The estimation of the toxic effects of «Complex Plus» agrochemical and perspective use in agriculture

Susanna B Poghosyan, Susanna A Muradyan, Siranush Ogannesovna Ter-Zaqaryan, A. Keshishyan, A. N. Dzhandzhapanyan, A. Mikaelyan, Natalya S Tadevosyan
{"title":"The estimation of the toxic effects of «Complex Plus» agrochemical and perspective use in agriculture","authors":"Susanna B Poghosyan, Susanna A Muradyan, Siranush Ogannesovna Ter-Zaqaryan, A. Keshishyan, A. N. Dzhandzhapanyan, A. Mikaelyan, Natalya S Tadevosyan","doi":"10.47470/0869-7922-2023-31-2-127-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"use of agrochemicals strengthen health and environmental issues. To insure the safe use of new preparations, acute and sub-acute studies must to be done. \nIn this study, the estimation of the toxic effects of “Complex Plus” formulation synthesized on the basis of imidacloprid and proposed as growth stimulator, insecticide and microelements complex simultaneously has been achieved. \nMaterial and methods. The oral and dermal LD50 have been established, sensitivity by sex, skin-irritating and allergic effects, effect on the mucous membranes (rats, rabbits) were studied. The results were processed by the method of variation statistics; standard errors, etc. were calculated by the method of probabilistic analysis of Litchfield–Wilcoxon in the modification of Prozorovsky. The values difference was estimated by two-tailed Student’s test (t-test) with significance level at p<0.05. \nResults. The acute intoxication was manifested in some disorders of the central nervous system. Oral LD50 was 805±27 mg/kg bodyweight (II Class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419); dermal LD50>2000 mg/kg bodyweight (III class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419). Sex sensitivity and skin-irritating effects were not revealed. The formulation had a moderate irritant effect on the mucous membranes of eyes (rabbits) and no sensitizing effect. Immunological tests in vitro were negative. \nLimitation. Acute toxicity and sensitizing effect of formulation was studied. \nConclusion. Strict complying with the established agrotechnical requirements, hygienic regulations when using the proposed agrochemical will undoubtedly reduce the adverse effects of this formulation on the population and the environment, and will also contribute to development of agriculture in Armenia in the cost-effective way.","PeriodicalId":23128,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Review","volume":"134 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0869-7922-2023-31-2-127-134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

use of agrochemicals strengthen health and environmental issues. To insure the safe use of new preparations, acute and sub-acute studies must to be done. In this study, the estimation of the toxic effects of “Complex Plus” formulation synthesized on the basis of imidacloprid and proposed as growth stimulator, insecticide and microelements complex simultaneously has been achieved. Material and methods. The oral and dermal LD50 have been established, sensitivity by sex, skin-irritating and allergic effects, effect on the mucous membranes (rats, rabbits) were studied. The results were processed by the method of variation statistics; standard errors, etc. were calculated by the method of probabilistic analysis of Litchfield–Wilcoxon in the modification of Prozorovsky. The values difference was estimated by two-tailed Student’s test (t-test) with significance level at p<0.05. Results. The acute intoxication was manifested in some disorders of the central nervous system. Oral LD50 was 805±27 mg/kg bodyweight (II Class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419); dermal LD50>2000 mg/kg bodyweight (III class, WHO; IV class GOST 32419). Sex sensitivity and skin-irritating effects were not revealed. The formulation had a moderate irritant effect on the mucous membranes of eyes (rabbits) and no sensitizing effect. Immunological tests in vitro were negative. Limitation. Acute toxicity and sensitizing effect of formulation was studied. Conclusion. Strict complying with the established agrotechnical requirements, hygienic regulations when using the proposed agrochemical will undoubtedly reduce the adverse effects of this formulation on the population and the environment, and will also contribute to development of agriculture in Armenia in the cost-effective way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“复合+”农用化学品毒性效应的评估及其在农业中的应用前景
农用化学品的使用加剧了健康和环境问题。为了确保新制剂的安全使用,必须进行急性和亚急性研究。本研究对以吡虫啉为基础合成的同时作为生长刺激剂、杀虫剂和微量元素络合物的“Complex Plus”制剂的毒性效应进行了评价。材料和方法。建立了口服和皮肤的LD50,研究了性别敏感性,皮肤刺激和过敏效应,对粘膜的影响(大鼠,家兔)。采用方差统计方法对结果进行处理;在对Prozorovsky的修正中,采用Litchfield-Wilcoxon的概率分析方法计算标准误差等。采用双尾学生检验(t检验)估计差异值,显著水平为p2000 mg/kg体重(III类,WHO;IV类GOST 32419)。性敏感和皮肤刺激作用未被发现。该制剂对兔眼粘膜有中度刺激作用,无致敏作用。体外免疫试验为阴性。限制。研究了制剂的急性毒性和致敏作用。结论。在使用拟议的农用化学品时严格遵守既定的农业技术要求和卫生条例,无疑将减少这种配方对人口和环境的不利影响,并将以具有成本效益的方式促进亚美尼亚农业的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxic pollution: current aspects of plastic waste management, optimal solutions without prohibitive measures usage Mass hydrogen sulfide poisoning and the role of forensic medical examination in proving Development and validation of a method for the quantitative determination of metoprolol succinate in the air of the working area by high-performance liquid chromatography using mass spectra Effect of subchronic use of unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine on contractile activity of isolated lymphatic vessels Assessment and classification of the danger of endocrine disruptors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1