Establishing a More Effective SAFMR System: The Cost and Benefits of HUD's 2016 Small Area Fair Market Rent Rule

John Treat
{"title":"Establishing a More Effective SAFMR System: The Cost and Benefits of HUD's 2016 Small Area Fair Market Rent Rule","authors":"John Treat","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.51.3.establishing","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Note analyzes the new HUD rule finalized in November 2016, which dramatically changed the structure of the Housing Choice Voucher program in select metropolitan areas. In August 2017, HUD suspended automatic implementation of the rule until 2020 for twenty-three of the twenty-four selected metropolitan areas, but in December 2017, a preliminary injunction was granted requiring HUD to implement the rule as of January 1, 2018. The rule as written changes the method for calculating the vouchers from using a metropolitan area-wide average to calculating a separate level for each zip code. Such a change could greatly deconcentrate poverty and reduce economic and racial segregation; a result that the current status quo has failed to accomplish. The new rule, however, is not without its flaws. This Note offers a number of recommendations for changing the rule to address these flaws: (1) tweaking metro area selection criteria to include large, highly-segregated areas; (2) granting public housing agencies flexibility in implementing the rule; (3) including new protections for gentrifying neighborhoods and additional funding for landlord outreach and mobility counseling; and (4) revising methodology to increase accuracy. Despite the problems with the new rule, as long as HUD is truly committed to implementing it, its benefits are likely to outweigh its flaws.","PeriodicalId":83420,"journal":{"name":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.51.3.establishing","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This Note analyzes the new HUD rule finalized in November 2016, which dramatically changed the structure of the Housing Choice Voucher program in select metropolitan areas. In August 2017, HUD suspended automatic implementation of the rule until 2020 for twenty-three of the twenty-four selected metropolitan areas, but in December 2017, a preliminary injunction was granted requiring HUD to implement the rule as of January 1, 2018. The rule as written changes the method for calculating the vouchers from using a metropolitan area-wide average to calculating a separate level for each zip code. Such a change could greatly deconcentrate poverty and reduce economic and racial segregation; a result that the current status quo has failed to accomplish. The new rule, however, is not without its flaws. This Note offers a number of recommendations for changing the rule to address these flaws: (1) tweaking metro area selection criteria to include large, highly-segregated areas; (2) granting public housing agencies flexibility in implementing the rule; (3) including new protections for gentrifying neighborhoods and additional funding for landlord outreach and mobility counseling; and (4) revising methodology to increase accuracy. Despite the problems with the new rule, as long as HUD is truly committed to implementing it, its benefits are likely to outweigh its flaws.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立一个更有效的SAFMR系统:HUD 2016年小区域公平市场租金规则的成本和收益
本文分析了2016年11月敲定的HUD新规则,该规则极大地改变了部分大都市地区住房选择券计划的结构。2017年8月,HUD暂停在24个选定的大都市区中的23个自动实施该规则,直到2020年,但在2017年12月,一项初步禁令被授予,要求HUD从2018年1月1日起实施该规则。书面规则改变了计算代金券的方法,从使用大都市区范围内的平均值改为为每个邮政编码计算单独的水平。这种变化可以大大分散贫困,减少经济和种族隔离;这是目前现状未能实现的结果。然而,新规定并非没有缺陷。本文提供了一些修改规则的建议,以解决这些缺陷:(1)调整都市区选择标准,包括大型,高度隔离的地区;(二)允许公租房机构灵活执行;(3)包括对高档化社区的新保护,以及为房东外联和流动性咨询提供额外资金;(4)修正方法,提高准确性。尽管新规定存在问题,但只要HUD真正致力于实施它,它的好处可能大于缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System Out of Balance: A Critical Analysis of Philosophical Justifications for Copyright Law Through the Lenz of Users' Rights Giving the Fourth Amendment Meaning: Creating an Adversarial Warrant Proceeding to Protect From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Private Caregiver Presumption For Elder Caregivers The Short Unhappy Life of the Negotiation Class Former Whistleblowers: Why the False Claims Act's Anti-Retaliation Provision Should Protect Former Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1