心组织领域:(1)意义和使命文化,(2)工作能力,(3)决策的控制和灵活性,以及(4)工作与生活平衡的创造力。方法:采用质量改进策略对组织健康状况进行监测。在18个月的时间里,他们的健康状况被评估了5次。该调查旨在评估四个核心组成部分。在每个时间间隔,实施改进策略,以解决健康流失和加强驱动程序。结果:4个时间序列评估(住院医师:n = 19)表明意义文化、团队合作和个人创造力是一致的健康驱动因素。工作能力和缺乏对决策的控制是持续的消耗。从第一次到最后一次测量,在控制决策方面有轻微的改善;然而,电子病历(EMR)图表的负担和覆盖范围的紧张继续消耗我们的住院医师。讨论与结论:该模型包含四个类别,用于评估住院医师计划中的组织健康。概念模型被用作定义、测量、分析和改进组织健康的框架。这一过程为项目提供了一种持续监测和重新评估组织系统健康的反馈方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of AI in the creation of discharge summaries in psychiatric clinics Clinical correlates of medication adherence in individuals with bipolar disorder and comorbid hypertension All medical workers together: For better mental health and primary health care- Posters Duration of untreated psychosis and its associated sociodemographic and clinical factors in first-episode psychosis: A study from Eastern Nepal Depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and suicide in first-degree relatives of patients hospitalised in intensive care units in Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1