Experiments in peripheral urbanization: Building and unbuilding commons in urban India

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning D-Society & Space Pub Date : 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1177/02637758221148733
P. Narayan
{"title":"Experiments in peripheral urbanization: Building and unbuilding commons in urban India","authors":"P. Narayan","doi":"10.1177/02637758221148733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peripheral urbanization is the predominant mode of producing space in the Global South, in which residents build their own homes and neighborhoods, becoming citizens and political agents in the process. In this article, I bring feminist ethnographic attention to community infrastructure such as childcare centers built collectively by women residents in MGR Nagar, an informal urban settlement in Chennai, India, as understudied examples of autoconstruction in peripheral urbanization. Marxist feminism enables a theorization of these infrastructures of social reproduction as urban commons that assert collective spatial autonomy and enable moral claims on urban space, while serving the everyday needs of its residents. The subsequent demolition of the childcare center caused symbolic and material loss to residents. However, the ceding of territorial autonomy and spatial privileges was a way for them to make new material and political gains in the city, suggesting that a feminist politics of space is possible in which legitimacy and responsibility are demanded from the state. The commons in turn can be seen as durable countertopographies enabling a politics of place in multiple locations.","PeriodicalId":48303,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","volume":"14 1","pages":"130 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758221148733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Peripheral urbanization is the predominant mode of producing space in the Global South, in which residents build their own homes and neighborhoods, becoming citizens and political agents in the process. In this article, I bring feminist ethnographic attention to community infrastructure such as childcare centers built collectively by women residents in MGR Nagar, an informal urban settlement in Chennai, India, as understudied examples of autoconstruction in peripheral urbanization. Marxist feminism enables a theorization of these infrastructures of social reproduction as urban commons that assert collective spatial autonomy and enable moral claims on urban space, while serving the everyday needs of its residents. The subsequent demolition of the childcare center caused symbolic and material loss to residents. However, the ceding of territorial autonomy and spatial privileges was a way for them to make new material and political gains in the city, suggesting that a feminist politics of space is possible in which legitimacy and responsibility are demanded from the state. The commons in turn can be seen as durable countertopographies enabling a politics of place in multiple locations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
周边城市化的实验:印度城市公地的建设与非建设
外围城市化是全球南方生产空间的主要模式,居民在其中建造自己的家园和社区,在此过程中成为公民和政治代理人。在这篇文章中,我将女权主义人种学的注意力放在了社区基础设施上,比如由印度金奈的一个非正式城市定居点MGR Nagar的女性居民集体建造的托儿中心,作为外围城市化中无人研究的自动建设例子。马克思主义女权主义使这些社会再生产的基础设施理论化,作为城市公地,主张集体空间自治,使城市空间的道德要求成为可能,同时满足其居民的日常需求。随后,托儿中心的拆除给居民带来了象征性和物质上的损失。然而,割让领土自治权和空间特权是她们在城市中获得新的物质和政治利益的一种方式,这表明一种女权主义的空间政治是可能的,在这种政治中,合法性和责任都是由国家要求的。公地反过来可以被看作是持久的反地形,在多个地点实现地方政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: EPD: Society and Space is an international, interdisciplinary scholarly and political project. Through both a peer reviewed journal and an editor reviewed companion website, we publish articles, essays, interviews, forums, and book reviews that examine social struggles over access to and control of space, place, territory, region, and resources. We seek contributions that investigate and challenge the ways that modes and systems of power, difference and oppression differentially shape lives, and how those modes and systems are resisted, subverted and reworked. We welcome work that is empirically engaged and furthers a range of critical epistemological approaches, that pushes conceptual boundaries and puts theory to work in innovative ways, and that consciously navigates the fraught politics of knowledge production within and beyond the academy.
期刊最新文献
Living and dying in the shadow of coal: Relocating social death and its contestations in Lephalale Re-forming resource entrepôts: Urban investment, extraction, and Beira’s Grande and Golden Peacock Hotels If ‘it all breaks down’: The Norwegian refugee crisis as a geography of chaos Livestreamed land: Scams and certainty in Myanmar’s digital land market Earthmoving for the extraterrestrial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1