Impact of Focused Intraoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography by Anaesthesiologists on Management in Hemodynamically Unstable High-Risk Noncardiac Surgery Patients

T. Kratz, T. Steinfeldt, M. Exner, M. C. DellʼOrto, N. Timmesfeld, C. Kratz, M. Skrodzki, H. Wulf, M. Zoremba
{"title":"Impact of Focused Intraoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography by Anaesthesiologists on Management in Hemodynamically Unstable High-Risk Noncardiac Surgery Patients","authors":"T. Kratz, T. Steinfeldt, M. Exner, M. C. DellʼOrto, N. Timmesfeld, C. Kratz, M. Skrodzki, H. Wulf, M. Zoremba","doi":"10.1097/01.sa.0000525647.48445.c1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and intervention using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in highrisk surgery patients can decrease the rates of adverse events, morbidity, and mortality; however, evidence regarding its benefits is required. This prospective interventional study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of intraoperative TTE to alter patient management in high-risk and extensively monitored surgical patients susceptible to hemodynamic instability. The study included 52 hemodynamically unstable high-risk abdominal, vascular, or thoracic surgery patients. Patients were anesthetized, and focused TTE was performed when intraoperative hemodynamic instability occurred (hypotension or low cardiac output for a period of ≥3 minutes). Cardiac output monitoring system using pulse contour analysis was established before induction of anesthesia. The definitive therapy leading to an alteration of management was guided by the results of the focused TTE. Differences between intended and actual therapies and changes in management were documented as the primary end points. The analysis of TTE quality and description of pathophysiologic cardiovascular findings were the secondary end points. Sample size estimation and statistical analyses were performed with the statistical software R (www.r-project.org). Changes of management were noted in 33 patients (66%; 95% confidence interval, 52.11%–77.61%) and 38 hemodynamic situations (46.34%; 95% confidence interval, 35.95%–57.06%) of the 50 hemodynamically unstable patients examined by additional focused TTE. Transthoracic echocardiography identified pathologic findings in 47 patients: hypovolemia (66%), left ventricular dysfunction (8%), right ventricular overload (22%), and right-sided heart failure (4%). Lack of randomization and the absence of a control group were the major limitations of this study.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000525647.48445.c1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and intervention using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in highrisk surgery patients can decrease the rates of adverse events, morbidity, and mortality; however, evidence regarding its benefits is required. This prospective interventional study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of intraoperative TTE to alter patient management in high-risk and extensively monitored surgical patients susceptible to hemodynamic instability. The study included 52 hemodynamically unstable high-risk abdominal, vascular, or thoracic surgery patients. Patients were anesthetized, and focused TTE was performed when intraoperative hemodynamic instability occurred (hypotension or low cardiac output for a period of ≥3 minutes). Cardiac output monitoring system using pulse contour analysis was established before induction of anesthesia. The definitive therapy leading to an alteration of management was guided by the results of the focused TTE. Differences between intended and actual therapies and changes in management were documented as the primary end points. The analysis of TTE quality and description of pathophysiologic cardiovascular findings were the secondary end points. Sample size estimation and statistical analyses were performed with the statistical software R (www.r-project.org). Changes of management were noted in 33 patients (66%; 95% confidence interval, 52.11%–77.61%) and 38 hemodynamic situations (46.34%; 95% confidence interval, 35.95%–57.06%) of the 50 hemodynamically unstable patients examined by additional focused TTE. Transthoracic echocardiography identified pathologic findings in 47 patients: hypovolemia (66%), left ventricular dysfunction (8%), right ventricular overload (22%), and right-sided heart failure (4%). Lack of randomization and the absence of a control group were the major limitations of this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉医师术中经胸超声心动图对血流动力学不稳定高危非心脏手术患者处理的影响
应用经胸超声心动图(TTE)对高危手术患者进行围手术期血流动力学监测和干预可以降低不良事件发生率、发病率和死亡率;然而,需要证据来证明它的好处。这项前瞻性介入研究旨在评估术中TTE对易发生血流动力学不稳定的高风险和广泛监测的外科患者的治疗效果。该研究包括52例血液动力学不稳定的高危腹部、血管或胸外科患者。患者麻醉后,术中血流动力学不稳定(低血压或低心排血量≥3分钟)时进行集中TTE。建立了麻醉诱导前脉搏轮廓分析的心输出量监测系统。最终的治疗导致管理的改变是由重点TTE的结果指导的。预期治疗和实际治疗之间的差异以及管理的变化被记录为主要终点。TTE质量分析和心血管病理生理表现描述是次要终点。使用统计软件R (www.r-project.org)进行样本量估计和统计分析。33例患者(66%;95%可信区间为52.11% ~ 77.61%)和38种血流动力学情况(46.34%;(95%可信区间,35.95% ~ 57.06%)。经胸超声心动图确定了47例患者的病理表现:低血容量(66%)、左心室功能障碍(8%)、右心室负荷过重(22%)和右侧心力衰竭(4%)。缺乏随机化和缺乏对照组是本研究的主要局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Context is king - obstetric anaesthesia management strategies in limited resource settings. Preoperative Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Do We Have Enough “VISION” to Stop It? Implementing a Statistical Model for Protamine Titration: Effects on Coagulation in Cardiac Surgical Patients Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Surgery: Another “VASST” Difference? Prospective Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of the Pectoral Nerves (Pecs) Block Type II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1