{"title":"The affordance effect: Gatekeeping and (non)reciprocal journalism on Twitter","authors":"J. Groshek, Edson C. Tandoc","doi":"10.1145/2930971.2930993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines contemporary gatekeeping as it intersects with the evolving technological affordances of social media platforms and the ongoing negotiation of professionalized journalistic norms and routines in contentious politics. Beginning with a corpus of just over 4.2 million Tweets about the racially charged Ferguson, Missouri protests, a series of network analyses were applied to track shifts over time and to identify influential actors in this communicative space. These models informed further analyses that indicated legacy news organizations and affiliated journalists were least present and only marginally engaged in covering these events, and that other users on Twitter emerged as far more prominent gatekeepers. Methodological considerations and implications about the importance of dialogic and reciprocal activities for journalism are discussed in building on previous theorizing.","PeriodicalId":93402,"journal":{"name":"8th International Conference on Social Media & Society : Social Media for Good or Evil : Toronto, Canada, July 28-30, 2017. International Conference on Social Media & Society (8th : 2017 : Toronto, Ont.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"8th International Conference on Social Media & Society : Social Media for Good or Evil : Toronto, Canada, July 28-30, 2017. International Conference on Social Media & Society (8th : 2017 : Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930971.2930993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

This study examines contemporary gatekeeping as it intersects with the evolving technological affordances of social media platforms and the ongoing negotiation of professionalized journalistic norms and routines in contentious politics. Beginning with a corpus of just over 4.2 million Tweets about the racially charged Ferguson, Missouri protests, a series of network analyses were applied to track shifts over time and to identify influential actors in this communicative space. These models informed further analyses that indicated legacy news organizations and affiliated journalists were least present and only marginally engaged in covering these events, and that other users on Twitter emerged as far more prominent gatekeepers. Methodological considerations and implications about the importance of dialogic and reciprocal activities for journalism are discussed in building on previous theorizing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供效应:Twitter上的把关和(非)互惠新闻
本研究考察了当代守门人,因为它与社交媒体平台不断发展的技术支持以及在有争议的政治中正在进行的专业新闻规范和惯例的谈判相交叉。从420多万条关于密苏里州弗格森种族主义抗议活动的推特语料库开始,应用一系列网络分析来跟踪随着时间的变化,并确定这个交流空间中有影响力的参与者。这些模型为进一步的分析提供了依据,这些分析表明,传统新闻机构和附属记者在报道这些事件时参与度最低,而且只是勉强参与,而Twitter上的其他用户则成为了更重要的看门人。在先前理论的基础上,讨论了对话和互惠活动对新闻的重要性的方法考虑和含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
It's the aggression, stupid!: An examination of commenters' motives for using incivility in online political discussions The Cognitive Benefits of Social Media Use in Later Life: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. The affordance effect: Gatekeeping and (non)reciprocal journalism on Twitter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1