From Quality-I to Quality-II: cultivating an error culture to support lean thinking and rework mitigation in infrastructure projects

IF 6.1 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Production Planning & Control Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI:10.1080/09537287.2021.1964882
P. Love, J. Matthews, Lavagnon A. Ika, P. Teo, Weili Fang, J. Morrison
{"title":"From Quality-I to Quality-II: cultivating an error culture to support lean thinking and rework mitigation in infrastructure projects","authors":"P. Love, J. Matthews, Lavagnon A. Ika, P. Teo, Weili Fang, J. Morrison","doi":"10.1080/09537287.2021.1964882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While lean thinking may help tackle waste, rework remains an ongoing problem during the construction of infrastructure projects. Often too much emphasis is placed on applying lean tools rather than harnessing the human factor and establishing a culture to mitigate rework. Thus, this paper proposes the need for construction organisations to transition from the prevailing error prevention culture (i.e. Quality-I) that pervades practice to one based on error management (i.e. Quality-II) if rework is to be contained and reduced. Accordingly, this paper asks: What type of error culture is required to manage errors that result in rework and to support lean thinking during the construction of infrastructure projects? We draw on the case of a program alliance of 129 water infrastructure projects and make sense of how it enacted, in addition to lean thinking, a change initiative to transition from error prevention to an error management culture to address its rework problem. We observed that leadership, psychological safety and coaching were pivotal for cultivating a culture where there was an acceptance that ‘errors happen’ and effort was directed at mitigating their adverse consequences. The contributions of this paper are twofold as we provide: (1) a new theoretical underpinning to mitigate rework and support the use of lean thinking during the construction of infrastructure projects grounded in Quality-II; and (2) practical suggestions, based on actual experiences, which can be readily employed to monitor and anticipate rework at the coalface of construction.","PeriodicalId":20627,"journal":{"name":"Production Planning & Control","volume":"63 3 1","pages":"812 - 829"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production Planning & Control","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1964882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract While lean thinking may help tackle waste, rework remains an ongoing problem during the construction of infrastructure projects. Often too much emphasis is placed on applying lean tools rather than harnessing the human factor and establishing a culture to mitigate rework. Thus, this paper proposes the need for construction organisations to transition from the prevailing error prevention culture (i.e. Quality-I) that pervades practice to one based on error management (i.e. Quality-II) if rework is to be contained and reduced. Accordingly, this paper asks: What type of error culture is required to manage errors that result in rework and to support lean thinking during the construction of infrastructure projects? We draw on the case of a program alliance of 129 water infrastructure projects and make sense of how it enacted, in addition to lean thinking, a change initiative to transition from error prevention to an error management culture to address its rework problem. We observed that leadership, psychological safety and coaching were pivotal for cultivating a culture where there was an acceptance that ‘errors happen’ and effort was directed at mitigating their adverse consequences. The contributions of this paper are twofold as we provide: (1) a new theoretical underpinning to mitigate rework and support the use of lean thinking during the construction of infrastructure projects grounded in Quality-II; and (2) practical suggestions, based on actual experiences, which can be readily employed to monitor and anticipate rework at the coalface of construction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从质量i到质量ii:在基础设施项目中培养错误文化以支持精益思维和减少返工
虽然精益思维有助于解决浪费问题,但在基础设施项目建设过程中,返工仍然是一个持续存在的问题。通常过于强调应用精益工具,而不是利用人的因素和建立一种文化来减少返工。因此,本文提出,如果要遏制和减少返工,建筑组织需要从普遍存在的错误预防文化(即质量- i)过渡到基于错误管理的文化(即质量- ii)。因此,本文提出:在基础设施项目的建设过程中,需要什么样的错误文化来管理导致返工的错误,并支持精益思维?我们以129个水利基础设施项目的项目联盟为例,了解它是如何在精益思维的基础上实施一项变革倡议,从错误预防过渡到错误管理文化,以解决其返工问题的。我们观察到,领导力、心理安全和指导对于培养一种文化至关重要,在这种文化中,人们接受“错误会发生”,并努力减轻其不利后果。本文的贡献是双重的,因为我们提供了:(1)一个新的理论基础,以减轻返工,并支持在基础设施项目建设中使用精益思维。(2)结合实际经验,提出切实可行的建议,便于对施工工作面返工进行监测和预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Production Planning & Control
Production Planning & Control 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Production Planning & Control is an international journal that focuses on research papers concerning operations management across industries. It emphasizes research originating from industrial needs that can provide guidance to managers and future researchers. Papers accepted by "Production Planning & Control" should address emerging industrial needs, clearly outlining the nature of the industrial problem. Any suitable research methods may be employed, and each paper should justify the method used. Case studies illustrating international significance are encouraged. Authors are encouraged to relate their work to existing knowledge in the field, particularly regarding its implications for management practice and future research agendas.
期刊最新文献
A framework for the systematic implementation of Green-Lean and sustainability in SMEs Exploring the barriers in medical additive manufacturing from an emerging economy Engaging with ‘Engineer for Supply Chain’ (EfSC): insights from two engineer-to-order manufacturers Towards a unified theory of supply chain value creation and capture Sustainable humanitarian supply chains: a systematic literature review and research propositions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1