{"title":"Avicenna’s Theodicy and al-Rāzī’s Anti-Theodicy","authors":"A. Shihadeh","doi":"10.1163/2212943X-00701004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Avicenna’s Neoplatonic account of divine providence and theodicy was hugely influential on later philosophical and religious thought in the Islamic world. However, it was severely criticised by one of his earlier commentators, the theologian-philosopher Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1210). While Avicenna champions an optimist theodicean thesis of a plenitude of good to support the theory of providence integrated into his cosmogony, his commentator counters by arguing for a plenitude of evil and an overall pessimist anti-theodicy. Rejecting Avicenna’s ontological-cum-cosmological account of evil, al-Rāzī argues that a theodicy must be strictly subject-centred and is ultimately a futile exercise. This article includes a study and translation of the relevant section in his commentary on Avicenna’s al-Išārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt (Pointers and Reminders).","PeriodicalId":92649,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual history of the Islamicate world","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual history of the Islamicate world","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2212943X-00701004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Avicenna’s Neoplatonic account of divine providence and theodicy was hugely influential on later philosophical and religious thought in the Islamic world. However, it was severely criticised by one of his earlier commentators, the theologian-philosopher Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 606/1210). While Avicenna champions an optimist theodicean thesis of a plenitude of good to support the theory of providence integrated into his cosmogony, his commentator counters by arguing for a plenitude of evil and an overall pessimist anti-theodicy. Rejecting Avicenna’s ontological-cum-cosmological account of evil, al-Rāzī argues that a theodicy must be strictly subject-centred and is ultimately a futile exercise. This article includes a study and translation of the relevant section in his commentary on Avicenna’s al-Išārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt (Pointers and Reminders).
阿维森纳对神的天意和神正论的新柏拉图主义描述对后来伊斯兰世界的哲学和宗教思想产生了巨大的影响。然而,他早期的一位评论员,神学家兼哲学家Faḫr al- d n al-Rāzī(公元606/1210年)严厉批评了这一观点。当阿维森纳拥护一个乐观主义的泰奥狄西的充足善的论点来支持将天意理论整合到他的宇宙论中去的时候,他的评论员反驳说,他主张充足的恶和一个全面的悲观主义的反神正论。al-Rāzī反对阿维森纳对邪恶的本体论和宇宙论的解释,认为神正论必须严格以主体为中心,最终是徒劳的。本文包括他对阿维森纳al-Išārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt(指针和提醒)的评论中的相关部分的研究和翻译。