Results of Annual Monitoring of Honey Bee Colony Winter Losses in Ukraine: Winter 2019–2020

M. Fedoriak, L. Tymochko, O. Shkrobanets, A. Zhuk, O. Deli, S. Podobivskiy, V. Mikolaychuk, O. Kalynychenko, U. Leheta, O. Zarochentseva
{"title":"Results of Annual Monitoring of Honey Bee Colony Winter Losses in Ukraine: Winter 2019–2020","authors":"M. Fedoriak, L. Tymochko, O. Shkrobanets, A. Zhuk, O. Deli, S. Podobivskiy, V. Mikolaychuk, O. Kalynychenko, U. Leheta, O. Zarochentseva","doi":"10.26565/1992-4259-2021-25-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To estimate honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758) colony winter loss rate for Ukraine after the winter 2019–2020 in the context of international COLOSS survey.\n\nMethods. Analysis of the results of the survey of Ukrainian beekeepers on A. mellifera colonies survival after the winter 2019-2020 by using the questionnaire developed by the coordinators of COLOSS international monitoring group. Unified approaches to data collection and statistical processing have been used. Valid protocols from 702 respondents from five physical-geographical zones of Ukraine have been analysed.\n\nResults. Honey bee colony winter loss rates for Ukraine after the winter 2019-2020 was 9.29%, the mortality rate was 5.41 %; the losses due to unsolvable queen problems – 2.19 %, and due to natural disasters – 1.69 %. The total losses in the steppe zone of Ukraine were 16.08%, significantly exceeding this indicator in the forest-steppe zone (8.94%), the zone of deciduous forests (6.73%) and the Ukrainian Carpathians (8.14%). The most common sign of dead colonies in Ukraine was the presence of a large number of dead bees in or in front of the hive (31.3 %) and unknown symptoms (37,3 %).\n\nThe majority of Ukrainian beekeepers (50.7%) did not notice any difference in wintering of the colonies going into winter with a new queen in comparison with the old one. Among antivarroa drugs, the majority of respondents preferred products based on amitraz (fumigation – 50.8%, in plates – 15.7%) and flumethrin (20.0%). We confirmed statistically lower level of winter losses in colonies treated with amitraz (fumigation), whereas colonies treated with formic acid (long-term) had higher losses.\n\nConclusions. Honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758) colony winter loss rate for Ukraine after the winter 2019–2020 was 9.29% and decreased slightly compared to the last year (11.18%) and the year before last (11.26%). It was almost twice lower than the average for the countries participating in COLOSS international monitoring (18,1%) (Gray, 2021).\n\nThe highest losses were observed in the steppe zone of Ukraine, whereas the lowest in the Ukrainian Carpathians. The smaller beekeeping operations with at most 50 colonies suffered significantly higher losses 12.66%) compared to medium and large ones (9.48% and 6.52%, respectively). The number of beekeepers treating colonies against varroosis was 90.6%, and all of them mentioned that they had pre-monitored the level of Varroa infestation.","PeriodicalId":40624,"journal":{"name":"Visnyk of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University-Series Geology Geography Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnyk of V N Karazin Kharkiv National University-Series Geology Geography Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/1992-4259-2021-25-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose. To estimate honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758) colony winter loss rate for Ukraine after the winter 2019–2020 in the context of international COLOSS survey. Methods. Analysis of the results of the survey of Ukrainian beekeepers on A. mellifera colonies survival after the winter 2019-2020 by using the questionnaire developed by the coordinators of COLOSS international monitoring group. Unified approaches to data collection and statistical processing have been used. Valid protocols from 702 respondents from five physical-geographical zones of Ukraine have been analysed. Results. Honey bee colony winter loss rates for Ukraine after the winter 2019-2020 was 9.29%, the mortality rate was 5.41 %; the losses due to unsolvable queen problems – 2.19 %, and due to natural disasters – 1.69 %. The total losses in the steppe zone of Ukraine were 16.08%, significantly exceeding this indicator in the forest-steppe zone (8.94%), the zone of deciduous forests (6.73%) and the Ukrainian Carpathians (8.14%). The most common sign of dead colonies in Ukraine was the presence of a large number of dead bees in or in front of the hive (31.3 %) and unknown symptoms (37,3 %). The majority of Ukrainian beekeepers (50.7%) did not notice any difference in wintering of the colonies going into winter with a new queen in comparison with the old one. Among antivarroa drugs, the majority of respondents preferred products based on amitraz (fumigation – 50.8%, in plates – 15.7%) and flumethrin (20.0%). We confirmed statistically lower level of winter losses in colonies treated with amitraz (fumigation), whereas colonies treated with formic acid (long-term) had higher losses. Conclusions. Honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758) colony winter loss rate for Ukraine after the winter 2019–2020 was 9.29% and decreased slightly compared to the last year (11.18%) and the year before last (11.26%). It was almost twice lower than the average for the countries participating in COLOSS international monitoring (18,1%) (Gray, 2021). The highest losses were observed in the steppe zone of Ukraine, whereas the lowest in the Ukrainian Carpathians. The smaller beekeeping operations with at most 50 colonies suffered significantly higher losses 12.66%) compared to medium and large ones (9.48% and 6.52%, respectively). The number of beekeepers treating colonies against varroosis was 90.6%, and all of them mentioned that they had pre-monitored the level of Varroa infestation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰蜂群冬季损失年度监测结果:2019-2020年冬季
目的。在国际COLOSS调查的背景下,估计乌克兰2019-2020年冬季后蜜蜂(Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758)群体冬季损失率。利用COLOSS国际监测小组协调员编制的调查问卷,对乌克兰养蜂人2019-2020年冬季后蜜蜂种群存活率的调查结果进行分析。采用了统一的数据收集和统计处理方法。对来自乌克兰五个自然地理区域的702名受访者的有效协议进行了分析。乌克兰2019-2020年冬季后蜂群冬季损失率为9.29%,死亡率为5.41%;无法解决的皇后问题造成的损失占2.19%,自然灾害造成的损失占1.69%。乌克兰草原带的总损失量为16.08%,显著超过森林-草原带(8.94%)、落叶林带(6.73%)和乌克兰喀尔巴阡山脉(8.14%)的总损失量。在乌克兰,死亡蜂群最常见的迹象是蜂箱内或门前有大量死蜂(31.3%)和未知症状(37.3%)。大多数乌克兰养蜂人(50.7%)没有注意到新蜂王与旧蜂王进入冬季的蜂群越冬有任何差异。在抗瓦螨药物中,大多数受访者更喜欢以阿米特嗪(50.8%,15.7%)和氟氯菊酯(20.0%)为基础的产品。我们从统计数据上证实,使用amitraz(熏蒸)处理的菌落冬季损失水平较低,而使用甲酸(长期)处理的菌落损失较高。乌克兰2019-2020年冬季后蜜蜂(Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758)群体冬季损失率为9.29%,较上年(11.18%)和前年(11.26%)略有下降。这几乎比参加科洛oss国际监测的国家的平均水平低两倍(18.1%)(Gray, 2021年)。乌克兰草原地区的损失最大,而乌克兰喀尔巴阡山脉的损失最低。最多50个蜂群的小规模养蜂场损失(12.66%)明显高于中型和大型养蜂场(9.48%和6.52%)。对蜂群进行防治的养蜂人占90.6%,所有养蜂人均表示对瓦螨的侵害程度进行了预监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Regarding the publication of a collective monograph under the project of the International Vysegrad Fund National participant geospatial information system in urban planning Assessment of the prospects of creating new forests in Ternopil region Biotic homogenization of dendroflora in the conditions of the megapolis (Dnipro, Ukraine) Entropy approach to assessment of the ecological state of a water course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1