Cultural heritage and risk assessments: Gaps, challenges, and future research directions for the inclusion of heritage within climate change adaptation and disaster management

Kate Crowley, Rowan Jackson, Siona O'Connell, Dulma Karunarthna, Esti Anantasari, Arry Retnowati, Dominique Niemand
{"title":"Cultural heritage and risk assessments: Gaps, challenges, and future research directions for the inclusion of heritage within climate change adaptation and disaster management","authors":"Kate Crowley,&nbsp;Rowan Jackson,&nbsp;Siona O'Connell,&nbsp;Dulma Karunarthna,&nbsp;Esti Anantasari,&nbsp;Arry Retnowati,&nbsp;Dominique Niemand","doi":"10.1002/cli2.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cultural heritage shapes our identity, delivers capacities, and exposes vulnerabilities, yet cultural heritage value and vulnerability are largely missing from conventional risk assessments. Risk assessments are a fundamental first step in identifying effective mechanisms for Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and disaster management. However, by ignoring the influence of heritage, decision makers are limiting their understanding of risk and therefore opportunities vital for building and maintaining local resilience. We present findings from a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature from the last 15 years on cultural heritage risk assessment for primarily CCA but with wider implications for disaster management. We identify a significant lack of research examining intangible aspects of heritage and their influence on risk and resilience. Across the literature, risk assessments focus largely on exposure in isolation from vulnerability or adaptive capacity and where vulnerability is included there is no consistent definition or criterion. We highlight that the most frequently used methods have minimal engagement with local community values, experience, and knowledge relating to heritage practice and customs. Community engagement is most often associated with ‘professional experts’ rather than members of a local community. Furthermore, the Global South is severely under-represented with a research bias towards Europe and North America. We recommend an agile approach to future assessments with the adjustment of risk tool research and development to include participatory approaches. Future climate risk frameworks must incorporate community-scale values to understand the role of cultural heritage in relation to adaptive capacity, vulnerability, and resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":100261,"journal":{"name":"Climate Resilience and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cli2.45","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Resilience and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cli2.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Cultural heritage shapes our identity, delivers capacities, and exposes vulnerabilities, yet cultural heritage value and vulnerability are largely missing from conventional risk assessments. Risk assessments are a fundamental first step in identifying effective mechanisms for Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) and disaster management. However, by ignoring the influence of heritage, decision makers are limiting their understanding of risk and therefore opportunities vital for building and maintaining local resilience. We present findings from a synthesis of peer-reviewed literature from the last 15 years on cultural heritage risk assessment for primarily CCA but with wider implications for disaster management. We identify a significant lack of research examining intangible aspects of heritage and their influence on risk and resilience. Across the literature, risk assessments focus largely on exposure in isolation from vulnerability or adaptive capacity and where vulnerability is included there is no consistent definition or criterion. We highlight that the most frequently used methods have minimal engagement with local community values, experience, and knowledge relating to heritage practice and customs. Community engagement is most often associated with ‘professional experts’ rather than members of a local community. Furthermore, the Global South is severely under-represented with a research bias towards Europe and North America. We recommend an agile approach to future assessments with the adjustment of risk tool research and development to include participatory approaches. Future climate risk frameworks must incorporate community-scale values to understand the role of cultural heritage in relation to adaptive capacity, vulnerability, and resilience.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化遗产与风险评估:将文化遗产纳入气候变化适应和灾害管理的差距、挑战和未来研究方向
文化遗产塑造了我们的身份,提供了能力,暴露了脆弱性,但传统的风险评估在很大程度上忽略了文化遗产的价值和脆弱性。风险评估是确定气候变化适应(CCA)和灾害管理有效机制的基本第一步。然而,由于忽视遗产的影响,决策者限制了他们对风险的理解,从而限制了他们对建立和维持当地复原力至关重要的机会的理解。我们综合了过去15年的同行评议文献,主要针对CCA进行文化遗产风险评估,但对灾害管理具有更广泛的影响。我们发现,对遗产的非物质方面及其对风险和复原力的影响的研究明显缺乏。在所有文献中,风险评估主要侧重于与脆弱性或适应能力隔离的暴露,在包括脆弱性的情况下,没有一致的定义或标准。我们强调,最常用的方法与当地社区价值观、经验以及与遗产实践和习俗相关的知识的接触最少。社区参与通常与“专业专家”联系在一起,而不是当地社区的成员。此外,全球南方的代表性严重不足,研究偏向于欧洲和北美。我们建议对未来的评估采用敏捷方法,调整风险工具的研究和开发,纳入参与性方法。未来的气候风险框架必须纳入社区规模的价值观,以理解文化遗产在适应能力、脆弱性和复原力方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A call for action: Insights from the pre-COP28 scholarly discourse and beyond the operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund Issue Information The changing geography of wine climates and its implications on adaptation in the Italian Alps Issue Information Adaptive capacity of winter wheat to potential drought in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region under RCP8.5 scenario
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1