Determination of energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions in peach production

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.25165/j.ijabe.20231602.7917
Cihan Demir, Osman Gökdoğan
{"title":"Determination of energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions in peach production","authors":"Cihan Demir, Osman Gökdoğan","doi":"10.25165/j.ijabe.20231602.7917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The purpose of this study was to determine the energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in peach production that took place in Kırklareli province of Turkey during the 2020-2021 production season. This study included calculations of energy input, energy output, energy use efficiency, specific energy, energy productivity, net energy, energy input types, GHG emissions and GHG ratio. Survey, observation and data calculations are related to the 2020-2021 production season. The data obtained from the study were collected from 16 different farms (reachable) through face-to-face surveys with full count method. Energy input and energy output were calculated as 19 570.58 MJ/hm 2 and 19 471.94 MJ/hm 2 , respectively. With regards to production inputs, 55.70% of the energy inputs consisted of chemical fertilizers energy (10 900.03 MJ/hm 2 ), 9.46% consisted of chemicals energy (1852.10 MJ/hm 2 ), 9.32% consisted of human labour energy (1823.13 MJ/hm 2 ), 7.65% consisted of electricity energy (1497.28 MJ/hm 2 ), 6.91% consisted of diesel fuel energy (1351.52 MJ/hm 2 ), 4.73% consisted of irrigation water energy (926.10 MJ/hm 2 ), 3.43% consisted of machinery energy (671.98 MJ/hm 2 ), 1.88% consisted of transportation energy (367.72 MJ/hm 2 ), 0.88% consisted of farmyard manure energy (171.80 MJ/hm 2 ) and 0.05% consisted of lime energy (8.94 MJ/hm 2 ). Energy use efficiency, specific energy, energy productivity and net energy were calculated as 0.99, 1.91 MJ/kg, 0.52 kg/MJ and –98.64 MJ/hm 2 , respectively. The consumed total energy input in production was classified as 28.60% direct energy, 71.40% indirect energy, 14.93% renewable energy and 85.07% non-renewable. Total GHG emissions and GHG ratio were calculated as 1683.24 kgCO 2-eq /hm 2 and 0.16 kg CO 2-eq /kg, respectively.","PeriodicalId":13895,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20231602.7917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The purpose of this study was to determine the energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in peach production that took place in Kırklareli province of Turkey during the 2020-2021 production season. This study included calculations of energy input, energy output, energy use efficiency, specific energy, energy productivity, net energy, energy input types, GHG emissions and GHG ratio. Survey, observation and data calculations are related to the 2020-2021 production season. The data obtained from the study were collected from 16 different farms (reachable) through face-to-face surveys with full count method. Energy input and energy output were calculated as 19 570.58 MJ/hm 2 and 19 471.94 MJ/hm 2 , respectively. With regards to production inputs, 55.70% of the energy inputs consisted of chemical fertilizers energy (10 900.03 MJ/hm 2 ), 9.46% consisted of chemicals energy (1852.10 MJ/hm 2 ), 9.32% consisted of human labour energy (1823.13 MJ/hm 2 ), 7.65% consisted of electricity energy (1497.28 MJ/hm 2 ), 6.91% consisted of diesel fuel energy (1351.52 MJ/hm 2 ), 4.73% consisted of irrigation water energy (926.10 MJ/hm 2 ), 3.43% consisted of machinery energy (671.98 MJ/hm 2 ), 1.88% consisted of transportation energy (367.72 MJ/hm 2 ), 0.88% consisted of farmyard manure energy (171.80 MJ/hm 2 ) and 0.05% consisted of lime energy (8.94 MJ/hm 2 ). Energy use efficiency, specific energy, energy productivity and net energy were calculated as 0.99, 1.91 MJ/kg, 0.52 kg/MJ and –98.64 MJ/hm 2 , respectively. The consumed total energy input in production was classified as 28.60% direct energy, 71.40% indirect energy, 14.93% renewable energy and 85.07% non-renewable. Total GHG emissions and GHG ratio were calculated as 1683.24 kgCO 2-eq /hm 2 and 0.16 kg CO 2-eq /kg, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桃生产中能源利用效率和温室气体排放的测定
本研究的目的是确定2020-2021年生产季节土耳其Kırklareli省桃子生产的能源利用效率和温室气体(GHG)排放。本研究包括能源投入、能源产出、能源利用效率、比能、能源生产率、净能、能源投入类型、温室气体排放和温室气体比率的计算。调查、观察和数据计算与2020-2021年的生产季节有关。通过面对面调查,采用全计数法,从16个不同的农场(可达)收集数据。能量输入和能量输出分别为19 570.58 MJ/hm 2和19 471.94 MJ/hm 2。在生产投入中,55.70%为化肥能(10 900.03 MJ/hm 2), 9.46%为化学能(1852.10 MJ/hm 2), 9.32%为人力能(1823.13 MJ/hm 2), 7.65%为电能(1497.28 MJ/hm 2), 6.91%为柴油能(1351.52 MJ/hm 2), 4.73%为灌溉水能(926.10 MJ/hm 2), 3.43%为机械能(671.98 MJ/hm 2)。其中运输能(367.72 MJ/hm 2)占1.88%,农家肥能(171.80 MJ/hm 2)占0.88%,石灰能(8.94 MJ/hm 2)占0.05%。能量利用效率、比能、能量生产力和净能分别为0.99、1.91 kg、0.52 kg/MJ和-98.64 MJ/hm 2。生产中消耗的总能源投入中直接能源占28.60%,间接能源占71.40%,可再生能源占14.93%,不可再生能源占85.07%。总温室气体排放量和温室气体比值分别为1683.24 kgCO 2-eq /hm 2和0.16 kgCO 2-eq /kg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (IJABE, https://www.ijabe.org) is a peer reviewed open access international journal. IJABE, started in 2008, is a joint publication co-sponsored by US-based Association of Agricultural, Biological and Food Engineers (AOCABFE) and China-based Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (CSAE). The ISSN 1934-6344 and eISSN 1934-6352 numbers for both print and online IJABE have been registered in US. Now, Int. J. Agric. & Biol. Eng (IJABE) is published in both online and print version by Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering.
期刊最新文献
Effects of spray adjuvants and operation modes on droplet deposition and elm aphid control using an unmanned aerial vehicle Comprehensive evaluation of the optimal rates of irrigation and potassium application for strawberry Design and test of the bilateral throwing soil-covering device for straw mulching machine in orchards Detection of the foreign object positions in agricultural soils using Mask-RCNN Separation and mechanical properties of residual film and soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1