I. Katsaros, V. Kyriakidis, E. Vafias, K. Athanassiou, C. Floros, M. Karakeke, S. Gkogkos, A. Kyriakidis
Abstract Background – Aim Inguinal hernia repair is among the most common surgical operations worldwide with over 20 million performed yearly. During the COVID-19 pandemic most elective hernia repairs were canceled, leading to potentially detrimental effects on the patients suffering from them. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on inguinal hernias and elucidate its consequences. Material & Methods Patients that underwent inguinal hernia repair at General Hospital of Amfissa from March 2018 to March 2022 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups before (Group A) and after (Group B) March 2020, the date on which the first lockdown was implemented in Greece. Results Overall, 407 patients (382 males & 25 females) with a mean age of 69 (24–93) were included in this study. A 27.5% decrease in total surgeries was found during the Group B (236 vs 171 patients), but emergency surgeries significantly increased (17.3% vs 43.9%). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant increase in strangulated cases (15.3% vs 40.4%) and cases warranting a bowel resection (13.6% vs 39.2%). Mean length of hospital stay also significantly increased over Group B period (1.69 vs 3.02 days). Conclusions Policies leading to cancelation of elective surgeries and reallocation of healthcare facilities in order to confront the COVID-19 pandemic have led to a significant delay in the management of inguinal hernias. Thus, a steep increase in emergency cases was observed, as a greater part of theses hernias are being left untreated and subsequently strangulated.
{"title":"P-041 THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON ELECTIVE INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE","authors":"I. Katsaros, V. Kyriakidis, E. Vafias, K. Athanassiou, C. Floros, M. Karakeke, S. Gkogkos, A. Kyriakidis","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac308.140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.140","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background – Aim Inguinal hernia repair is among the most common surgical operations worldwide with over 20 million performed yearly. During the COVID-19 pandemic most elective hernia repairs were canceled, leading to potentially detrimental effects on the patients suffering from them. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the pandemic on inguinal hernias and elucidate its consequences. Material & Methods Patients that underwent inguinal hernia repair at General Hospital of Amfissa from March 2018 to March 2022 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups before (Group A) and after (Group B) March 2020, the date on which the first lockdown was implemented in Greece. Results Overall, 407 patients (382 males & 25 females) with a mean age of 69 (24–93) were included in this study. A 27.5% decrease in total surgeries was found during the Group B (236 vs 171 patients), but emergency surgeries significantly increased (17.3% vs 43.9%). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant increase in strangulated cases (15.3% vs 40.4%) and cases warranting a bowel resection (13.6% vs 39.2%). Mean length of hospital stay also significantly increased over Group B period (1.69 vs 3.02 days). Conclusions Policies leading to cancelation of elective surgeries and reallocation of healthcare facilities in order to confront the COVID-19 pandemic have led to a significant delay in the management of inguinal hernias. Thus, a steep increase in emergency cases was observed, as a greater part of theses hernias are being left untreated and subsequently strangulated.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"396 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77481714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Background Specialization influences the way that surgeons deliver care and has a direct impact on doctors, healthcare systems and patients. Hernias impact around 2% of the population and repairs are among the most common procedures performed globally. The European Hernia Society recognizes a growing need for specialist surgeons as abdominal wall surgery becomes more complex with newer techniques and more challenging cases being encountered. At this trust, a new specialized hernia clinic was implemented in response to COVID backlogs and the growing need and proven benefits of specialization. The project's aim was to review the impact on procedure wait times and outcomes for hernia repairs. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing hernia repairs between June 2019 to June 2021 was compared to similar patients who attended the hernia clinic between February 2021 to March 2022. Included operations were inguinal, femoral, and umbilical hernia repairs. Data collected included diagnoses, percentage of day case and wait times. Results 59 patients underwent surgery pre-intervention with average wait times of 191 days. 72 post-intervention patients had an average wait of 59 days. 59 patients were still awaiting surgery post-clinic. Open surgery incidence increased from 66% to 79%. 86% of patients post-intervention were day cases, compared to 78% of pre-intervention patients. Conclusions The new hernia clinic has reduced wait times for surgery and improved day-case rates despite more cases being performed as open procedures. Following these results, the clinic system shows great promise and hernia surgery has the potential to evolve as a sub-specialty.
{"title":"P-027 REDUCING SURGICAL WAIT TIMES FOR ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA OPERATIONS POST COVID-19 BY USING DEDICATED CLINICS","authors":"M. Renna, S. Lyon, J. Sindhar, H. Ebied","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac308.127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.127","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Specialization influences the way that surgeons deliver care and has a direct impact on doctors, healthcare systems and patients. Hernias impact around 2% of the population and repairs are among the most common procedures performed globally. The European Hernia Society recognizes a growing need for specialist surgeons as abdominal wall surgery becomes more complex with newer techniques and more challenging cases being encountered. At this trust, a new specialized hernia clinic was implemented in response to COVID backlogs and the growing need and proven benefits of specialization. The project's aim was to review the impact on procedure wait times and outcomes for hernia repairs. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing hernia repairs between June 2019 to June 2021 was compared to similar patients who attended the hernia clinic between February 2021 to March 2022. Included operations were inguinal, femoral, and umbilical hernia repairs. Data collected included diagnoses, percentage of day case and wait times. Results 59 patients underwent surgery pre-intervention with average wait times of 191 days. 72 post-intervention patients had an average wait of 59 days. 59 patients were still awaiting surgery post-clinic. Open surgery incidence increased from 66% to 79%. 86% of patients post-intervention were day cases, compared to 78% of pre-intervention patients. Conclusions The new hernia clinic has reduced wait times for surgery and improved day-case rates despite more cases being performed as open procedures. Following these results, the clinic system shows great promise and hernia surgery has the potential to evolve as a sub-specialty.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78344821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
N. Kumaran, S. Bylapudi, S. Kirmani, G. L. Hodgson, A. Tennakoon, M. Rao
Abstract Background Approximately 100,000 hernia repairs are performed in the UK annually, the vast majority in hospital usually under general anaesthetic. Due to increased pressure on hospital facilities especially after the COVID-19 pandemic the waiting times for non-emergency surgery for benign conditions has increased. This study outlines the development and feasibility of a dedicated ambulatory primary care hernia service and examines the outcomes achieved between November 2018 and November 2021. Methods We prospectively analysed of records of 212 patients who underwent hernia repair in a primary care centre during the above period. Inclusion criteria were a) BMI<35 b) uncomplicated inguinal or umbilical hernia c) non recurrent hernia. The techniques used were Lichtenstein mesh repair for inguinal hernias and a primary sutured repair for ventral hernias. All procedures were performed as day-cases under local anaesthesia without sedation. All patients were telephoned by a healthcare professional a day after their operation. The primary outcomes of the study were length of stay, immediate complications and the secondary outcome was cost effectiveness. Results The median length of post-operative stay was 26 minutes. Complications were low and seen only in 5 patients and managed conservatively. The cost of hernia repair in primary care in UK is only £1012 when compared to £1800 in an NHS hospital. Conclusion Routine elective abdominal wall hernia repairs can be performed in a primary care setting, safely, with good clinical outcomes and clear economic benefits. However, this depends on the availability of surgeons and adequate funds to establish the service.
{"title":"OC-045 AMBULATORY HERNIA SURGERY IN PRIMARY CARE","authors":"N. Kumaran, S. Bylapudi, S. Kirmani, G. L. Hodgson, A. Tennakoon, M. Rao","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac308.057","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.057","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Approximately 100,000 hernia repairs are performed in the UK annually, the vast majority in hospital usually under general anaesthetic. Due to increased pressure on hospital facilities especially after the COVID-19 pandemic the waiting times for non-emergency surgery for benign conditions has increased. This study outlines the development and feasibility of a dedicated ambulatory primary care hernia service and examines the outcomes achieved between November 2018 and November 2021. Methods We prospectively analysed of records of 212 patients who underwent hernia repair in a primary care centre during the above period. Inclusion criteria were a) BMI<35 b) uncomplicated inguinal or umbilical hernia c) non recurrent hernia. The techniques used were Lichtenstein mesh repair for inguinal hernias and a primary sutured repair for ventral hernias. All procedures were performed as day-cases under local anaesthesia without sedation. All patients were telephoned by a healthcare professional a day after their operation. The primary outcomes of the study were length of stay, immediate complications and the secondary outcome was cost effectiveness. Results The median length of post-operative stay was 26 minutes. Complications were low and seen only in 5 patients and managed conservatively. The cost of hernia repair in primary care in UK is only £1012 when compared to £1800 in an NHS hospital. Conclusion Routine elective abdominal wall hernia repairs can be performed in a primary care setting, safely, with good clinical outcomes and clear economic benefits. However, this depends on the availability of surgeons and adequate funds to establish the service.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79228502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Dixon, A. Benson, R. Kalaiselvan, S. Kanwar, A. Samad, R. Pritchard-Jones, C. West, M. Scott
Abstract Aim Elective surgery services suffered significantly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact and outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, assessing safety and sustainability. Material and Methods A retrospective review of all patients undergoing AWR in a single NHS trust, multiple surgeons, between 23rd March 2020 and 22rd March 2022, the 2 years following U.K. Government imposed lockdown, was undertaken and compared with the pre-pandemic AWR activity. Procedures were initially undertaken at a cold site and when demonstrated to be safe, main site operating restarted. The primary outcome was 90 day mortality, secondary outcomes of COVID-19 infection within 7 days, length of stay, critical care requirement, and complication rate. Results In the study period, 173 patients underwent AWR, compared with 99 cases in a single year preceding lockdown. 90 day mortality rate was zero. No patients returned positive COVID tests to the trust within 7 days of AWR, and no patients were readmitted for COVID related symptoms. Critical care admission was required in 7 patients, 3 of these were planned admissions pre-operatively. The surgical site occurrence rate was 9.8% (17), infection 5.8% (10), seroma 2.3% (4) and haematoma 1.7% (3). There were no recurrences reported, with follow up ranging between 1 and 18 months. Conclusion Continuing AWR services during the COVID pandemic is feasible and safe. Peri-operative COVID infection rates are low, critical care requirements minimal, and there is no impact on patient morbidity or mortality.
{"title":"OC-022 MAINTAINING AN ELECTIVE ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION SERVICE DURING THE COVID 19 PANDEMIC","authors":"S. Dixon, A. Benson, R. Kalaiselvan, S. Kanwar, A. Samad, R. Pritchard-Jones, C. West, M. Scott","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac308.034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.034","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim Elective surgery services suffered significantly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact and outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, assessing safety and sustainability. Material and Methods A retrospective review of all patients undergoing AWR in a single NHS trust, multiple surgeons, between 23rd March 2020 and 22rd March 2022, the 2 years following U.K. Government imposed lockdown, was undertaken and compared with the pre-pandemic AWR activity. Procedures were initially undertaken at a cold site and when demonstrated to be safe, main site operating restarted. The primary outcome was 90 day mortality, secondary outcomes of COVID-19 infection within 7 days, length of stay, critical care requirement, and complication rate. Results In the study period, 173 patients underwent AWR, compared with 99 cases in a single year preceding lockdown. 90 day mortality rate was zero. No patients returned positive COVID tests to the trust within 7 days of AWR, and no patients were readmitted for COVID related symptoms. Critical care admission was required in 7 patients, 3 of these were planned admissions pre-operatively. The surgical site occurrence rate was 9.8% (17), infection 5.8% (10), seroma 2.3% (4) and haematoma 1.7% (3). There were no recurrences reported, with follow up ranging between 1 and 18 months. Conclusion Continuing AWR services during the COVID pandemic is feasible and safe. Peri-operative COVID infection rates are low, critical care requirements minimal, and there is no impact on patient morbidity or mortality.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72545384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Aim The incidence of paraoesphageal hiatus hernia (PEH) has changed over the last several years. This study aims to ascertain the difference in the presentation of PEH requiring operative intervention at our unit because of the COVID-19 pandemic Material & Methods We conducted a retrospective review of procedures performed by a single surgeon for PEH in a district general hospital. We compared cases from 2016 to March 2020 and during the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Results 39 consecutive cases were identified undergoing PEH related procedures. The median age was 66 (IQR 26), with slight female predominance (M:F ratio of 5:6). 28 cases (71.8%) were performed as elective cases. After the 2020 March lockdown, there were 10 cases of PEH repair performed with 78% performed as emergency procedures, compared to 30 cases in the preceding 5 years and 10% performed as emergency cases. Chi-square test to examine the association between COVID-19 pandemic and emergency procedure, X2(1, N=39)=14.199, p=0.000164. Pre-COVID19 the types of procedures included 76.7% were fundoplication with suture crural closure, 10% were fundoplication with mesh repair, 3.3% biological mesh repair, 3.3% with suture closure of the crural and 6.7% had suture gastropexy. During the COVID-19 period, 44.4% were gastropexy, 33.3% were gastrostomy tube insertion and 22.2% fundoplication performed. Conclusion We have seen significantly more emergency PEH related procedures performed and using a variety of procedures. This leads to the consideration of whether current emergency general surgery training can equip trainees for future independent practice.
{"title":"OC-052 A CHANGE IN PRESENTATION OF PARAOESOPHAGEAL HIATUS HERNIA REQUIRING SURGICAL INTERVENTION IN A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL IN THE NORTHERN REGION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM","authors":"E. Chen, C. Ng, Z. Toumi","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac308.064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.064","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim The incidence of paraoesphageal hiatus hernia (PEH) has changed over the last several years. This study aims to ascertain the difference in the presentation of PEH requiring operative intervention at our unit because of the COVID-19 pandemic Material & Methods We conducted a retrospective review of procedures performed by a single surgeon for PEH in a district general hospital. We compared cases from 2016 to March 2020 and during the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Results 39 consecutive cases were identified undergoing PEH related procedures. The median age was 66 (IQR 26), with slight female predominance (M:F ratio of 5:6). 28 cases (71.8%) were performed as elective cases. After the 2020 March lockdown, there were 10 cases of PEH repair performed with 78% performed as emergency procedures, compared to 30 cases in the preceding 5 years and 10% performed as emergency cases. Chi-square test to examine the association between COVID-19 pandemic and emergency procedure, X2(1, N=39)=14.199, p=0.000164. Pre-COVID19 the types of procedures included 76.7% were fundoplication with suture crural closure, 10% were fundoplication with mesh repair, 3.3% biological mesh repair, 3.3% with suture closure of the crural and 6.7% had suture gastropexy. During the COVID-19 period, 44.4% were gastropexy, 33.3% were gastrostomy tube insertion and 22.2% fundoplication performed. Conclusion We have seen significantly more emergency PEH related procedures performed and using a variety of procedures. This leads to the consideration of whether current emergency general surgery training can equip trainees for future independent practice.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87786922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Costa, E. Monti, L. Latham, A. Marzorati, M. Odeh, E. Colombo, A. Ballabio, M. Zanchetta, D. Inversini, G. Ietto, G. Carcano
Abstract Introduction Diaphragmatic hernias (DH) in most cases are the consequence of a diaphragmatic trauma causing a missed injury. Less frequently, DHs are congenital. Case Presentation A 52 years old patient came to our attention due to a worsening severe dyspnea. A chest CT scan were performed, showing an extensive left-side DH. We present the video of the surgical procedure. The patient mentioned a severe left hemithorax trauma occurred almost twenty years before due to a motorbike accident. Possibly, a diaphragmatic injury was not diagnosed at the time. Subsequently, a Covid-19-related chronic cough resulting in a persistently increased intra abdominal pressure may have caused the herniation of abdominal viscera. The surgical procedure was laparoscopic. The whole greater omentum and most of the transverse colon were herniated and, after a thorough adhesiolysis between the herniated tissues and the left diaphragmatic crus, the DH was reduced. It was confirmed the presence of a 8 cm defect of the left hemidiaphragm, it was repaired with a absorbable continuous suture. A 08×10 cm Bio-A patch was positioned over. The herniated tissues were meticulously examined and showed no signs of damage. Conclusions Diaphragm's injuries are unfortunately difficult to diagnose in an acute setting, thus remaining often unbeknownst to the surgeon. Some patients never develop any symptoms because of such missed diaphragmatic injuries. Some others instead, due to an increase in the intra abdominal pressure, may develop symptomatic DHs. In the latter case, surgical management becomes mandatory.
摘要简介膈疝(DH)在大多数情况下是由于膈外伤导致漏伤的结果。少数情况下，DHs是先天性的。一例52岁患者因严重呼吸困难恶化而入院。胸部CT扫描显示广泛的左侧DH。我们播放手术过程的录像。病人提到大约20年前由于摩托车事故造成严重的左半胸外伤。当时可能没有诊断出膈肌损伤。随后，与covid -19相关的慢性咳嗽导致腹内压持续升高，可能导致腹部脏器疝出。手术是腹腔镜手术。整个大网膜和大部分横结肠疝出，疝出组织与左膈脚间彻底粘连松解后，DH降低。经证实左膈有8厘米缺损，采用可吸收连续缝线修复。放置08×10 cm Bio-A贴片。对疝出的组织进行了细致的检查，没有发现损伤的迹象。结论膈肌损伤在急性情况下很难诊断，因此外科医生通常不知道膈肌损伤。有些病人由于膈肌损伤的遗漏而没有任何症状。另一些人，由于腹内压力增加，可能会出现症状性DHs。在后一种情况下，手术治疗成为强制性的。
{"title":"V-046 LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF AN HUGE DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA","authors":"J. Costa, E. Monti, L. Latham, A. Marzorati, M. Odeh, E. Colombo, A. Ballabio, M. Zanchetta, D. Inversini, G. Ietto, G. Carcano","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac308.298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.298","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Diaphragmatic hernias (DH) in most cases are the consequence of a diaphragmatic trauma causing a missed injury. Less frequently, DHs are congenital. Case Presentation A 52 years old patient came to our attention due to a worsening severe dyspnea. A chest CT scan were performed, showing an extensive left-side DH. We present the video of the surgical procedure. The patient mentioned a severe left hemithorax trauma occurred almost twenty years before due to a motorbike accident. Possibly, a diaphragmatic injury was not diagnosed at the time. Subsequently, a Covid-19-related chronic cough resulting in a persistently increased intra abdominal pressure may have caused the herniation of abdominal viscera. The surgical procedure was laparoscopic. The whole greater omentum and most of the transverse colon were herniated and, after a thorough adhesiolysis between the herniated tissues and the left diaphragmatic crus, the DH was reduced. It was confirmed the presence of a 8 cm defect of the left hemidiaphragm, it was repaired with a absorbable continuous suture. A 08×10 cm Bio-A patch was positioned over. The herniated tissues were meticulously examined and showed no signs of damage. Conclusions Diaphragm's injuries are unfortunately difficult to diagnose in an acute setting, thus remaining often unbeknownst to the surgeon. Some patients never develop any symptoms because of such missed diaphragmatic injuries. Some others instead, due to an increase in the intra abdominal pressure, may develop symptomatic DHs. In the latter case, surgical management becomes mandatory.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87201606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Esposito, F. Pecchini, G. Casoni Pattacini, V. Trapani, D. Gozzo, M. Piccoli
Abstract Aim The main aim of the project will be evaluating the effectiveness of an experimental structured didactic program in robotic surgery in filling the training gap caused by the pandemic. We intend to evaluate how establishing a training pathway could improve young surgeons’ robotic skills and implement their participation in robotic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. We will also evaluate the learning curve of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) for young surgeons with limited experience as first operators at the dual console. Matherials and Methods We designed an experimental stepwise training program in robotic surgery that starts from a first step of theoretical and laboratory lessons, followed by a second phase of bedside assistance training, and finally the completion of low complexity procedures by the trainees proctored at the dual console by senior surgeons. Robotic TAPP was selected as training model. The performance of each trainee will be registered in an evaluation data sheet and Learning scores will be recorded by the tutor with the evaluation of 6 corner steps of the procedure. Results Preliminary results showed improved technical skills and increased team spirit and wellbeing. Conclusions TAPP is a good training model because involves technical steps useful for more complex procedures. The robotic dual console represent an extraordinary training tool and a structured training program positively impacts technical skills and could help filling the training gap caused by the pandemic.
{"title":"V-023 R-TAPP AS A TRAINING MODEL IN ROBOTIC SURGERY","authors":"S. Esposito, F. Pecchini, G. Casoni Pattacini, V. Trapani, D. Gozzo, M. Piccoli","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac308.275","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac308.275","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim The main aim of the project will be evaluating the effectiveness of an experimental structured didactic program in robotic surgery in filling the training gap caused by the pandemic. We intend to evaluate how establishing a training pathway could improve young surgeons’ robotic skills and implement their participation in robotic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. We will also evaluate the learning curve of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) for young surgeons with limited experience as first operators at the dual console. Matherials and Methods We designed an experimental stepwise training program in robotic surgery that starts from a first step of theoretical and laboratory lessons, followed by a second phase of bedside assistance training, and finally the completion of low complexity procedures by the trainees proctored at the dual console by senior surgeons. Robotic TAPP was selected as training model. The performance of each trainee will be registered in an evaluation data sheet and Learning scores will be recorded by the tutor with the evaluation of 6 corner steps of the procedure. Results Preliminary results showed improved technical skills and increased team spirit and wellbeing. Conclusions TAPP is a good training model because involves technical steps useful for more complex procedures. The robotic dual console represent an extraordinary training tool and a structured training program positively impacts technical skills and could help filling the training gap caused by the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"129 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80248438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ntirwa Sekyi-Djan, C. Chapple, T. Myuran, Amy Hammond-Kenny, A. Hilger
{"title":"Corrigendum to: The use of ARTISS fibrin sealant in thyroid surgery: case series and review of the literature.","authors":"Ntirwa Sekyi-Djan, C. Chapple, T. Myuran, Amy Hammond-Kenny, A. Hilger","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac303","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78096482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Aim The SHO led acute ENT clinic is used to assess and treat a variety of ENT pathology. Following the COVID19 pandemic, the department has seen an increase in referrals for conditions that do not meet departmental guidelines. To meet demand, our clinics were always overbooked and over running as juniors sought help from seniors for more complex referrals. Method A quality improvement project was initially set to be performed over a few months; however, due to COVID, data was collected over a year from December 2019 to 2020. We looked specifically at number of patients referred, reason for referral, number of follow-up appointments, senior review required and how COVID affected the running of the clinics. Results Compared with the clinic's standard operating procedure, 77.2% of clinics were overbooked and 69.8% of patients had unsuitable referrals. This prompted changes such as increasing clinic capacity by introducing full day clinics and increasing senior support by moving to the outpatient department, then clinics were only overbooked 1% of the time. Other areas for improvement highlighted such as advice given to patients as well as referral to main ENT clinic. Conclusion It was clear that the capacity of the acute clinic did not meet demand, and this was needed to ensure patient safety and adhere to ENT UK guidance. We implemented a more stringent referral system to increase patient safety by ensuring patients with appropriate pathology are seen in this clinic or referred to other relevant clinics where they can be seen earlier by seniors.
{"title":"432 Improving the Use of Acute ENT Clinic in a DGH During the COVID19 Pandemic","authors":"S. Bondje, L. Bateman, J. Stephens","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac269.338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac269.338","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim The SHO led acute ENT clinic is used to assess and treat a variety of ENT pathology. Following the COVID19 pandemic, the department has seen an increase in referrals for conditions that do not meet departmental guidelines. To meet demand, our clinics were always overbooked and over running as juniors sought help from seniors for more complex referrals. Method A quality improvement project was initially set to be performed over a few months; however, due to COVID, data was collected over a year from December 2019 to 2020. We looked specifically at number of patients referred, reason for referral, number of follow-up appointments, senior review required and how COVID affected the running of the clinics. Results Compared with the clinic's standard operating procedure, 77.2% of clinics were overbooked and 69.8% of patients had unsuitable referrals. This prompted changes such as increasing clinic capacity by introducing full day clinics and increasing senior support by moving to the outpatient department, then clinics were only overbooked 1% of the time. Other areas for improvement highlighted such as advice given to patients as well as referral to main ENT clinic. Conclusion It was clear that the capacity of the acute clinic did not meet demand, and this was needed to ensure patient safety and adhere to ENT UK guidance. We implemented a more stringent referral system to increase patient safety by ensuring patients with appropriate pathology are seen in this clinic or referred to other relevant clinics where they can be seen earlier by seniors.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72765772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Background Dermal fillers can be used to improve cosmetic appearance of facial soft tissue in patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) associated lipodystrophy. There are documented cases of delayed hypersensitivity reaction to dermal fillers following influenza-like illness, and similarly following coronavirus vaccination, however none following the influenza vaccine. Case A 52-year-old female was treated with dermal filler injections to her zygomatic and buccal regions for lipoatrophy secondary to HIV treatment. Her HIV was well controlled with a low viral load. Six months following dermal filler treatment she presented with periorbital and zygomatic arch swellings one week after vaccination for influenza. The swelling was initially treated as periorbital cellulitis with antibiotics; however, it did not resolve. The swelling was in the same distribution as her filler and as it did not appear to be an infection but rather a delayed hypersensitivity reaction, it was treated with prednisolone for one week. There was further reduction in nodules following intralesional triamcinolone injections and following weaning of prednisolone there was no recurrence of swelling. Discussion To our knowledge this is the first case of its type to be described; literature searching does not retrieve any reports to date of adverse events related to the influenza vaccine following the use of dermal fillers. This is an important consideration in terms of the risks posed by this treatment in immunocompromised patients, and detailed informed consent is an important component of treatment.
{"title":"811 Dermal Fillers and Delayed Hypersensitivity Following Influenza Vaccine: A Case Report","authors":"H. Magill, L. Ioannidi, J. Collier","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac269.162","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac269.162","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Dermal fillers can be used to improve cosmetic appearance of facial soft tissue in patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) associated lipodystrophy. There are documented cases of delayed hypersensitivity reaction to dermal fillers following influenza-like illness, and similarly following coronavirus vaccination, however none following the influenza vaccine. Case A 52-year-old female was treated with dermal filler injections to her zygomatic and buccal regions for lipoatrophy secondary to HIV treatment. Her HIV was well controlled with a low viral load. Six months following dermal filler treatment she presented with periorbital and zygomatic arch swellings one week after vaccination for influenza. The swelling was initially treated as periorbital cellulitis with antibiotics; however, it did not resolve. The swelling was in the same distribution as her filler and as it did not appear to be an infection but rather a delayed hypersensitivity reaction, it was treated with prednisolone for one week. There was further reduction in nodules following intralesional triamcinolone injections and following weaning of prednisolone there was no recurrence of swelling. Discussion To our knowledge this is the first case of its type to be described; literature searching does not retrieve any reports to date of adverse events related to the influenza vaccine following the use of dermal fillers. This is an important consideration in terms of the risks posed by this treatment in immunocompromised patients, and detailed informed consent is an important component of treatment.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75450632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：