3D Laser Scanning for Thickness Measurements of Hull Structures

Xi-Ying Zhang, Charles Loader, Spencer Schilling, V. Hernández, K. Mcsweeney, H. Gu
{"title":"3D Laser Scanning for Thickness Measurements of Hull Structures","authors":"Xi-Ying Zhang, Charles Loader, Spencer Schilling, V. Hernández, K. Mcsweeney, H. Gu","doi":"10.1115/omae2021-63178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 3D scanning technology uses lasers to scan and capture object surfaces without physical surface contact. Laser scanning is gaining acceptance by many, including owners of marine or offshore assets as a viable inspection and validation method. Laser technology reduces operational times compared to traditional pit gauging techniques, particularly for large areas of widespread wastage or pitting. This paper studies the use of 3D scanning technology for inspection, thickness gauging, and steel wastage measurements of hull structures.\n Pilot tests were conducted on coated and uncorroded plates in Houston, USA, and uncoated and corroded plates and uncoated and deformed plates in Perth, Australia. Manual Ultrasonic Testing (UT) was conducted, which is the method currently accepted by International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) for thickness measurements of hull structures. For the coated plate, the coating thickness was measured on both sides of the plate. The coating thickness was deducted from the total thickness from 3D scanning before the plate thickness was compared with the UT results.\n Acceptance criteria are proposed to compare the Manual UT measurements with the 3D scanning measurements to determine if 3D laser scanning is a possible alternative thickness measurement method. The difference of thickness measurements from 3D scanning on coated and uncorroded plates is within 13% when compared with those from UT. The discrepancy is attributed to equipment accuracy tolerances, errors from data post-processing, and measurement errors due to coating surface roughness. For uncoated and corroded plates, the difference reduces to 3%, making the results of 3D scanning acceptable based on acceptance criteria. In addition, the higher accuracy of using 3D scanning to measure plate deformation is demonstrated over traditional methods which use stringlines or laser levels to create a reference surface. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) on all plates demonstrate the higher precision of 3D scanning technology than that of manual UT. The main limitation of 3D laser scanners is their inability to directly obtain steel thickness for structures that have been coated or painted, especially in watertight/oil-tight structures.\n The study identifies capabilities, accuracy, and limitations of using 3D scanning technology for thickness measurements of hull structures in the marine or offshore industries. Scanning technology can support inspections providing fast and precise means of thickness measurements of corroded plates without coating. It provides the potential for producing 3D models and analysis for follow-up inspections. Plausible use cases in the maritime industry include defect analysis, fitness for service assessment, damage assessment, and corrosion monitoring.","PeriodicalId":23502,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2021-63178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

3D scanning technology uses lasers to scan and capture object surfaces without physical surface contact. Laser scanning is gaining acceptance by many, including owners of marine or offshore assets as a viable inspection and validation method. Laser technology reduces operational times compared to traditional pit gauging techniques, particularly for large areas of widespread wastage or pitting. This paper studies the use of 3D scanning technology for inspection, thickness gauging, and steel wastage measurements of hull structures. Pilot tests were conducted on coated and uncorroded plates in Houston, USA, and uncoated and corroded plates and uncoated and deformed plates in Perth, Australia. Manual Ultrasonic Testing (UT) was conducted, which is the method currently accepted by International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) for thickness measurements of hull structures. For the coated plate, the coating thickness was measured on both sides of the plate. The coating thickness was deducted from the total thickness from 3D scanning before the plate thickness was compared with the UT results. Acceptance criteria are proposed to compare the Manual UT measurements with the 3D scanning measurements to determine if 3D laser scanning is a possible alternative thickness measurement method. The difference of thickness measurements from 3D scanning on coated and uncorroded plates is within 13% when compared with those from UT. The discrepancy is attributed to equipment accuracy tolerances, errors from data post-processing, and measurement errors due to coating surface roughness. For uncoated and corroded plates, the difference reduces to 3%, making the results of 3D scanning acceptable based on acceptance criteria. In addition, the higher accuracy of using 3D scanning to measure plate deformation is demonstrated over traditional methods which use stringlines or laser levels to create a reference surface. Comparisons of the coefficient of variation (CV) on all plates demonstrate the higher precision of 3D scanning technology than that of manual UT. The main limitation of 3D laser scanners is their inability to directly obtain steel thickness for structures that have been coated or painted, especially in watertight/oil-tight structures. The study identifies capabilities, accuracy, and limitations of using 3D scanning technology for thickness measurements of hull structures in the marine or offshore industries. Scanning technology can support inspections providing fast and precise means of thickness measurements of corroded plates without coating. It provides the potential for producing 3D models and analysis for follow-up inspections. Plausible use cases in the maritime industry include defect analysis, fitness for service assessment, damage assessment, and corrosion monitoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三维激光扫描船体结构厚度测量
3D扫描技术使用激光扫描和捕获物体表面,而不需要物理表面接触。激光扫描作为一种可行的检查和验证方法,正被许多人所接受,包括船舶或海上资产的所有者。与传统的凹坑测量技术相比,激光技术减少了操作时间,特别是对于大面积大面积的浪费或凹坑。本文研究了三维扫描技术在船体结构检测、测厚和耗钢测量中的应用。在美国休斯敦对涂层和未腐蚀的板进行了试点测试,在澳大利亚珀斯对未涂层和腐蚀的板和未涂层和变形的板进行了试点测试。手工超声检测(UT)是目前国际船级社协会(IACS)认可的船体结构厚度测量方法。对于涂层板,在板的两侧测量涂层厚度。在将板厚与UT结果进行比较之前,从3D扫描的总厚度中扣除涂层厚度。提出了验收标准,将手动UT测量与3D扫描测量进行比较,以确定3D激光扫描是否是一种可能的替代厚度测量方法。与UT相比,3D扫描在涂层和未腐蚀板上测量的厚度差异在13%以内。这种差异归因于设备精度公差、数据后处理误差以及涂层表面粗糙度引起的测量误差。对于未涂覆和腐蚀的板,差异减少到3%,使3D扫描结果符合验收标准。此外,使用3D扫描来测量板变形的精度比使用弦线或激光水平来创建参考表面的传统方法更高。对各板的变异系数(CV)的比较表明,三维扫描技术的精度高于手动UT。3D激光扫描仪的主要限制是无法直接获得涂层或油漆结构的钢材厚度,特别是在水密/油密结构中。该研究确定了在船舶或海上工业中使用3D扫描技术进行船体结构厚度测量的能力、准确性和局限性。扫描技术可以支持检测,为腐蚀板的厚度测量提供快速和精确的手段。它为后续检查提供了生成3D模型和分析的潜力。海运业中合理的用例包括缺陷分析、服务评估的适用性、损害评估和腐蚀监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance of the Inertial Components in Modal State Covariances Prelude FLNG Free Weathervaning Heading Prediction and Uncertainties, Based on Machine Learning Model Applying Open Web Architectures Towards Collaborative Maritime Design and Simulation Joint-Industry Effort to Develop and Verify CFD Modeling Practice for Predicting Wave Impact Dynamic Response of a Generic Self-Elevating Unit in Operation With Hull in Water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1