Transmission Mechanisms of Executive Compensation to Cost of Equity Capital

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Global Business and Finance Review Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.17549/gbfr.2022.27.4.108
K. Sanoran
{"title":"Transmission Mechanisms of Executive Compensation to Cost of Equity Capital","authors":"K. Sanoran","doi":"10.17549/gbfr.2022.27.4.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The nature of each component of executive compensation varies, resulting in variances in executive incentives and investor pricing. To examine whether there is a differential relation between executive compensation components and cost of equity capital, this study decomposes the effects of executive compensation components on the cost of equity capital into wealth alignment, contribution, time horizon, and equity incentive effects. \nDesign/methodology/approach: The hypotheses on the impact of each transmission mechanism of executive compensation component are separately developed in this study. The regression analyses are based on a sample of 11,649 firm-year observations of the U.S. listed companies during 1998-2014. \nFindings: The findings support all hypotheses by showing a significant reduction in cost of equity capital for bonus plans, long-term performance plans, and shareholdings, but a significant increase in cost of equity capital for salary and stock option. \nResearch limitations/implications: The conclusions of this study are based on an examination of publicly listed companies in the United States; the hypotheses can be tested in other countries with various business environments and cultures. \nOriginality/value: This study is a first attempt to explain the transmission mechanisms of executive compensation components and cost of equity capital by presenting evidence in support of wealth alignment effect, contribution effect, time horizon effect, and equity incentive effect.","PeriodicalId":35226,"journal":{"name":"Global Business and Finance Review","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business and Finance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2022.27.4.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The nature of each component of executive compensation varies, resulting in variances in executive incentives and investor pricing. To examine whether there is a differential relation between executive compensation components and cost of equity capital, this study decomposes the effects of executive compensation components on the cost of equity capital into wealth alignment, contribution, time horizon, and equity incentive effects. Design/methodology/approach: The hypotheses on the impact of each transmission mechanism of executive compensation component are separately developed in this study. The regression analyses are based on a sample of 11,649 firm-year observations of the U.S. listed companies during 1998-2014. Findings: The findings support all hypotheses by showing a significant reduction in cost of equity capital for bonus plans, long-term performance plans, and shareholdings, but a significant increase in cost of equity capital for salary and stock option. Research limitations/implications: The conclusions of this study are based on an examination of publicly listed companies in the United States; the hypotheses can be tested in other countries with various business environments and cultures. Originality/value: This study is a first attempt to explain the transmission mechanisms of executive compensation components and cost of equity capital by presenting evidence in support of wealth alignment effect, contribution effect, time horizon effect, and equity incentive effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高管薪酬对股权资本成本的传导机制
目的:高管薪酬各组成部分的性质不同,导致高管激励和投资者定价的差异。为了检验高管薪酬组成部分与股权资本成本之间是否存在差异关系,本研究将高管薪酬组成部分对股权资本成本的影响分解为财富一致性、贡献、时间跨度和股权激励效应。设计/方法/途径:本研究分别对高管薪酬构成的各个传导机制的影响进行假设。回归分析基于1998-2014年间11,649家美国上市公司的年度观察样本。研究发现:研究结果支持所有假设,表明奖金计划、长期绩效计划和持股的股权资本成本显著降低,但工资和股票期权的股权资本成本显著增加。研究局限性/启示:本研究的结论是基于对美国上市公司的考察;这些假设可以在其他具有不同商业环境和文化的国家进行检验。原创性/价值:本研究首次通过财富趋同效应、贡献效应、时间跨度效应和股权激励效应的证据来解释高管薪酬构成与股权资本成本的传导机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Business and Finance Review
Global Business and Finance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Key Attributes of Upcycled Food using a Best-Worst Scaling Approach Impact of Accounting Conservatism on the Informativeness of Current Stock Prices for Future Earnings Mediation Effects of Financial Performance between Assets Utilization and the Market Value of Palestinian Listed Firms Structural Relationship between Taste, Price Fairness, and Repurchase Intention of Fast Food: Moderating Effect of Healthiness The Effects of Enterprise Risk Management on the Performance and Risk of Vietnamese Listed Firms: Evidence from Abnormal Enterprise Risk Management Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1