New Regulation of Derivatives Markets in Canada – An Australian Perspective

P. Latimer
{"title":"New Regulation of Derivatives Markets in Canada – An Australian Perspective","authors":"P. Latimer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1601249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are important differences in the strong national one-stop regulation of derivatives markets in Australia compared to the new provincial regulation in Canada in the Derivatives Act 2008 (Quebec). Each jurisdiction has lessons for the other. This article builds on the common histories of Canadian and Australian financial services with an Australian analysis of the Quebec Act, Canadian provincial financial services regulation and Canada’s new ‘passport’ system for financial market regulation. The Quebec Act, designed to underpin the focusing of Canadian derivatives trading on the Montreal Exchange, is an important global precedent for modern derivatives regulation. It is in line with the IOSCO aims for financial market regulation, including licensing and clearing. It regulates OTC derivatives, with a carve-out for defined ‘accredited counterparties’, and it sets a different standard for the conduct of business by meeting the accepted standards of the derivatives industry. However, as financial markets continue to merge across national borders in the move towards globalisation, different jurisdictions like Australia and Canada continue to use different wording for the same concepts which does not facilitate the persuasive authority of local case law and regulatory releases.The future of the Quebec Act is uncertain, as it may be superseded if the Canadian federal government proceeds with its plan to establish a federal securities commission which would include regulation of exchange-traded derivatives. One model for the future is that participation by the Canadian provinces in a federal scheme may be on a voluntary basis, at least initially. Another model is a single federal regulator for all provinces other than Quebec, with a passport system between the new federal regulator and Quebec. Most provinces and territories are strong supporters of a federal regulatory body, while Quebec announced in July 2009 that it would challenge the constitutionality of the proposed federal legislation. Although this may impact on Quebec's derivatives market and regulation, the Quebec Act remains an important study in derivatives regulation.","PeriodicalId":10000,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Securities Regulation (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1601249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are important differences in the strong national one-stop regulation of derivatives markets in Australia compared to the new provincial regulation in Canada in the Derivatives Act 2008 (Quebec). Each jurisdiction has lessons for the other. This article builds on the common histories of Canadian and Australian financial services with an Australian analysis of the Quebec Act, Canadian provincial financial services regulation and Canada’s new ‘passport’ system for financial market regulation. The Quebec Act, designed to underpin the focusing of Canadian derivatives trading on the Montreal Exchange, is an important global precedent for modern derivatives regulation. It is in line with the IOSCO aims for financial market regulation, including licensing and clearing. It regulates OTC derivatives, with a carve-out for defined ‘accredited counterparties’, and it sets a different standard for the conduct of business by meeting the accepted standards of the derivatives industry. However, as financial markets continue to merge across national borders in the move towards globalisation, different jurisdictions like Australia and Canada continue to use different wording for the same concepts which does not facilitate the persuasive authority of local case law and regulatory releases.The future of the Quebec Act is uncertain, as it may be superseded if the Canadian federal government proceeds with its plan to establish a federal securities commission which would include regulation of exchange-traded derivatives. One model for the future is that participation by the Canadian provinces in a federal scheme may be on a voluntary basis, at least initially. Another model is a single federal regulator for all provinces other than Quebec, with a passport system between the new federal regulator and Quebec. Most provinces and territories are strong supporters of a federal regulatory body, while Quebec announced in July 2009 that it would challenge the constitutionality of the proposed federal legislation. Although this may impact on Quebec's derivatives market and regulation, the Quebec Act remains an important study in derivatives regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大衍生品市场的新规-澳大利亚视角
与加拿大2008年《衍生品法》(魁北克)中新的省级监管相比,澳大利亚对衍生品市场强有力的全国性一站式监管存在重要差异。每个司法管辖区都有彼此的经验教训。本文以加拿大和澳大利亚金融服务的共同历史为基础,对魁北克法案、加拿大省级金融服务监管和加拿大金融市场监管的新“护照”制度进行了澳大利亚分析。《魁北克法案》旨在巩固加拿大衍生品交易在蒙特利尔交易所的重点,是现代衍生品监管的重要全球先例。这符合IOSCO在金融市场监管方面的目标,包括许可和清算。它对场外衍生品进行监管,并对已定义的“认可交易对手”进行区分,它通过满足衍生品行业公认的标准,为业务行为设定了不同的标准。然而,随着金融市场在走向全球化的过程中不断跨越国界,澳大利亚和加拿大等不同的司法管辖区继续对相同的概念使用不同的措辞,这不利于当地判例法和监管发布的说服性权威。魁北克法案的未来是不确定的,因为如果加拿大联邦政府继续其建立联邦证券委员会的计划,它可能会被取代,该委员会将包括对交易所交易衍生品的监管。未来的一种模式是加拿大各省在自愿的基础上参与联邦计划,至少最初是这样。另一种模式是对除魁北克以外的所有省份实行单一的联邦监管机构,在新的联邦监管机构和魁北克之间实行护照制度。大多数省份和地区都强烈支持联邦监管机构,而魁北克省在2009年7月宣布,它将挑战拟议的联邦立法的合宪性。虽然这可能会对魁北克的衍生品市场和监管产生影响,但魁北克法案仍然是衍生品监管的重要研究对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misaligned Incentives in Markets: Envisioning Finance That Benefits All of Society Enforcement Against the Biggest Banks Perspectives on U.S. Financial Regulation Transatlantic Extraterritoriality and the Regulation of Derivatives: The Need for an Integrated Approach between Washington and Brussels, the Uncertainties of BREXIT and New Directions in the US Corporate Governance Oversight and Proxy Advisory Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1