Effect of bioslurries on tomato Solanum lycopersicum L and lettuce Lactuca sativa development

Ivan Funes Pinter, M. Salomón, J. N. Martín, E. Uliarte, A. Hidalgo
{"title":"Effect of bioslurries on tomato Solanum lycopersicum L and lettuce Lactuca sativa development","authors":"Ivan Funes Pinter, M. Salomón, J. N. Martín, E. Uliarte, A. Hidalgo","doi":"10.48162/rev.39.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBioslurries, obtained by anaerobic digestion of fresh organic matter, are emerging as a cheaper and low-impact alternative for synthetic products in agriculture. The aim of this study was to evaluate bioslurry obtained from biogas digestion (Biog), bioslurry for plant nutrition by FAO (Bfao), and lactic fermentation (Blac) as biostimulant in tomato and lettuce plants. Based on a toxicity test, a 10% dilution was finally applied to the plants. In lettuce, Bfao and Blac significantly increased aerial biomass (2.17 ±0.54 and 2.33 ±1.13 g respectively), regarding water control (1.16 ±0.60 g), while root biomass was only increased by Bfao (1.60 ±0.44 g) compared to control (0.66 ±0.34 g). All digestates increased chlorophyll content index (CCI), while yield (Fv/Fm) and performance index (Plabs) did not show differences with water control. In tomato, only aerial biomass was significantly increased by Bfao. All digestates significantly increased CCI, while Fv/Fm was only significantly higher in Bfao and Blac, related to water control. PIabs showed no differences. In both plant species, commercial fertilizer showed significantly higher values for all parameters. In conclusion, all digestates stimulated plant growth, Bfao showed the highest effect on tomatoes and lettuce biomass followed by Blac and Biog, being a cheaper, safer and lower-impact alternative for traditional products for crop growing.\nHighlights\n\nDigestates are valuable by-products, with different characteristics and effects on plant biomass, suggesting complex interactions.\nAll digestates stimulated tomatoes and lettuce growth.\nThe digestate designed by FAO showed the highest effect on plant biomass, constituting an adequate alternative for a cheaper, safer and low-impact strategy for crop growth.\n","PeriodicalId":21210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioslurries, obtained by anaerobic digestion of fresh organic matter, are emerging as a cheaper and low-impact alternative for synthetic products in agriculture. The aim of this study was to evaluate bioslurry obtained from biogas digestion (Biog), bioslurry for plant nutrition by FAO (Bfao), and lactic fermentation (Blac) as biostimulant in tomato and lettuce plants. Based on a toxicity test, a 10% dilution was finally applied to the plants. In lettuce, Bfao and Blac significantly increased aerial biomass (2.17 ±0.54 and 2.33 ±1.13 g respectively), regarding water control (1.16 ±0.60 g), while root biomass was only increased by Bfao (1.60 ±0.44 g) compared to control (0.66 ±0.34 g). All digestates increased chlorophyll content index (CCI), while yield (Fv/Fm) and performance index (Plabs) did not show differences with water control. In tomato, only aerial biomass was significantly increased by Bfao. All digestates significantly increased CCI, while Fv/Fm was only significantly higher in Bfao and Blac, related to water control. PIabs showed no differences. In both plant species, commercial fertilizer showed significantly higher values for all parameters. In conclusion, all digestates stimulated plant growth, Bfao showed the highest effect on tomatoes and lettuce biomass followed by Blac and Biog, being a cheaper, safer and lower-impact alternative for traditional products for crop growing. Highlights Digestates are valuable by-products, with different characteristics and effects on plant biomass, suggesting complex interactions. All digestates stimulated tomatoes and lettuce growth. The digestate designed by FAO showed the highest effect on plant biomass, constituting an adequate alternative for a cheaper, safer and low-impact strategy for crop growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物浆液对番茄茄和生菜发育的影响
通过厌氧消化新鲜有机物质而获得的生物浆,正在成为农业合成产品的一种更便宜和低影响的替代品。本研究的目的是评价沼气消化(Biog)、FAO植物营养生物浆(Bfao)和乳酸发酵(Blac)获得的生物浆在番茄和生菜中的生物刺激素作用。根据毒性试验,最后对植物进行10%的稀释。在生菜中,Bfao和Blac在水分处理(1.16±0.60 g)下显著提高了地上生物量(分别为2.17±0.54和2.33±1.13 g),而根生物量仅在Bfao(1.60±0.44 g)下显著高于对照(0.66±0.34 g)。所有消化液均提高了叶绿素含量指数(CCI),而产量(Fv/Fm)和性能指数(Plabs)与水分处理无显著差异。在番茄中,Bfao只显著增加了地上生物量。所有消化菌均显著提高了CCI,而Fv/Fm仅显著高于Bfao和Blac,这与水分控制有关。PIabs无差异。在这两种植物中,商品肥料的所有参数值都显著高于商品肥料。综上所述,所有消化液都能促进植物生长,其中Bfao对番茄和生菜生物量的影响最大,其次是black和Biog,是一种更便宜、更安全、影响更小的作物种植传统产品替代品。消化物是有价值的副产物,具有不同的特性和对植物生物量的影响,表明相互作用复杂。所有消化都刺激了番茄和生菜的生长。粮农组织设计的消化池对植物生物量的影响最大,是一种更便宜、更安全、影响更小的作物生长战略的适当替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hazard indicators in urban trees. Case studies on Platanus x hispanica Mill. ex Münchh and Morus alba L. in Mendoza city-Argentina Volunteer soybean (Glycine max) interference in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) crops: ethoxysulfuron and halosulfuron critical level of damage and selectivity Effect of yeast and mycorrhizae inoculation on tomato production under normal and water stress conditions Apple (Malus domestica) and pear (Pyrus communis) yield prediction after tree image analysis Efficacy of zinc lactate and Lactobacillus bulgaricus on nutrition and health of broiler chickens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1