Degradation of different photovoltaic technologies under field conditions

G. Makrides, B. Zinsser, G. Georghiou, M. Schubert, J. Werner
{"title":"Degradation of different photovoltaic technologies under field conditions","authors":"G. Makrides, B. Zinsser, G. Georghiou, M. Schubert, J. Werner","doi":"10.1109/PVSC.2010.5614439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past years a number of testing facilities have been monitoring the performance and degradation of PV systems according to the established standards of indoor and outdoor testing. The objective of this paper is to present the initial first year and longer-term rate of degradation of different PV technologies installed at the testing facility of the University of Cyprus, based on outdoor field measurements and methodologies. The first year degradation of the technologies was obtained using a data filtering technique of DC generated power at Maximum Power Point (MPP) at irradiation points of higher than 800 W/m2 and normalising the measured power to Standard Test Conditions (STC). Over the first year, mono-crystalline silicon technologies showed degradations in the range 2.12 % – 4.73 % while for multi-crystalline technologies the range was 1.47 % – 2.40 %. The amorphous silicon system demonstrated the highest first year decrease in power with an average degradation of 13.82 %. For validation purposes the first year degradation was also obtained using a second technique by evaluating outdoor measured data-sets under Air Mass (AM) 1.5 (morning and afternoon) conditions and during noon (high irradiance and temperature). In this case the evaluated results showed deviations of up to 6 % and 3 % for mono-crystalline and multi-crystalline technologies respectively whereas for thin-film this was 5 %. Finally, the longer-term degradation rates were evaluated by using the least-square fit method on average monthly data-set blocks of (i) Performance Ratio (PR), (ii) PR evaluated by filtering outage data-sets and restricting to high irradiance conditions and (iii) the Photovoltaic for Utility Systems Applications (PVUSA) rating methods, for the period June 2007 – June 2009.","PeriodicalId":6424,"journal":{"name":"2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference","volume":"4 1","pages":"002332-002337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2010.5614439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Over the past years a number of testing facilities have been monitoring the performance and degradation of PV systems according to the established standards of indoor and outdoor testing. The objective of this paper is to present the initial first year and longer-term rate of degradation of different PV technologies installed at the testing facility of the University of Cyprus, based on outdoor field measurements and methodologies. The first year degradation of the technologies was obtained using a data filtering technique of DC generated power at Maximum Power Point (MPP) at irradiation points of higher than 800 W/m2 and normalising the measured power to Standard Test Conditions (STC). Over the first year, mono-crystalline silicon technologies showed degradations in the range 2.12 % – 4.73 % while for multi-crystalline technologies the range was 1.47 % – 2.40 %. The amorphous silicon system demonstrated the highest first year decrease in power with an average degradation of 13.82 %. For validation purposes the first year degradation was also obtained using a second technique by evaluating outdoor measured data-sets under Air Mass (AM) 1.5 (morning and afternoon) conditions and during noon (high irradiance and temperature). In this case the evaluated results showed deviations of up to 6 % and 3 % for mono-crystalline and multi-crystalline technologies respectively whereas for thin-film this was 5 %. Finally, the longer-term degradation rates were evaluated by using the least-square fit method on average monthly data-set blocks of (i) Performance Ratio (PR), (ii) PR evaluated by filtering outage data-sets and restricting to high irradiance conditions and (iii) the Photovoltaic for Utility Systems Applications (PVUSA) rating methods, for the period June 2007 – June 2009.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同光伏技术在野外条件下的退化
在过去的几年里,许多测试机构一直在根据室内和室外测试的既定标准监测光伏系统的性能和退化。本文的目的是根据室外实地测量和方法,介绍在塞浦路斯大学测试设施安装的不同光伏技术的最初第一年和长期退化率。第一年的技术退化是通过在辐照点高于800 W/m2的最大功率点(MPP)直流产生功率的数据滤波技术获得的,并将测量功率归一到标准测试条件(STC)。在第一年里,单晶硅技术的降解率在2.12% - 4.73%之间,而多晶硅技术的降解率在1.47% - 2.40%之间。非晶硅系统显示出最大的第一年功率下降,平均下降13.82%。为了验证目的,还使用第二种技术,通过评估空气质量(AM) 1.5(上午和下午)条件下以及中午(高辐照度和高温度)的室外测量数据集,获得了第一年的退化。在这种情况下,评估结果显示单晶和多晶技术的偏差分别高达6%和3%,而薄膜技术的偏差为5%。最后,对2007年6月至2009年6月期间的(i)性能比(PR)、(ii)通过过滤停电数据集并限制在高辐照条件下评估的PR和(iii)公用事业系统应用光伏(PVUSA)评级方法,使用最小二乘拟合方法对平均每月数据集块进行长期退化率评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reaching grid parity using BP Solar crystalline silicon technology Interaction between post wire saw cleaning and the subsequent cell fabrication saw damage etch and texturing process Durability evaluation of InGaP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells in HIHT environments for Mercury exploration mission Impact of materials on back-contact module reliability Paste development for screen printed mc-Si MWT solar cells exceeding 17% efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1