Optimising real time clinical librarian support to enhance the evidence base in radiotherapy clinical protocols

IF 0.1 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal Pub Date : 2020-04-06 DOI:10.29173/lirg809
C. Regan, S. Goldsworthy, J. Pawley
{"title":"Optimising real time clinical librarian support to enhance the evidence base in radiotherapy clinical protocols","authors":"C. Regan, S. Goldsworthy, J. Pawley","doi":"10.29173/lirg809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical teams are professionally driven to adopt the latest evidence-based care ensuring optimal outcomes for patients. There can be delays in the latest evidence reaching practice. The radiotherapy multi-professional team in partnership with Clinical Librarians developed a lean process to undertake the real-time evidence-based live update of clinical radiotherapy protocols. Principles of Quality Function Deployment were deployed to create a lean process. The process was evaluated for the percentage difference to the radiotherapy protocol parameters over two years. Satisfaction of the live update was scored from 1: Very dissatisfied to 5: Very satisfied. Since 2014, 12 protocols have been through the process. The live update resulted in 80% of differences to the clinical protocol compared to the previous two years. Among 10 respondents, a mode of 5 was scored for satisfaction. This novel approach has been successful in providing a lean process ensuring that the latest evidence reaches radiotherapy practice.","PeriodicalId":41898,"journal":{"name":"Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libres-Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/lirg809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Clinical teams are professionally driven to adopt the latest evidence-based care ensuring optimal outcomes for patients. There can be delays in the latest evidence reaching practice. The radiotherapy multi-professional team in partnership with Clinical Librarians developed a lean process to undertake the real-time evidence-based live update of clinical radiotherapy protocols. Principles of Quality Function Deployment were deployed to create a lean process. The process was evaluated for the percentage difference to the radiotherapy protocol parameters over two years. Satisfaction of the live update was scored from 1: Very dissatisfied to 5: Very satisfied. Since 2014, 12 protocols have been through the process. The live update resulted in 80% of differences to the clinical protocol compared to the previous two years. Among 10 respondents, a mode of 5 was scored for satisfaction. This novel approach has been successful in providing a lean process ensuring that the latest evidence reaches radiotherapy practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化实时临床图书管理员支持,增强放射治疗临床方案的证据基础
临床团队以专业为导向,采用最新的循证护理,确保患者获得最佳结果。在获得最新证据的实践中可能会有延迟。放射治疗多专业团队与临床图书馆员合作开发了一个精益流程,以承担临床放射治疗方案的实时循证实时更新。部署了质量功能部署原则来创建一个精益过程。评估该过程在两年内与放射治疗方案参数的百分比差异。对实时更新的满意度评分从1分非常不满意到5分非常满意。自2014年以来,已经通过了12项协议。与前两年相比,实时更新导致80%的临床方案差异。在10名受访者中,满意度得分为5分。这种新颖的方法已经成功地提供了一个精益的过程,确保最新的证据到达放射治疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: LIBRES is an international refereed electronic journal devoted to new research in Library and Information Science. Libres is distributed through a listserver, and an ftp site. Listserver subscribers are notified of new issues through the distribution of a table of contents to LIBRES, LIBREF-L, and any other e-conferences requesting the service.
期刊最新文献
Peer-led literacy: a prison library’s collaboration with the Shannon Trust Beyond the search process: Exploring the affective stages in developing a research proposal A reach/significance cross-over: a strategy for demonstrating the impact of our research Blended professionals: the problem of legitimacy for UK librarians as teachers in Higher Education Scotland's public libraries are nothing but practical when it comes to deselection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1