„Klarere Spiegel des Göttlichen“ – Plutarch und die Tiere

Q4 Social Sciences Millennium DIPr Pub Date : 2019-10-21 DOI:10.1515/mill-2019-0006
Angela Pabst
{"title":"„Klarere Spiegel des Göttlichen“ – Plutarch und die Tiere","authors":"Angela Pabst","doi":"10.1515/mill-2019-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper deals with one of Plutarch’s favourite subjects - the relation between human beings and animals. In order to gain new insight into this topic, a three-step approach is chosen: First, the paper investigates some of the essential ideas concerning animals (their soul, their emotions and intellectual capacities) to be found in Plutarch’s work and the vocabulary he employs. Secondly, the paper focuses on Plutarch’s unique style of writing and his skillful use of the Socratic method to guide his audience. Thirdly, Plutarch’s personal opinion will be analyzed. In the first part of this paper, Plutarch’s work serves as a lens to unfold the nature of contemporary discourses on the relation between man and animal (with broad agreement on some points and controversies about others) as well as the different notions associated with the terms theria and zoa. A special focus is placed on the ‘Gryllos’ (mor. 985 d-992 e). Plutarch’s treatise ‘Whether the creatures of the land or the creatures of the sea have more phronesis’ (mor. 959 b-985 c) is an important contribution to the field of animal ethics and the subject of the second part of this paper. The ingenious structure of said text illustrates Plutarch’s qualities as a writer and how carefully he employs maieutic methods to support his readers in developing their own point of view. The third part of this paper is devoted to passages from Plutarch’s oeuvre which illustrate his personal position in the debate on the relation between human beings and animals. He is clearly aware that life on earth is inextricably interwoven with acts of killing and destruction, yet he also believes that observing animals has some lessons to offer to mystery religions. Plutarch describes animals as ‘clearer mirrors to the divine’, thereby illustrating that he perceives creatures - whether tiny or large - as a unique chance to gain a better understanding of the miracle of life. In this capacity animals provide a way for human beings to improve their insight into the nature of the divine.","PeriodicalId":36600,"journal":{"name":"Millennium DIPr","volume":"2 1","pages":"75 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium DIPr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mill-2019-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper deals with one of Plutarch’s favourite subjects - the relation between human beings and animals. In order to gain new insight into this topic, a three-step approach is chosen: First, the paper investigates some of the essential ideas concerning animals (their soul, their emotions and intellectual capacities) to be found in Plutarch’s work and the vocabulary he employs. Secondly, the paper focuses on Plutarch’s unique style of writing and his skillful use of the Socratic method to guide his audience. Thirdly, Plutarch’s personal opinion will be analyzed. In the first part of this paper, Plutarch’s work serves as a lens to unfold the nature of contemporary discourses on the relation between man and animal (with broad agreement on some points and controversies about others) as well as the different notions associated with the terms theria and zoa. A special focus is placed on the ‘Gryllos’ (mor. 985 d-992 e). Plutarch’s treatise ‘Whether the creatures of the land or the creatures of the sea have more phronesis’ (mor. 959 b-985 c) is an important contribution to the field of animal ethics and the subject of the second part of this paper. The ingenious structure of said text illustrates Plutarch’s qualities as a writer and how carefully he employs maieutic methods to support his readers in developing their own point of view. The third part of this paper is devoted to passages from Plutarch’s oeuvre which illustrate his personal position in the debate on the relation between human beings and animals. He is clearly aware that life on earth is inextricably interwoven with acts of killing and destruction, yet he also believes that observing animals has some lessons to offer to mystery religions. Plutarch describes animals as ‘clearer mirrors to the divine’, thereby illustrating that he perceives creatures - whether tiny or large - as a unique chance to gain a better understanding of the miracle of life. In this capacity animals provide a way for human beings to improve their insight into the nature of the divine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这些动物更有“上帝更明显的一面镜子
本文探讨普鲁塔克最喜欢的主题之一——人与动物的关系。为了对这个话题有新的认识,本文选择了三步走的方法:首先,本文调查了普鲁塔克作品和他使用的词汇中有关动物的一些基本观点(它们的灵魂、情感和智力)。其次,本文着重分析了普鲁塔克独特的写作风格,以及他巧妙地运用苏格拉底的方法来引导读者。第三,分析普鲁塔克的个人观点。在本文的第一部分中,普鲁塔克的作品作为一个镜头,揭示了当代关于人与动物关系的话语的本质(在某些观点上广泛一致,而在其他观点上存在争议),以及与“theria”和“zoa”相关的不同概念。特别关注的是“Gryllos”(更多)。985 d-992 e)。普鲁塔克的论文《陆地生物还是海洋生物都有更多的phronesis》(more。959 b-985 c)是对动物伦理学领域的重要贡献,也是本文第二部分的主题。所述文本的巧妙结构说明了普鲁塔克作为作家的品质,以及他如何小心翼翼地使用美学方法来支持读者发展自己的观点。本文的第三部分是普鲁塔克作品中的段落,这些段落说明了他在关于人与动物关系的辩论中的个人立场。他清楚地意识到,地球上的生命与杀戮和破坏行为密不可分,但他也相信,观察动物对神秘宗教有一些启示。普鲁塔克将动物描述为“神的更清晰的镜子”,从而说明他认为生物——无论大小——都是获得更好地理解生命奇迹的独特机会。在这种能力下,动物为人类提供了一种方法来提高他们对神性的洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Millennium DIPr
Millennium DIPr Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Pollen, brooches, solidi and Restgermanen, or today’s Poland in the Migration Period Pollen, brooches, solidi and Restgermanen, or today’s Poland in the Migration Period Phaedrus und Martial: Zur Interaktion von Versfabel und Epigrammatik Prokop, ein glaubwürdiger Berichterstatter? Der Gotenkrieg im Ager Gallicus und im Picenum und seine Auswirkungen auf die Region Towards a History of Syriac Rhetoric in Late Antiquity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1