{"title":"Crisis múltiples, neodesarrollismo y megaproyectos en la región sureste de México","authors":"Rodríguez Wallenius, A. Carlos","doi":"10.3167/reco.2021.110304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English Abstract: This article analyzes the extractivist and dispossession modalities in the Mexican neodevelopmental proposal to face the multiple crises accentuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. With the qualitative narrative method applied to social processes, four infrastructure and extractivist megaprojects are analyzed. Neodevelopmental policies of the current government insist on carrying out works as a strategy to create jobs, reactivate the economy, and promote well-being, especially for the southeast region with high rates of socioeconomic inequality. The findings point to an increase in investment and job creation and a rejection by various communities and organizations that consider that their ways of life are being threatened by the efforts of the neodevelopmental government to build megaprojects before and during the pandemic. Spanish Abstract: Este articulo analiza las modalidades extractivistas y de despojo en la propuesta neodesarrollista mexicana para enfrentar las crisis multiples acentuadas por la pandemia de la COVID-19. Con el metodo cualitativo narrativo aplicado a procesos sociales, se analizan cuatro megaproyectos de infraestructura y extractivistas. Las politicas neodesarrollistas del gobierno actual insisten en realizar obras como una estrategia para crear empleos, reactivar la economia y fomentar el bienestar, especialmente para la region sureste con altos indices de desigualdad socioeconomica. Los hallazgos senalan un incremento en la inversion y en la generacion de empleos pero tambien un rechazo de varias comunidades y organizaciones que consideran que sus formas de vida estan siendo amenazadas frente a los esfuerzos del gobierno neodesarrollista por construir megaproyectos antes y durante la pandemia. English Abstract: This article analyzes the extractivist and dispossession modalities in the Mexican neodevelopmental proposal to face the multiple crises accentuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. With the qualitative narrative method applied to social processes, four infrastructure and extractivist megaprojects are analyzed. Neodevelopmental policies of the current government insist on carrying out works as a strategy to create jobs, reactivate the economy, and promote well-being, especially for the southeast region with high rates of socioeconomic inequality. The findings point to an increase in investment and job creation and a rejection by various communities and organizations that consider that their ways of life are being threatened by the efforts of the neodevelopmental government to build megaprojects before and during the pandemic. Spanish Abstract: Este articulo analiza las modalidades extractivistas y de despojo en la propuesta neodesarrollista mexicana para enfrentar las crisis multiples acentuadas por la pandemia de la COVID-19. Con el metodo cualitativo narrativo aplicado a procesos sociales, se analizan cuatro megaproyectos de infraestructura y extractivistas. Las politicas neodesarrollistas del gobierno actual insisten en realizar obras como una estrategia para crear empleos, reactivar la economia y fomentar el bienestar, especialmente para la region sureste con altos indices de desigualdad socioeconomica. Los hallazgos senalan un incremento en la inversion y en la generacion de empleos pero tambien un rechazo de varias comunidades y organizaciones que consideran que sus formas de vida estan siendo amenazadas frente a los esfuerzos del gobierno neodesarrollista por construir megaproyectos antes y durante la pandemia. French Abstract: Cet article analyse les modalites extractivistes et de depossession incluses dans la proposition neo-developpementaliste mexicaine afin de faire face aux crises multiples accentuees par la pandemie de Covid-19. Avec la methode narrative qualitative appliquee aux processus sociaux, quatre megaprojets d'infrastructures et d'extraction sont analyses. Les politiques neo-developpementalistes du gouvernement actuel insistent sur la realisation de travaux comme strategie pour creer des emplois, reactiver l'economi et promouvoir le bien-etre, en particulier pour la region du sud-est qui connait des taux eleves d'inegalites socio-economiques. Les resultats indiquent une augmentation des investissements et de la creation d'emplois, mais aussi un rejet de la part de diverses communautes et organisations qui considerent que leurs modes de vie sont menaces par les efforts du gouvernement neo-developpementaliste pour construire des megaprojets avant et pendant la pandemie. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Regions & Cohesion is the property of Berghahn Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)","PeriodicalId":37930,"journal":{"name":"Regions and Cohesion","volume":"12 1","pages":"33-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regions and Cohesion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2021.110304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
English Abstract: This article analyzes the extractivist and dispossession modalities in the Mexican neodevelopmental proposal to face the multiple crises accentuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. With the qualitative narrative method applied to social processes, four infrastructure and extractivist megaprojects are analyzed. Neodevelopmental policies of the current government insist on carrying out works as a strategy to create jobs, reactivate the economy, and promote well-being, especially for the southeast region with high rates of socioeconomic inequality. The findings point to an increase in investment and job creation and a rejection by various communities and organizations that consider that their ways of life are being threatened by the efforts of the neodevelopmental government to build megaprojects before and during the pandemic. Spanish Abstract: Este articulo analiza las modalidades extractivistas y de despojo en la propuesta neodesarrollista mexicana para enfrentar las crisis multiples acentuadas por la pandemia de la COVID-19. Con el metodo cualitativo narrativo aplicado a procesos sociales, se analizan cuatro megaproyectos de infraestructura y extractivistas. Las politicas neodesarrollistas del gobierno actual insisten en realizar obras como una estrategia para crear empleos, reactivar la economia y fomentar el bienestar, especialmente para la region sureste con altos indices de desigualdad socioeconomica. Los hallazgos senalan un incremento en la inversion y en la generacion de empleos pero tambien un rechazo de varias comunidades y organizaciones que consideran que sus formas de vida estan siendo amenazadas frente a los esfuerzos del gobierno neodesarrollista por construir megaproyectos antes y durante la pandemia. English Abstract: This article analyzes the extractivist and dispossession modalities in the Mexican neodevelopmental proposal to face the multiple crises accentuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. With the qualitative narrative method applied to social processes, four infrastructure and extractivist megaprojects are analyzed. Neodevelopmental policies of the current government insist on carrying out works as a strategy to create jobs, reactivate the economy, and promote well-being, especially for the southeast region with high rates of socioeconomic inequality. The findings point to an increase in investment and job creation and a rejection by various communities and organizations that consider that their ways of life are being threatened by the efforts of the neodevelopmental government to build megaprojects before and during the pandemic. Spanish Abstract: Este articulo analiza las modalidades extractivistas y de despojo en la propuesta neodesarrollista mexicana para enfrentar las crisis multiples acentuadas por la pandemia de la COVID-19. Con el metodo cualitativo narrativo aplicado a procesos sociales, se analizan cuatro megaproyectos de infraestructura y extractivistas. Las politicas neodesarrollistas del gobierno actual insisten en realizar obras como una estrategia para crear empleos, reactivar la economia y fomentar el bienestar, especialmente para la region sureste con altos indices de desigualdad socioeconomica. Los hallazgos senalan un incremento en la inversion y en la generacion de empleos pero tambien un rechazo de varias comunidades y organizaciones que consideran que sus formas de vida estan siendo amenazadas frente a los esfuerzos del gobierno neodesarrollista por construir megaproyectos antes y durante la pandemia. French Abstract: Cet article analyse les modalites extractivistes et de depossession incluses dans la proposition neo-developpementaliste mexicaine afin de faire face aux crises multiples accentuees par la pandemie de Covid-19. Avec la methode narrative qualitative appliquee aux processus sociaux, quatre megaprojets d'infrastructures et d'extraction sont analyses. Les politiques neo-developpementalistes du gouvernement actuel insistent sur la realisation de travaux comme strategie pour creer des emplois, reactiver l'economi et promouvoir le bien-etre, en particulier pour la region du sud-est qui connait des taux eleves d'inegalites socio-economiques. Les resultats indiquent une augmentation des investissements et de la creation d'emplois, mais aussi un rejet de la part de diverses communautes et organisations qui considerent que leurs modes de vie sont menaces par les efforts du gouvernement neo-developpementaliste pour construire des megaprojets avant et pendant la pandemie. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Regions & Cohesion is the property of Berghahn Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Regions and CohesionSocial Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍:
Regions & Cohesionis the journal of the Consortium for Comparative Research on Regional Integration and Social Cohesion (RISC), a cross-regional, interdisciplinary, and multilingual network of socially conscious and prestigious research institutes in Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on the human and environmental impacts of regional integration processes. It disseminates conceptual and empirical research (articles) and normative analysis (Leadership Forum) of topics related to human and environmental security, social cohesion, and governance. The journal facilitates a cross-regional intellectual dialogue on timely political, social and environmental issues from a regional perspective and is especially committed to publishing scholarship from emerging/transition countries and developing states. Its multilingual (English, Spanish and French) and interdisciplinary character contribute to the journal’s originality in providing an inclusive forum for scholars and practitioners in different world regions to engage in important international discussions related to sustainable human development. This dialogue reflects RISC’s mission of connecting scholars and practitioners from different world regions who otherwise would not have the opportunity to interact.