An Improbable Identification? The Netherlands as a “Reference Society” within the Chilean Educational Policy-Making Debate (2014–2015)

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Education Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10564934.2019.1694418
Cristina Alarcón
{"title":"An Improbable Identification? The Netherlands as a “Reference Society” within the Chilean Educational Policy-Making Debate (2014–2015)","authors":"Cristina Alarcón","doi":"10.1080/10564934.2019.1694418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper investigated a policy-making debate in Chile, by examining the construction of the Netherlands as a new “reference society”. It focused on a reform agenda that aimed at a transformation of the neo-liberal school governance model. Based on the analysis of government documents, parliamentary debates, and media materials, the paper concludes that in addition to the consideration of PISA results the identification with the Netherlands served fundamentally as a political compromise solution.","PeriodicalId":44727,"journal":{"name":"European Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2019.1694418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigated a policy-making debate in Chile, by examining the construction of the Netherlands as a new “reference society”. It focused on a reform agenda that aimed at a transformation of the neo-liberal school governance model. Based on the analysis of government documents, parliamentary debates, and media materials, the paper concludes that in addition to the consideration of PISA results the identification with the Netherlands served fundamentally as a political compromise solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不可能的鉴定?荷兰作为智利教育决策辩论中的“参考社会”(2014-2015)
摘要本文通过考察荷兰作为一个新的“参考社会”的建设,调查了智利的政策制定辩论。它侧重于旨在转变新自由主义学校治理模式的改革议程。基于对政府文件、议会辩论和媒体材料的分析,本文得出结论,除了考虑PISA结果外,与荷兰的认同从根本上说是一种政治妥协解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Education
European Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: uropean Education is published in association with the Comparative Education Society in Europe (CESE). It is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to original inquiries and dialogue on education across the member states of the Council of Europe. Established in 1969, the journal features articles on education in individual member states, comparative studies on education across Europe, as well as the impact of European education initiatives globally. The journal especially encourages theoretical and empirical studies, interdisciplinary perspectives, and critical examination of the impact of political, economic, and social forces on education. European Education includes reviews of books and educational films, including those published/produced in English and other languages.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Computer Availability on Student Achievement in Slovakia: Evidence from TIMSS and PIRLS Exploring Social Class Differences in Urban Parents’ School Choices in Kazakhstan Promoting Environmental Literacy: Nature’s Representation in Kindergarten Books Inclusion of Ukrainian Schoolchildren Seeking Refuge from the War into the Czech Education System Mapping Research on English as a Second or Foreign Language in Post-Soviet Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1