Problems of Applying Special Grounds for Exemption from Criminal Liability for Kidnapping

Tatiana Bersh, A. Khristyuk
{"title":"Problems of Applying Special Grounds for Exemption from Criminal Liability for Kidnapping","authors":"Tatiana Bersh, A. Khristyuk","doi":"10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(4).27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the positive attitude towards the presence of compromise norms in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, containing the possibility of exemption from criminal liability for a committed crime, their mere presence seems insufficient. It is important to introduce a mechanism for the functioning of the norms, which will describe in detail all the stages necessary for their application. The article discusses controversial issues of insufficient legislative regulation of exemption from criminal liability on the basis of the application of a note to Art. 126 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The opinions of scientists concerning the application of special grounds for exemption from criminal liability for kidnapping are generalized, the position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation regarding the understanding of the term “voluntary release of the kidnapped” is considered. A number of controversial issues that have not been taken into account by the legislator, which require mandatory regulation, are cited. The article examines the existing judicial practice of applying the note to Art. 126 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A lack of uniformity in the law enforcement activities of the judiciary was revealed. Supplements are proposed to the new resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 24, 2019 No. 58 to increase the effectiveness of the application of the considered grounds for exemption from criminal liability. As a result, a proposal was put forward that is aimed at improving the note to Art. 126 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The issues raised in the article are of scientific and practical interest.","PeriodicalId":8692,"journal":{"name":"Baikal Research Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baikal Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(4).27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite the positive attitude towards the presence of compromise norms in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, containing the possibility of exemption from criminal liability for a committed crime, their mere presence seems insufficient. It is important to introduce a mechanism for the functioning of the norms, which will describe in detail all the stages necessary for their application. The article discusses controversial issues of insufficient legislative regulation of exemption from criminal liability on the basis of the application of a note to Art. 126 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The opinions of scientists concerning the application of special grounds for exemption from criminal liability for kidnapping are generalized, the position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation regarding the understanding of the term “voluntary release of the kidnapped” is considered. A number of controversial issues that have not been taken into account by the legislator, which require mandatory regulation, are cited. The article examines the existing judicial practice of applying the note to Art. 126 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A lack of uniformity in the law enforcement activities of the judiciary was revealed. Supplements are proposed to the new resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 24, 2019 No. 58 to increase the effectiveness of the application of the considered grounds for exemption from criminal liability. As a result, a proposal was put forward that is aimed at improving the note to Art. 126 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The issues raised in the article are of scientific and practical interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绑架犯罪特殊事由免除刑事责任的适用问题
尽管对《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》中存在妥协规范持积极态度,其中载有对所犯罪行免除刑事责任的可能性,但仅仅存在这些规范似乎是不够的。重要的是引入一种规范运作的机制,它将详细描述其应用所必需的所有阶段。该条根据对《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第126条的一项说明的适用,讨论了关于免除刑事责任的立法规定不足的有争议的问题。概括了科学家们关于适用豁免绑架刑事责任的特殊理由的意见,并审议了俄罗斯联邦最高法院对“自愿释放被绑架者”一词的理解的立场。一些有争议的问题没有被立法者考虑到,这需要强制性的监管,被引用。本文审查了现行的适用《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第126条的说明的司法实践。司法机关的执法活动缺乏一致性。建议对俄罗斯联邦最高法院2019年12月24日第58号全体会议新决议进行补充,以提高所审议的免除刑事责任理由适用的有效性。因此,提出了一项建议,旨在改进对俄罗斯联邦刑法第126条的说明。文章中提出的问题具有科学和实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NP-Difficult Tasks: Automatic Proof of Theorems and Turings Machine Harnessing the Irkutsk Oblast Recreational Potential for the Innovation-Driven Growth the Region Improvement of the Adaptive Properties of the National Financial Market to Respond the Globalization Risks On the Frequency of Monitoring and Updating a Company's Strategic Business Development Plans Meaning of Life Crisis and Self-Attitude of Fetishistic Transvestites (Internet Research)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1