Drinking during social isolation: investigating associations between stress, inhibitory control, boredom, drinking motives, and alcohol use

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Addiction Research & Theory Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1080/16066359.2022.2099543
James M. Clay, B. D. Fontana, C. Proserpio, E. Fernandez, E. Pagliarini, Fernando Lopes, J. A. López-Moreno, J. Canales, L. Loyant, Ravid Doron, L. Stafford, M. O. Parker
{"title":"Drinking during social isolation: investigating associations between stress, inhibitory control, boredom, drinking motives, and alcohol use","authors":"James M. Clay, B. D. Fontana, C. Proserpio, E. Fernandez, E. Pagliarini, Fernando Lopes, J. A. López-Moreno, J. Canales, L. Loyant, Ravid Doron, L. Stafford, M. O. Parker","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2022.2099543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: We aimed to assess whether stress, boredom, drinking motives, and/or inhibitory control were related to alcohol use during a period of social isolation. Method: Analyses were carried out on questionnaire data (N = 337) collected during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (7 April–3 May 2020). We first assessed changes in drinking behavior, stress and boredom. We then regressed drinking behavior on drinking motives, inhibitory control, stress, and boredom. We also investigated interactions between change in stress/boredom and inhibitory control. Results: A minority of respondents reported increased alcohol use (units = 23.52%, drinking days = 20.73%, heavy days = 7.06%), alcohol-related problems (9.67%), and stress (36.63%). Meanwhile, most respondents reported increased boredom (67.42%). Similarly, boredom significantly increased (B = 21.22, p < .001), on average, while alcohol-related problems decreased (B = −1.43 p < .001). Regarding drinking motives, decreased alcohol-related problems were associated with social drinking motives (B = −0.09, p = .005). Surprisingly, risk-taking was associated with decreased alcohol-related problems (B = −0.02, p = .008) and neither stress nor boredom independently predicted changes in alcohol use. Finally, several significant interactions suggested that those who were more impulsive and less bored were more likely to report increased alcohol use and vice versa. Conclusions: These data provide a nuanced overview of changes in drinking-related behavior during the COVID-19-induced period of social isolation. While most people reduced their drinking, there was evidence of complex interactions between impulsivity and boredom that may be explored in future studies.","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":"37 1","pages":"16 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2099543","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background: We aimed to assess whether stress, boredom, drinking motives, and/or inhibitory control were related to alcohol use during a period of social isolation. Method: Analyses were carried out on questionnaire data (N = 337) collected during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (7 April–3 May 2020). We first assessed changes in drinking behavior, stress and boredom. We then regressed drinking behavior on drinking motives, inhibitory control, stress, and boredom. We also investigated interactions between change in stress/boredom and inhibitory control. Results: A minority of respondents reported increased alcohol use (units = 23.52%, drinking days = 20.73%, heavy days = 7.06%), alcohol-related problems (9.67%), and stress (36.63%). Meanwhile, most respondents reported increased boredom (67.42%). Similarly, boredom significantly increased (B = 21.22, p < .001), on average, while alcohol-related problems decreased (B = −1.43 p < .001). Regarding drinking motives, decreased alcohol-related problems were associated with social drinking motives (B = −0.09, p = .005). Surprisingly, risk-taking was associated with decreased alcohol-related problems (B = −0.02, p = .008) and neither stress nor boredom independently predicted changes in alcohol use. Finally, several significant interactions suggested that those who were more impulsive and less bored were more likely to report increased alcohol use and vice versa. Conclusions: These data provide a nuanced overview of changes in drinking-related behavior during the COVID-19-induced period of social isolation. While most people reduced their drinking, there was evidence of complex interactions between impulsivity and boredom that may be explored in future studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社会隔离期间饮酒:调查压力、抑制控制、无聊、饮酒动机和酒精使用之间的关系
背景:我们旨在评估压力、无聊、饮酒动机和/或抑制控制是否与社会隔离期间的酒精使用有关。方法:对第一波COVID-19大流行(2020年4月7日- 5月3日)期间收集的问卷数据(N = 337)进行分析。我们首先评估了饮酒行为、压力和无聊的变化。然后,我们从饮酒动机、抑制控制、压力和无聊等方面对饮酒行为进行回归。我们还研究了压力/无聊变化和抑制控制之间的相互作用。结果:少数受访者报告酒精使用增加(单位= 23.52%,饮酒天数= 20.73%,重度天数= 7.06%),酒精相关问题(9.67%)和压力(36.63%)。与此同时,大多数受访者(67.42%)表示无聊感增加了。同样,无聊感显著增加(B = 21.22, p < .001),而酒精相关问题平均减少(B = - 1.43 p < .001)。关于饮酒动机,饮酒相关问题的减少与社交饮酒动机相关(B = - 0.09, p = 0.005)。令人惊讶的是,冒险行为与酒精相关问题的减少有关(B = - 0.02, p = 0.008),压力和无聊都不能独立预测酒精使用的变化。最后,几个重要的相互作用表明,那些更冲动、更不无聊的人更有可能报告饮酒增加,反之亦然。结论:这些数据为covid -19引起的社会隔离期间饮酒相关行为的变化提供了细微的概述。虽然大多数人减少了饮酒量,但有证据表明,冲动和无聊之间存在复杂的相互作用,这可能会在未来的研究中得到探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Can ‘justified disapproval’ be separated from addiction stigma? An empirical focus is required Do older adults drink alcohol whilst taking alcohol-interactive medication? Prevalence and ten-year mortality risk: findings from the UK Whitehall II cohort study Ambulatory assessment to advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization for commercial and Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid use disorder Does the lived experience of gambling accord with quantitative self-report scores of gambling-related harm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1