Optimization and Analysis of Plastic Film Consumption for Wrapping Round Baled Silage Using Combined 3D Method Considering Effects of Bale Dimensions

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Transactions of the ASABE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.13031/TRANS.14137
A. Stankiewicz
{"title":"Optimization and Analysis of Plastic Film Consumption for Wrapping Round Baled Silage Using Combined 3D Method Considering Effects of Bale Dimensions","authors":"A. Stankiewicz","doi":"10.13031/TRANS.14137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsSolved the problem of optimal design, in the sense of minimal film usage, of round bale diameter and height.Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions derived in the form of easy-to-solve cubic equations.Bales of a maximum volume achievable with an actual wrapper and of optimal dimensions ensure minimal film usage.Up to 10% savings in film usage if bale dimensions are optimally designed and wrapping parameters properly selected.Abstract. The combined 3D method is used for wrapping cylindrical bales of agricultural materials based on biaxial rotation of the film applicators. The demand for minimization of plastic film consumption keeps increasing, with the goal to save the environment, reduce plastic costs, and minimize wrapping time. Consequently, methods have been reported to solve the problem of optimal wrapping parameters for the conventional wrapping method. In this article, a model-based problem of such a design based on round bale dimensions (diameter and height) that minimizes film consumption for the combined 3D method is mathematically formulated and analyzed. The film consumption per unit of bale volume is used as a measure of film usage. Generally, it is difficult to find the optimal bale dimensions that minimize the original film usage index, due to the discontinuity of the index. Thus, near-optimal parameters, being as important as optimal parameters for engineering applications, are looked for. The problem of selecting near-optimal bale dimensions was constructed by minimizing the continuous lower bound of the original film usage index. The necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for near-optimal bale dimensions were established in the form of standard cubic equations, which can easily be solved using both analytical and numerical methods. Based on the optimality conditions, analytical and numerical analyses were performed of the influence of film width, pre-assumed bale volume, and numbers of bottom and upper film layers on the near-optimal bale dimensions and film usage. The results indicated that the near-optimal bale diameter and height, hereinafter called optimal, monotonically increase, while the optimal film consumption monotonically decreases, with increasing pre-assumed bale volume. Therefore, it is recommended to use bales of a maximum volume achievable with an actual wrapper and of optimal dimensions, i.e., diameter and height. The film width also influences the optimal bale dimensions and film usage: the wider the film, the smaller the minimal film usage. To confirm the effect of near-optimal bale design on film usage, the errors of the near-optimality were examined for four to sixteen film layers. The results of the numerical experiments demonstrated that for four to sixteen layers of film, there are compositions of the bottom and upper film layers for which the relative near-optimality errors do not exceed 0.01% whenever the optimal bale dimensions are used. Simultaneously, inappropriate selection of wrapping parameters may result in increased film usage, measured by mean relative errors of 1% to 9.5%, which means up to 10% film cost savings when the bale dimensions are optimally designed according to the proposed approach, and the wrapping parameters are appropriately selected. Keywords: 3D bale wrapping, Mathematical model, Minimal film consumption, Round bales, Stretch film usage.","PeriodicalId":23120,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the ASABE","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/TRANS.14137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

HighlightsSolved the problem of optimal design, in the sense of minimal film usage, of round bale diameter and height.Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions derived in the form of easy-to-solve cubic equations.Bales of a maximum volume achievable with an actual wrapper and of optimal dimensions ensure minimal film usage.Up to 10% savings in film usage if bale dimensions are optimally designed and wrapping parameters properly selected.Abstract. The combined 3D method is used for wrapping cylindrical bales of agricultural materials based on biaxial rotation of the film applicators. The demand for minimization of plastic film consumption keeps increasing, with the goal to save the environment, reduce plastic costs, and minimize wrapping time. Consequently, methods have been reported to solve the problem of optimal wrapping parameters for the conventional wrapping method. In this article, a model-based problem of such a design based on round bale dimensions (diameter and height) that minimizes film consumption for the combined 3D method is mathematically formulated and analyzed. The film consumption per unit of bale volume is used as a measure of film usage. Generally, it is difficult to find the optimal bale dimensions that minimize the original film usage index, due to the discontinuity of the index. Thus, near-optimal parameters, being as important as optimal parameters for engineering applications, are looked for. The problem of selecting near-optimal bale dimensions was constructed by minimizing the continuous lower bound of the original film usage index. The necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for near-optimal bale dimensions were established in the form of standard cubic equations, which can easily be solved using both analytical and numerical methods. Based on the optimality conditions, analytical and numerical analyses were performed of the influence of film width, pre-assumed bale volume, and numbers of bottom and upper film layers on the near-optimal bale dimensions and film usage. The results indicated that the near-optimal bale diameter and height, hereinafter called optimal, monotonically increase, while the optimal film consumption monotonically decreases, with increasing pre-assumed bale volume. Therefore, it is recommended to use bales of a maximum volume achievable with an actual wrapper and of optimal dimensions, i.e., diameter and height. The film width also influences the optimal bale dimensions and film usage: the wider the film, the smaller the minimal film usage. To confirm the effect of near-optimal bale design on film usage, the errors of the near-optimality were examined for four to sixteen film layers. The results of the numerical experiments demonstrated that for four to sixteen layers of film, there are compositions of the bottom and upper film layers for which the relative near-optimality errors do not exceed 0.01% whenever the optimal bale dimensions are used. Simultaneously, inappropriate selection of wrapping parameters may result in increased film usage, measured by mean relative errors of 1% to 9.5%, which means up to 10% film cost savings when the bale dimensions are optimally designed according to the proposed approach, and the wrapping parameters are appropriately selected. Keywords: 3D bale wrapping, Mathematical model, Minimal film consumption, Round bales, Stretch film usage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑包捆尺寸影响的组合三维方法优化青贮圆捆膜耗量分析
解决了圆捆直径和高度的优化设计问题,在膜用量最小的意义上。以易解三次方程形式导出的充分必要最优性条件。最大容量的包可实现与实际包装和最佳尺寸,确保最小的薄膜使用。高达10%的节省薄膜使用,如果包尺寸的优化设计和包装参数正确选择。该组合三维方法用于基于涂膜器的双轴旋转包裹圆柱形农业材料包。人们对塑料薄膜消耗最小化的要求不断提高,目的是为了保护环境,降低塑料成本,最大限度地减少包装时间。因此,已有报道提出了解决传统缠绕方法的最优缠绕参数问题的方法。在本文中,基于圆捆尺寸(直径和高度)的这种设计的基于模型的问题是最小的薄膜消耗的组合三维方法的数学公式和分析。每单位包体积的薄膜消耗量被用作薄膜使用量的度量。通常,由于原始薄膜使用指数的不连续性,很难找到使原始薄膜使用指数最小的最佳捆包尺寸。因此,在工程应用中,寻找与最优参数同样重要的近最优参数。通过最小化原始膜利用率指数的连续下界,构造了近最优包尺寸选择问题。以标准三次方程的形式,建立了近最优包捆尺寸的充要条件,该条件易于用解析和数值方法求解。基于最优条件,分析和数值分析了薄膜宽度、预估的包体积、底层和上层薄膜层数对接近最优的包尺寸和薄膜使用量的影响。结果表明:随着预设包量的增加,近最优包径和包高(以下简称最优)单调增加,最优耗膜量单调减少;因此,建议使用实际包装器可实现的最大体积和最佳尺寸(即直径和高度)的包。薄膜宽度也影响最佳捆尺寸和薄膜用量:薄膜越宽,最小薄膜用量越小。为了确认近最优包捆设计对薄膜使用的影响,研究了4到16层薄膜的近最优误差。数值实验结果表明,对于4 ~ 16层薄膜,当使用最优包尺寸时,存在底层和上层薄膜组成的相对近最优误差不超过0.01%。同时,不适当的包装参数选择可能导致薄膜使用量增加,平均相对误差为1%至9.5%,这意味着当根据所提出的方法优化设计包捆尺寸并选择适当的包装参数时,可节省高达10%的薄膜成本。关键词:三维包捆,数学模型,最小薄膜消耗,圆捆,拉伸膜使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of the ASABE
Transactions of the ASABE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal publishes research that advances the engineering of agricultural, food, and biological systems. Submissions must include original data, analysis or design, or synthesis of existing information; research information for the improvement of education, design, construction, or manufacturing practice; or significant and convincing evidence that confirms and strengthens the findings of others or that revises ideas or challenges accepted theory.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Nutrient Management for Reducing Phosphorus Losses from Agricultural Areas. Effectiveness of Nutrient Management on Water Quality Improvement: A Synthesis on Nitrate-Nitrogen Loss from Subsurface Drainage. Comparison of Droplet Size, Coverage, and Drift Potential from UAV Application Methods and Ground Application Methods on Row Crops. Experimental Study on Critical Shear Stress of Cohesive Soils and Soil Mixtures Dynamics of Texture Change and in Vitro Starch Digestibility with High-Pressure, Freeze-Thaw Cycle, and Germination-Parboiling Treatments of Brown Rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1