The Disappearance of Form? Some Methodological Considerations on a Lost Conceptual Dimension in Biology

Q1 Arts and Humanities Perspectives on Science Pub Date : 2021-09-06 DOI:10.1162/posc_a_00389
M. Gutmann
{"title":"The Disappearance of Form? Some Methodological Considerations on a Lost Conceptual Dimension in Biology","authors":"M. Gutmann","doi":"10.1162/posc_a_00389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The concept of form belongs—apparently—to an older stage of biological concept formation. Paradoxically, it is even the insistence on the reference to form that shows its very disappearance. The more the functionalization, systematization, and finally algorithmization of modern biology advances, in the sense of systems biology, synthetic biology and bioinformatics, the less audible the call for a rehabilitation of the concept of form becomes. This technomorphic tendency, to deal with living entities in terms of artifacts, increasingly brought the concept of transformation into the forefront— articulated, e.g., in the formal sense by differential equations and their combination on all “levels” of the biological organization of living entities. It also coincidentally furthered the skepticism concerning the fundamental difference between artifacts and living entities. By explicitly denying or overlooking the conceptual necessity of this difference, the sensitivity for the peculiarity of living entities also dwindled, which in turn even in the","PeriodicalId":19867,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Science","volume":"28 1","pages":"666-680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The concept of form belongs—apparently—to an older stage of biological concept formation. Paradoxically, it is even the insistence on the reference to form that shows its very disappearance. The more the functionalization, systematization, and finally algorithmization of modern biology advances, in the sense of systems biology, synthetic biology and bioinformatics, the less audible the call for a rehabilitation of the concept of form becomes. This technomorphic tendency, to deal with living entities in terms of artifacts, increasingly brought the concept of transformation into the forefront— articulated, e.g., in the formal sense by differential equations and their combination on all “levels” of the biological organization of living entities. It also coincidentally furthered the skepticism concerning the fundamental difference between artifacts and living entities. By explicitly denying or overlooking the conceptual necessity of this difference, the sensitivity for the peculiarity of living entities also dwindled, which in turn even in the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形式的消失?关于生物学中丢失的概念维度的一些方法论思考
形式的概念显然属于生物学概念形成的一个较老的阶段。矛盾的是,它甚至是对形式的引用的坚持,显示了它的消失。在系统生物学、合成生物学和生物信息学的意义上,现代生物学的功能化、系统化和最终算法化进展得越快,要求恢复形式概念的呼声就越少。这种从人工制品的角度来处理生物实体的技术形态倾向,越来越多地将转化的概念带到了最前沿——例如,在形式意义上,通过微分方程及其在生物实体生物组织的所有“层面”上的组合来表达。巧合的是,这也进一步加深了人们对人工制品和生物之间根本区别的怀疑。通过明确否认或忽视这种差异的概念必要性,对生物实体特殊性的敏感性也减少了,这反过来甚至在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Science
Perspectives on Science Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Emancipation from Metaphysics? Natural History, Natural Philosophy and the Study of Nature from the Late Renaissance to the Enlightenment The Racialization of Killer Whales: An Application of Gene-Culture Coevolutionary Theory Preface: Virtual Entities in Science Conflicting results and statistical malleability: embracing pluralism of empirical results Between mind and body? Psychoneuroimmunology, psychology, and cognitive science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1