Faster Than Projected Healing in Chronic Venous and Diabetic Foot Ulcers When Treated with Intact Fish Skin Grafts Compared to Expected Healing Times for Standard of Care: An Outcome-Based Model from a Swiss Hospital.

Thomas Zehnder, Marlise Blatti
{"title":"Faster Than Projected Healing in Chronic Venous and Diabetic Foot Ulcers When Treated with Intact Fish Skin Grafts Compared to Expected Healing Times for Standard of Care: An Outcome-Based Model from a Swiss Hospital.","authors":"Thomas Zehnder, Marlise Blatti","doi":"10.1177/15347346221096205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Inadequate response to wound management is defined as a reduction in the wound area of <40-50% following four weeks of standard of care (SOC) and should be managed with a skin substitute product. We set out to evaluate a novel outcome-based model focusing on the management of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) using SOC treatment or intact fish skin grafts (FSGs) in a regional hospital. <b>Methods:</b> We built an outcome-based model applying surrogate markers and endpoints of wound healing for VLU and DFU to determine the healing trajectory with SOC treatment. We could predict if VLU and DFU would heal by weeks 20 and 24, respectively, after four weeks of evaluating the initial wound area reduction. 51 patients were recruited (26 VLUs and 25 DFUs) and 42 wounds were randomized. 17 wounds deemed unlikely to heal by week 8 received management with FSG as per the Swiss Society for Dermatology and Venereology (SGDV) and the Swiss Association for Woundcare (SAfW) guidelines for the use of skin replacement products, and 26 wounds continued SOC for weeks 5-8. <b>Results/Discussion:</b> 12 wounds managed with FSG beat the modeled SOC healing predictions, with the majority healed >50% sooner and as early as <10% of the time than was predicted. Of these 17, five wounds failed to achieve the required size reduction in Week 4-8 (over 25% improvement in wound area vs. SOC). The FSG were assigned to treatment-resistant VLU and DFUs and were still able to heal these wounds most of the time and even changed the wound's healing trajectory that increased in size in the initial four weeks. <b>Conclusion:</b> This pilot study showed that management with FSG results in faster healing wounds than SOC predicted, while SOC-treated wounds mostly followed model predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":87022,"journal":{"name":"The Australian journal of optometry","volume":"66 1","pages":"15347346221096205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian journal of optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346221096205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Inadequate response to wound management is defined as a reduction in the wound area of <40-50% following four weeks of standard of care (SOC) and should be managed with a skin substitute product. We set out to evaluate a novel outcome-based model focusing on the management of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) using SOC treatment or intact fish skin grafts (FSGs) in a regional hospital. Methods: We built an outcome-based model applying surrogate markers and endpoints of wound healing for VLU and DFU to determine the healing trajectory with SOC treatment. We could predict if VLU and DFU would heal by weeks 20 and 24, respectively, after four weeks of evaluating the initial wound area reduction. 51 patients were recruited (26 VLUs and 25 DFUs) and 42 wounds were randomized. 17 wounds deemed unlikely to heal by week 8 received management with FSG as per the Swiss Society for Dermatology and Venereology (SGDV) and the Swiss Association for Woundcare (SAfW) guidelines for the use of skin replacement products, and 26 wounds continued SOC for weeks 5-8. Results/Discussion: 12 wounds managed with FSG beat the modeled SOC healing predictions, with the majority healed >50% sooner and as early as <10% of the time than was predicted. Of these 17, five wounds failed to achieve the required size reduction in Week 4-8 (over 25% improvement in wound area vs. SOC). The FSG were assigned to treatment-resistant VLU and DFUs and were still able to heal these wounds most of the time and even changed the wound's healing trajectory that increased in size in the initial four weeks. Conclusion: This pilot study showed that management with FSG results in faster healing wounds than SOC predicted, while SOC-treated wounds mostly followed model predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与标准护理的预期愈合时间相比,使用完整鱼皮移植治疗慢性静脉和糖尿病足溃疡的愈合速度快于预期:瑞士一家医院的成果模型。
目的:对伤口处理反应不充分的定义是伤口面积缩小:我们建立了一个基于结果的模型,应用VLU和DFU伤口愈合的替代标记和终点来确定SOC治疗的愈合轨迹。在评估初始伤口面积缩小四周后,我们可以预测 VLU 和 DFU 是否会分别在第 20 周和第 24 周愈合。我们招募了 51 名患者(26 名 VLU 和 25 名 DFU),并对 42 个伤口进行了随机分组。根据瑞士皮肤病与性病学会(SGDV)和瑞士伤口护理协会(SAfW)的皮肤替代产品使用指南,17 处被认为在第 8 周前不可能愈合的伤口接受了 FSG 治疗,26 处伤口在第 5-8 周继续接受 SOC 治疗。结果/讨论:12 例使用 FSG 治疗的伤口超过了 SOC 愈合预测模型,其中大多数伤口愈合时间提前了 50%以上,最早的伤口愈合时间达到了结论时间:这项试点研究表明,使用 FSG 处理伤口的愈合速度比 SOC 预测的要快,而 SOC 处理的伤口大多遵循模型预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Faster Than Projected Healing in Chronic Venous and Diabetic Foot Ulcers When Treated with Intact Fish Skin Grafts Compared to Expected Healing Times for Standard of Care: An Outcome-Based Model from a Swiss Hospital. Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutics for SBMA/Kennedy's Disease. Ophthalmic Lenses: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE AND MODERN TRENDS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1