Occupational Therapy within the Response to Intervention Team: Focus Group Identifies Opportunities and Barriers

S. L. de Sam Lazaro, Bonnie R W Riley
{"title":"Occupational Therapy within the Response to Intervention Team: Focus Group Identifies Opportunities and Barriers","authors":"S. L. de Sam Lazaro, Bonnie R W Riley","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2022.2048428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Evidence indicates that universal screening can support academic participation. Response to Intervention (RtI) is a model that has been designed to identify student needs and support them within the academic setting. A focus group was held with 20 school-based occupational therapy practitioners to explore the existing role of occupational therapy within different tiers of intervention and identify barriers and further opportunities for collaborating on interdisciplinary teams. Four themes emerged identifying 1) Developmental, academic, and health-related needs, 2) Key periods for universal screening, 3) Communication and systematic barriers in interdisciplinary collaboration, and 4) Lack of identified roles for occupational therapy practitioners within RtI teams. Findings of the focus group indicate a need for advocacy using data to establish the occupational therapy role across all RtI levels. Through advocacy efforts, role release, and interdisciplinary knowledge sharing opportunities can support students during academic participation.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"7 1","pages":"295 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2022.2048428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evidence indicates that universal screening can support academic participation. Response to Intervention (RtI) is a model that has been designed to identify student needs and support them within the academic setting. A focus group was held with 20 school-based occupational therapy practitioners to explore the existing role of occupational therapy within different tiers of intervention and identify barriers and further opportunities for collaborating on interdisciplinary teams. Four themes emerged identifying 1) Developmental, academic, and health-related needs, 2) Key periods for universal screening, 3) Communication and systematic barriers in interdisciplinary collaboration, and 4) Lack of identified roles for occupational therapy practitioners within RtI teams. Findings of the focus group indicate a need for advocacy using data to establish the occupational therapy role across all RtI levels. Through advocacy efforts, role release, and interdisciplinary knowledge sharing opportunities can support students during academic participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对干预小组的反应中的职业治疗:焦点小组识别机会和障碍
证据表明,普遍筛查可以支持学术参与。干预反应(RtI)是一种模型,旨在确定学生的需求,并在学术环境中为他们提供支持。与20名校本职业治疗执业人员举行焦点小组讨论,探讨职业治疗在不同层次的干预措施中现有的作用,并找出跨学科团队合作的障碍和进一步的机会。出现了四个主题:1)发展、学术和健康相关需求;2)普遍筛查的关键时期;3)跨学科合作中的沟通和系统障碍;4)RtI团队中职业治疗从业者缺乏明确的角色。焦点小组的研究结果表明,需要利用数据来倡导在所有RtI水平上建立职业治疗的作用。通过倡导努力,角色释放和跨学科知识共享机会可以支持学生在学术参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let down by Low Expectations: A Qualitative Interview/participatory Photography Study of Feeding Problems in Autistic Children Executive Functioning in the Schools: Perspectives from Occupational Therapists Occupational therapy intervention to address handwriting deficit in elementary-aged school children: How to, how much, and how often? A scoping review A Pilot Study on Efficacy of a Play-Based Social Skills Training Group for First-Grade Elementary Children with Autism in Taiwan How can we evaluate collaborative practices in inclusive schools? Challenges and proposed solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1