TU4.2 Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience

V. Butnari, A. Mansuri, S. Kaul, Joseph Huang, Rajendran Nirooshun
{"title":"TU4.2 Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience","authors":"V. Butnari, A. Mansuri, S. Kaul, Joseph Huang, Rajendran Nirooshun","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac248.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim To present our learning-curve data for patients that underwent robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RCRS) at a large NE London DGH. Methods We report our data from 50 initial colorectal cancer resections, performed by two surgeons. We report the gender, age, histopathology, surgery performed, surgical time, conversion, post-operative complications, and hospital stay. Results The first 50 patients who underwent RCRS between February 2020 and December 2021 for malignancy were included. Twenty-one were right hemicolectomies, 16 high anterior resection, 6 extended right hemicolectomies, 4 low anterior resections (including a planned robotic boari flap in 1 case by a trained urologist), 3 abdominoperineal excisions of rectum. The male to female ratio was 1:1 and the mean age was 65 (range: 22–85) years. The ASA class distribution was 4% ASA I, 64% ASA II, 32% ASA III. The median surgical time was 263 minutes (120–620) with median console time 136 minutes (50–540), the median hospital stay 5 days (range: 2–35) and a conversion rate of 6% (3/50 patients). The most common post-operative complications were ileus 4% (4/50), wound infection 6% (3/50), anastomotic leak 6% (3/50), and abscess formation 2% (1/50). 1 mortality occurred in a patient with an operated leak who contracted COVID-19. All patients underwent confirmed R0 resections with a negative CRM. Conclusion We report our first 50 robotic cases for colorectal malignancy, showing that robotic-assisted surgery can be performed with low rates of conversion 3 cases (6%) and low rates of post-operative complications despite a challenging patient demographic and a sharp learning curve.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac248.034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim To present our learning-curve data for patients that underwent robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RCRS) at a large NE London DGH. Methods We report our data from 50 initial colorectal cancer resections, performed by two surgeons. We report the gender, age, histopathology, surgery performed, surgical time, conversion, post-operative complications, and hospital stay. Results The first 50 patients who underwent RCRS between February 2020 and December 2021 for malignancy were included. Twenty-one were right hemicolectomies, 16 high anterior resection, 6 extended right hemicolectomies, 4 low anterior resections (including a planned robotic boari flap in 1 case by a trained urologist), 3 abdominoperineal excisions of rectum. The male to female ratio was 1:1 and the mean age was 65 (range: 22–85) years. The ASA class distribution was 4% ASA I, 64% ASA II, 32% ASA III. The median surgical time was 263 minutes (120–620) with median console time 136 minutes (50–540), the median hospital stay 5 days (range: 2–35) and a conversion rate of 6% (3/50 patients). The most common post-operative complications were ileus 4% (4/50), wound infection 6% (3/50), anastomotic leak 6% (3/50), and abscess formation 2% (1/50). 1 mortality occurred in a patient with an operated leak who contracted COVID-19. All patients underwent confirmed R0 resections with a negative CRM. Conclusion We report our first 50 robotic cases for colorectal malignancy, showing that robotic-assisted surgery can be performed with low rates of conversion 3 cases (6%) and low rates of post-operative complications despite a challenging patient demographic and a sharp learning curve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TU4.2结直肠癌机器人手术:单中心体验
摘要:目的介绍我们在伦敦东北部一家大型DGH接受机器人辅助结直肠手术(RCRS)患者的学习曲线数据。方法:我们报告了由两位外科医生进行的50例初次结直肠癌切除术的数据。我们报告性别、年龄、组织病理学、手术情况、手术时间、转换、术后并发症和住院时间。结果纳入了2020年2月至2021年12月期间因恶性肿瘤接受RCRS治疗的前50例患者。21例为右半结肠切除术,16例为高位前切除术,6例为扩大右半结肠切除术,4例为低位前切除术(包括1例由训练有素的泌尿科医生计划的机器人boari皮瓣),3例为腹会阴直肠切除术。男女比例为1:1,平均年龄65岁(22 ~ 85岁)。ASA分级分布为ASA I占4%,ASA II占64%,ASA III占32%。手术时间中位数为263分钟(120-620),坐诊时间中位数为136分钟(50-540),住院时间中位数为5天(范围:2-35),转换率为6%(3/50患者)。术后最常见的并发症为肠梗阻4%(4/50),伤口感染6%(3/50),吻合口漏6%(3/50),脓肿形成2%(1/50)。1例手术泄漏患者感染COVID-19死亡。所有患者均行R0切除,且CRM阴性。结论:我们报告了前50例机器人治疗结直肠恶性肿瘤的病例,表明尽管患者人口统计学具有挑战性和学习曲线陡峭,但机器人辅助手术的转换率(3例(6%))和术后并发症发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OC-022 MAINTAINING AN ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION SERVICE DURING THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC P-041 THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON ELECTIVE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE P-027 REDUCING SURGICAL WAIT TIMES FOR ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA OPERATIONS POST COVID-19 BY USING DEDICATED CLINICS OC-045 AMBULATORY HERNIA SURGERY IN PRIMARY CARE V-023 R-TAPP AS A TRAINING MODEL IN ROBOTIC SURGERY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1