Religiosity and Chastity Among Single Young Adults and Married Adults

IF 2.2 1区 哲学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology of Religion and Spirituality Pub Date : 2017-08-01 DOI:10.1037/rel0000112
S. Hardy, Brian J. Willoughby
{"title":"Religiosity and Chastity Among Single Young Adults and Married Adults","authors":"S. Hardy, Brian J. Willoughby","doi":"10.1037/rel0000112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the present study was to present theological, philosophical, and psychological arguments for chastity as a virtue, and then test an empirical model linking religiosity to outcomes by way of values about chastity. Specifically, we tested a mediation model linking religiosity to outcomes via chastity values (beliefs about the importance of waiting until marriage to have sex and importance of sex within marriage as a bonding experience). This model was tested with a sample of single young adults (4,188) and a sample of married adults (2,531). Among single young adults, religiosity positively predicted abstinence beliefs, and abstinence beliefs negatively predicted unhappiness, risk taking, and risky sex. Among married adults, religiosity positively predicted both chastity values (i.e., importance of waiting until marriage to have sex and importance of sex within marriage as a bonding experience), while, in turn, both chastity values were positively linked to sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction, but only belief in marital sex as bonding was positively related to sexual satisfaction. Differences across religious affiliation were also discussed (comparing Catholics, Protestants, Latter-Day Saints, and those with no religious affiliation). We conclude that one way religious communities may promote chastity and positive psychosocial functioning is by teaching chastity values and providing structures to motivate and enable people to live consistently with them.","PeriodicalId":47450,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Religion and Spirituality","volume":"23 1","pages":"285–295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Religion and Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000112","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to present theological, philosophical, and psychological arguments for chastity as a virtue, and then test an empirical model linking religiosity to outcomes by way of values about chastity. Specifically, we tested a mediation model linking religiosity to outcomes via chastity values (beliefs about the importance of waiting until marriage to have sex and importance of sex within marriage as a bonding experience). This model was tested with a sample of single young adults (4,188) and a sample of married adults (2,531). Among single young adults, religiosity positively predicted abstinence beliefs, and abstinence beliefs negatively predicted unhappiness, risk taking, and risky sex. Among married adults, religiosity positively predicted both chastity values (i.e., importance of waiting until marriage to have sex and importance of sex within marriage as a bonding experience), while, in turn, both chastity values were positively linked to sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction, but only belief in marital sex as bonding was positively related to sexual satisfaction. Differences across religious affiliation were also discussed (comparing Catholics, Protestants, Latter-Day Saints, and those with no religious affiliation). We conclude that one way religious communities may promote chastity and positive psychosocial functioning is by teaching chastity values and providing structures to motivate and enable people to live consistently with them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单身青年和已婚成年人的宗教信仰与贞操
本研究的目的是提出贞操作为一种美德的神学、哲学和心理学论证,然后测试一个经验模型,通过贞操的价值观将宗教虔诚与结果联系起来。具体来说,我们测试了一个中介模型,通过贞操价值观(关于等到结婚再发生性行为的重要性的信念,以及婚姻中性作为一种结合体验的重要性)将宗教虔诚与结果联系起来。该模型以单身年轻人(4188人)和已婚成年人(2531人)为样本进行了测试。在单身年轻人中,宗教信仰积极预测禁欲信仰,而禁欲信仰消极预测不快乐、冒险和危险的性行为。在已婚成年人中,宗教虔诚度积极预测贞操价值观(即等到结婚再发生性行为的重要性和婚姻中性行为作为一种结合体验的重要性),而反过来,这两种贞操价值观都与性频率和性满意度呈正相关,但只有相信婚姻性行为是一种结合与性满意度呈正相关。宗教信仰之间的差异也被讨论(比较天主教徒、新教徒、后期圣徒和无宗教信仰的人)。我们的结论是,宗教团体促进贞洁和积极的社会心理功能的一种方式是通过教导贞洁价值观,并提供结构来激励和使人们始终如一地与他们生活在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Psychology of Religion and Spirituality ® publishes peer-reviewed, original articles related to the psychological aspects of religion and spirituality. The journal publishes articles employing experimental and correlational methods, qualitative analyses, and critical reviews of the literature. Papers evaluating clinically relevant issues surrounding training, professional development, and practice are also considered. Full length research reports, literature reviews, and brief reports are all published.
期刊最新文献
Meaning making enhances gratitude to God: The importance of spiritual appraisals. Resilience in the face of adversity: The role of impermanence in mitigating the effects of childhood emotional abuse and everyday stress on depressive symptoms. Supplemental Material for Meaning Making Enhances Gratitude to God: The Importance of Spiritual Appraisals Supplemental Material for The Experiences of Faith and Church Community Among Christian Adults With Mental Illness: A Qualitative Metasynthesis Supplemental Material for Religion and Well-Being: What Is the Magnitude and the Practical Significance of the Relationship?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1