苏东牧二校高中二年级学生使用汉语形容词 “严格” 与 “严厉” 的偏误分析 KESALAHAN PENGGUNAAN KATA SIFAT "YANGE" DAN "YANLI" PADA SISWA KELAS XI SMA SUTOMO 2 MEDAN

Dewi Kartika Tjong
{"title":"苏东牧二校高中二年级学生使用汉语形容词 “严格” 与 “严厉” 的偏误分析 KESALAHAN PENGGUNAAN KATA SIFAT \"YANGE\" DAN \"YANLI\" PADA SISWA KELAS XI SMA SUTOMO 2 MEDAN","authors":"Dewi Kartika Tjong","doi":"10.35529/jllte.v4i3.40-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explain the types and factors that cause errors in the use of the adjectives \"yange\" and \"yanli\" in class XI students of SMA Sutomo 2 Medan. Researchers used a qualitative descriptive research design with 30 students as research subjects. The data collection technique used was an elicitation technique to answer the first problem formulation regarding the types of errors and interview techniques to answer the second problem formulation, namely regarding the factors that cause errors. The results showed that there were 3 types of errors in the use of the adjectives \"yange\" and \"yanli\" in class XI students of SMA Sutomo 2 Medan, namely the addition of 2 sentences (4.88%); selection errors of 32 sentences (78.05%), and sequencing errors of 7 sentences (17.07%). The total errors in the use of the adjectives “yange” and “yanli” are 41 sentences. The types of errors that appear most often are election errors with a total of 32 sentences (78.05%); while the factors causing the error consisted of interlingual factors with a total of 11 students (45.83%) and intralingual factors with a total of 13 students (54.17%), which consisted of: overgeneralization of 2 students (8.34%) and the wrong concept hypothesis 11 students (45.83%). Key Word: Error; Adjective; “Yange”, “Yanli”","PeriodicalId":53061,"journal":{"name":"Language Literacy Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Literacy Journal of Linguistics Literature and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35529/jllte.v4i3.40-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explain the types and factors that cause errors in the use of the adjectives "yange" and "yanli" in class XI students of SMA Sutomo 2 Medan. Researchers used a qualitative descriptive research design with 30 students as research subjects. The data collection technique used was an elicitation technique to answer the first problem formulation regarding the types of errors and interview techniques to answer the second problem formulation, namely regarding the factors that cause errors. The results showed that there were 3 types of errors in the use of the adjectives "yange" and "yanli" in class XI students of SMA Sutomo 2 Medan, namely the addition of 2 sentences (4.88%); selection errors of 32 sentences (78.05%), and sequencing errors of 7 sentences (17.07%). The total errors in the use of the adjectives “yange” and “yanli” are 41 sentences. The types of errors that appear most often are election errors with a total of 32 sentences (78.05%); while the factors causing the error consisted of interlingual factors with a total of 11 students (45.83%) and intralingual factors with a total of 13 students (54.17%), which consisted of: overgeneralization of 2 students (8.34%) and the wrong concept hypothesis 11 students (45.83%). Key Word: Error; Adjective; “Yange”, “Yanli”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2 MEDAN
本研究旨在解释SMA Sutomo 2棉兰11班学生“雁”和“雁”形容词使用错误的类型和因素。研究人员采用定性描述性研究设计,以30名学生为研究对象。使用的数据收集技术是回答关于错误类型的第一个问题公式的启发技术和回答第二个问题公式的访谈技术,即关于导致错误的因素。结果表明,SMA Sutomo 2棉兰11班学生在形容词“羊”和“羊”的使用上存在3种错误,即加了2句(4.88%);32个句子的选择错误(78.05%),7个句子的顺序错误(17.07%)。形容词“燕阁”和“燕丽”的使用错误共计41句。出现最多的错误类型是选择错误,共32句(78.05%);而导致错误的因素为语际因素共11人(45.83%),语内因素共13人(54.17%),其中:过度概括2人(8.34%),错误概念假设11人(45.83%)。关键词:误差;形容词;“Yange”、“延利提供”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
WHAT AND HOW SHOULD THE PUBLIC SPEAKING BE? : A LITERATURE REVIEW CODE-SWITCHING AND CODE-MIXING IN ELT ANALYSIS OF SEMANTIC EXTENSIONS IN INDONESIAN CELEBGRAM’S INSTAGRAM COMMENTS HUBUNGAN INTENSITAS PENGGUNAAN SOFTWARE PLECO DENGAN PENGUASAAN KOSAKATA BAHASA MANDARIN PADA MAHASISWA SEMESTER VI STBA-PIA MEDAN 常用 PLECO 软件与汉语词汇掌握能力的相关性研究 —— 以亚院三年级学生为列 INVESTIGATING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING FEARS IN MAKING ENGLISH VIDEO PROJECT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1