State legal aid and undertrials: are there no takers?

Anup Surendranath, G. Andrew
{"title":"State legal aid and undertrials: are there no takers?","authors":"Anup Surendranath, G. Andrew","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2022.2029018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While the crisis in India’s legal aid system is well documented, the extent of utilization of legal aid lawyers for representation in court has received little attention. In this article, based on existing public data, we seek to demonstrate the extent of underutilization of legal aid services among prisoners nationally. The data reveals that over a period of 4 years, between 2016 and 2019, only 7.91% of the undertrials admitted into prisons utilized the legal aid services they were entitled to. This phenomenon of underutilization raises uncomfortable questions about the performance of India’s legal aid system, particularly in the context of socio-economic vulnerability of prisoners. However, the limitations of the data mean that it is not possible to determine the reasons for such underutilization – whether underutilization is being driven by lack of awareness of legal aid or by socio-economically vulnerable undertrial prisoners choosing other options despite being aware of free legal aid.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2029018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT While the crisis in India’s legal aid system is well documented, the extent of utilization of legal aid lawyers for representation in court has received little attention. In this article, based on existing public data, we seek to demonstrate the extent of underutilization of legal aid services among prisoners nationally. The data reveals that over a period of 4 years, between 2016 and 2019, only 7.91% of the undertrials admitted into prisons utilized the legal aid services they were entitled to. This phenomenon of underutilization raises uncomfortable questions about the performance of India’s legal aid system, particularly in the context of socio-economic vulnerability of prisoners. However, the limitations of the data mean that it is not possible to determine the reasons for such underutilization – whether underutilization is being driven by lack of awareness of legal aid or by socio-economically vulnerable undertrial prisoners choosing other options despite being aware of free legal aid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家法律援助和预审:无人接受吗?
虽然印度法律援助体系的危机有据可查,但利用法律援助律师在法庭上代表的程度却很少受到关注。在本文中,基于现有的公开数据,我们试图证明全国囚犯中法律援助服务利用不足的程度。数据显示,在2016年至2019年的4年间,只有7.91%的在押在押人员利用了他们有权获得的法律援助服务。这种利用不足的现象引发了对印度法律援助体系表现的令人不安的问题,特别是在囚犯的社会经济脆弱性背景下。然而,数据的局限性意味着无法确定这种利用不足的原因,即利用不足是由于缺乏对法律援助的认识,还是由于社会经济上脆弱的在审囚犯尽管知道免费法律援助,却选择了其他办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting without bannisters? The abstraction problem afflicting the basic structure doctrine Courts, mining conflicts, and Adivasi rights: a case study from central India (2000–2022) “ Mutated Sumangali Scheme ”: challenges in enforcement of labour laws in spinning mills of Tamil Nadu Protection of stakeholders’ interests in the Indian corporate landscape: examining the “ifs and buts” The maze of interpretation: abortion laws and legal indeterminacy in Indian courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1