The Evolution of Nonprofit Management and Philanthropic Studies in the United States: Are We Now a Disciplinary Field?

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership Pub Date : 2019-01-16 DOI:10.18666/JNEL-2019-V9-I1-9598
Roseanne Mirabella, T. Hoffman, Terence K. Teo, M. McDonald
{"title":"The Evolution of Nonprofit Management and Philanthropic Studies in the United States: Are We Now a Disciplinary Field?","authors":"Roseanne Mirabella, T. Hoffman, Terence K. Teo, M. McDonald","doi":"10.18666/JNEL-2019-V9-I1-9598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article looks back at the recent history of delivering university education to future nonprofit leaders and the substantial growth of these programs by region and location during this period. It includes an analysis of the course offerings in the 340 programs providing curriculum in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies (NMPS) and how these offerings have changed (or have not changed) over time. Employing social network analysis, we examine NMPS curricular elements for top-ranked universities in the various accrediting networks to establish the extent to which the field has become a distinct discipline. We found convergence among NMPS course offerings by disciplinary orientation and homogeneity among curricular offerings for each disciplinary group. However, we found the field of NMPS education programs to be much more heterogeneous; that is, there is less similarity of course offerings across disciplinary boundaries than there is within disciplinary boundaries. The field of nonprofit management and philanthropic studies has yet to come into its own. Subscribe to JNEL","PeriodicalId":43170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/JNEL-2019-V9-I1-9598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This article looks back at the recent history of delivering university education to future nonprofit leaders and the substantial growth of these programs by region and location during this period. It includes an analysis of the course offerings in the 340 programs providing curriculum in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies (NMPS) and how these offerings have changed (or have not changed) over time. Employing social network analysis, we examine NMPS curricular elements for top-ranked universities in the various accrediting networks to establish the extent to which the field has become a distinct discipline. We found convergence among NMPS course offerings by disciplinary orientation and homogeneity among curricular offerings for each disciplinary group. However, we found the field of NMPS education programs to be much more heterogeneous; that is, there is less similarity of course offerings across disciplinary boundaries than there is within disciplinary boundaries. The field of nonprofit management and philanthropic studies has yet to come into its own. Subscribe to JNEL
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国非营利管理和慈善研究的演变:我们现在是一个学科领域吗?
这篇文章回顾了向未来的非营利组织领导者提供大学教育的近期历史,以及在此期间这些项目按地区和地点的大幅增长。它包括对340个提供非营利组织管理和慈善研究(NMPS)课程的课程设置的分析,以及这些课程如何随着时间的推移而变化(或没有变化)。通过社会网络分析,我们研究了在各种认证网络中排名靠前的大学的NMPS课程元素,以确定该领域已成为一门独特学科的程度。我们发现NMPS课程设置在学科方向上趋同,每个学科组的课程设置具有同质性。然而,我们发现NMPS教育项目的领域更加多样化;也就是说,跨学科界限的课程设置的相似性比学科界限内的要小。非营利组织管理和慈善研究领域尚未成熟。订阅JNEL
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership
Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Learning Modalities in MENAEvaluating the Non-Governmental Organizations Initiative Bridging Donor-Centric and Community-Centric Fundraising Approaches to Invest in Equitable Programs and Services Sending the Right Signals: A Theoretical Model to Understand How Interpretative Leadership Capacity Advances Cross-Sector Collaboration A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach to Identifying Facilitators and Barriers to Social Service Utilization for Food Pantry Clients in the South Bronx A Founder’s Story Taking a Social Program from Small Startup to Long-Term Sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1