Copula Omission in Down Syndrome

IF 1.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Learning and Development Pub Date : 2022-06-17 DOI:10.1080/15475441.2022.2047687
C. Christodoulou, K. Wexler
{"title":"Copula Omission in Down Syndrome","authors":"C. Christodoulou, K. Wexler","doi":"10.1080/15475441.2022.2047687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of copula omission in Cypriot Greek individuals with Down Syndrome (DS). Previous studies on DS have attributed high rates of copula omission to an overall grammatical/inflectional impairment without offering further analysis. In order to identify relevant conditioning factors, we examined copula productions and omissions from spontaneous and elicited experimental tasks under five levels of analysis: categorial type of the predicate (nominal vs. adjectival), aspectual interpretation of the predicate (permanent vs. temporary), and a combination of these first two, as well as subject status (overt vs. covert) and experimental design (spontaneous vs. elicited). Results showed that adults with DS had significantly higher rates of copula omission than TD children. We found subject overtness to be the most reliable predictor of copula omission. A comparison of the two experimental methods of data collection also revealed a significant effect. Following an analysis based on the Unique Checking Constraint, we propose that copula omission is facilitated by the restriction that only one EPP feature (either the one in TP or the one in TopicP) can be checked. We discuss the implications of these results in the context of a distinction across a delayed vs. deviant development of the DS grammar.","PeriodicalId":46642,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning and Development","volume":"9 1","pages":"49 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2022.2047687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the nature of copula omission in Cypriot Greek individuals with Down Syndrome (DS). Previous studies on DS have attributed high rates of copula omission to an overall grammatical/inflectional impairment without offering further analysis. In order to identify relevant conditioning factors, we examined copula productions and omissions from spontaneous and elicited experimental tasks under five levels of analysis: categorial type of the predicate (nominal vs. adjectival), aspectual interpretation of the predicate (permanent vs. temporary), and a combination of these first two, as well as subject status (overt vs. covert) and experimental design (spontaneous vs. elicited). Results showed that adults with DS had significantly higher rates of copula omission than TD children. We found subject overtness to be the most reliable predictor of copula omission. A comparison of the two experimental methods of data collection also revealed a significant effect. Following an analysis based on the Unique Checking Constraint, we propose that copula omission is facilitated by the restriction that only one EPP feature (either the one in TP or the one in TopicP) can be checked. We discuss the implications of these results in the context of a distinction across a delayed vs. deviant development of the DS grammar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唐氏综合症的连字遗漏
本文探讨了塞浦路斯希腊人与唐氏综合症(DS)个体的copula遗漏的性质。先前的研究将连词省略率高归因于整体的语法/屈折变化缺陷,但没有提供进一步的分析。为了确定相关的条件因素,我们在五个分析层次下检查了自发和引出的实验任务中的联结词产生和省略:谓词的范畴类型(名义与形容词),谓词的方面解释(永久与临时),前两者的组合,以及主体状态(公开与隐蔽)和实验设计(自发与引出)。结果显示,成人退行性退行性破伤风的漏接率明显高于儿童退行性破伤风。我们发现受试者明显性是最可靠的联结遗漏预测因子。两种实验方法的数据收集比较也显示出显著的效果。在基于唯一检查约束的分析基础上,我们提出只有一个EPP特征(TP中的一个或TopicP中的一个)可以检查的限制促进了联结省略。我们在区分DS语法的延迟与异常发展的背景下讨论这些结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Acquisition of a rare variant: ne-realization in the negative utterances of French children and their caregivers Thematic Content, Not Number Matching, Drives Syntactic Bootstrapping An Online Survey of Picture Book Reading Practices with Children Between the Ages of 0 and 30 Months Semantic Cues Facilitate Structural Generalizations in Artificial Language Learning Associations Between Joint Attention, Supported Joint Engagement and Language in TD Children and Children with ASD: Potential Sources of Individual and Group Differences in Language Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1