Susanna B Poghosyan, Susanna A Muradyan, Siranush Ogannesovna Ter-Zaqaryan, A. Keshishyan, A. N. Dzhandzhapanyan, A. Mikaelyan, Natalya S Tadevosyan
{"title":"The estimation of the toxic effects of «Complex Plus» agrochemical and perspective use in agriculture","authors":"Susanna B Poghosyan, Susanna A Muradyan, Siranush Ogannesovna Ter-Zaqaryan, A. Keshishyan, A. N. Dzhandzhapanyan, A. Mikaelyan, Natalya S Tadevosyan","doi":"10.47470/0869-7922-2023-31-2-127-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"use of agrochemicals strengthen health and environmental issues. To insure the safe use of new preparations, acute and sub-acute studies must to be done. \nIn this study, the estimation of the toxic effects of “Complex Plus” formulation synthesized on the basis of imidacloprid and proposed as growth stimulator, insecticide and microelements complex simultaneously has been achieved. \nMaterial and methods. The oral and dermal LD50 have been established, sensitivity by sex, skin-irritating and allergic effects, effect on the mucous membranes (rats, rabbits) were studied. The results were processed by the method of variation statistics; standard errors, etc. were calculated by the method of probabilistic analysis of Litchfield–Wilcoxon in the modification of Prozorovsky. The values difference was estimated by two-tailed Student’s test (t-test) with significance level at p<0.05. \nResults. The acute intoxication was manifested in some disorders of the central nervous system. Oral LD50 was 805±27 mg/kg bodyweight (II Class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419); dermal LD50>2000 mg/kg bodyweight (III class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419). Sex sensitivity and skin-irritating effects were not revealed. The formulation had a moderate irritant effect on the mucous membranes of eyes (rabbits) and no sensitizing effect. Immunological tests in vitro were negative. \nLimitation. Acute toxicity and sensitizing effect of formulation was studied. \nConclusion. Strict complying with the established agrotechnical requirements, hygienic regulations when using the proposed agrochemical will undoubtedly reduce the adverse effects of this formulation on the population and the environment, and will also contribute to development of agriculture in Armenia in the cost-effective way.","PeriodicalId":23128,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Review","volume":"134 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2023-31-2-127-134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
use of agrochemicals strengthen health and environmental issues. To insure the safe use of new preparations, acute and sub-acute studies must to be done.
In this study, the estimation of the toxic effects of “Complex Plus” formulation synthesized on the basis of imidacloprid and proposed as growth stimulator, insecticide and microelements complex simultaneously has been achieved.
Material and methods. The oral and dermal LD50 have been established, sensitivity by sex, skin-irritating and allergic effects, effect on the mucous membranes (rats, rabbits) were studied. The results were processed by the method of variation statistics; standard errors, etc. were calculated by the method of probabilistic analysis of Litchfield–Wilcoxon in the modification of Prozorovsky. The values difference was estimated by two-tailed Student’s test (t-test) with significance level at p<0.05.
Results. The acute intoxication was manifested in some disorders of the central nervous system. Oral LD50 was 805±27 mg/kg bodyweight (II Class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419); dermal LD50>2000 mg/kg bodyweight (III class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419). Sex sensitivity and skin-irritating effects were not revealed. The formulation had a moderate irritant effect on the mucous membranes of eyes (rabbits) and no sensitizing effect. Immunological tests in vitro were negative.
Limitation. Acute toxicity and sensitizing effect of formulation was studied.
Conclusion. Strict complying with the established agrotechnical requirements, hygienic regulations when using the proposed agrochemical will undoubtedly reduce the adverse effects of this formulation on the population and the environment, and will also contribute to development of agriculture in Armenia in the cost-effective way.