AFRICA AND THE ‘GLOBALIZATION BARGAIN’: TOWARDS A COLLECTIVE ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY

A. Okoli, A. G. Atelhe
{"title":"AFRICA AND THE ‘GLOBALIZATION BARGAIN’: TOWARDS A COLLECTIVE ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY","authors":"A. Okoli, A. G. Atelhe","doi":"10.22456/2238-6912.113344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Africa’s existential situation in the prevailing global order is such that no state thereof can afford to take national sovereignty too seriously. Apart from the myriad of structural challenges imposed on the continent by globalization, Africa is faced with a gamut of political and economic problems that can only be meaningfully addressed through some form of strategic multilateral collaboration. Africa’s aspiration to economic sovereignty has been constrained by the structural conditionalities of globalization, which have kept the continent overly weak, dependent and underdeveloped. The constraint is so immanent that individual African states can hardly afford even the relative sovereignty to harness a strategic balance in the fast ossifying asymmetries of interdependence that characterize the contemporary global political economy. It is posited in this paper that the remedy for Africa lies in the ability of her states to transcend their disempowering territorial-cum-nationalistic divides and capitalize on the existing continental multilateral mechanisms towards mainstreaming collective sovereignty, based on the principle of pan-African supranationalism. To that end, leveraging and maximizing the gains and prospects of extant regional and continental supranational organisms would become both salient and expedient.","PeriodicalId":37936,"journal":{"name":"Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-6912.113344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Africa’s existential situation in the prevailing global order is such that no state thereof can afford to take national sovereignty too seriously. Apart from the myriad of structural challenges imposed on the continent by globalization, Africa is faced with a gamut of political and economic problems that can only be meaningfully addressed through some form of strategic multilateral collaboration. Africa’s aspiration to economic sovereignty has been constrained by the structural conditionalities of globalization, which have kept the continent overly weak, dependent and underdeveloped. The constraint is so immanent that individual African states can hardly afford even the relative sovereignty to harness a strategic balance in the fast ossifying asymmetries of interdependence that characterize the contemporary global political economy. It is posited in this paper that the remedy for Africa lies in the ability of her states to transcend their disempowering territorial-cum-nationalistic divides and capitalize on the existing continental multilateral mechanisms towards mainstreaming collective sovereignty, based on the principle of pan-African supranationalism. To that end, leveraging and maximizing the gains and prospects of extant regional and continental supranational organisms would become both salient and expedient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲与“全球化交易”:走向集体经济主权
非洲在现行全球秩序中的生存状况是这样的,没有一个非洲国家能够把国家主权看得太严重。除了全球化给非洲大陆带来的无数结构性挑战之外,非洲还面临着一系列政治和经济问题,这些问题只有通过某种形式的战略性多边合作才能得到有意义地解决。非洲对经济主权的渴望受到全球化的结构性条件的限制,这些条件使非洲大陆过于脆弱、依赖和不发达。这种制约是如此根深蒂固,以至于单个非洲国家甚至连相对主权都负担不起,难以在以当代全球政治经济为特征的、迅速僵化的相互依赖的不对称中实现战略平衡。本文认为,非洲的解决之道在于非洲各国有能力超越其领土和民族主义的分裂,并利用现有的大陆多边机制,在泛非超国家主义原则的基础上,将集体主权纳入主流。为此目的,利用和最大限度地扩大现有的区域和大陆超国家组织的成果和前景将是既突出又有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations
Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: AUSTRAL: Brazilian Journal of Strategy and International Relations was the first Brazilian journal in the area of International Relations to be fully published in English (2012). It is an essentially academic vehicle, linked to the Brazilian Centre of Strategy & International Relations (NERINT) and the Doctoral Program in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI) of the Faculty of Economics (FCE) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Its pluralist focus aims to contribute to the debate on the international political and economic order from the perspective of the developing world. The journal publishes original articles in the area of Strategy and International Relations, with special interest in issues related to developing countries and South-South Cooperation – its security problems; the political, economic and diplomatic developments of emerging countries; and their relations with the traditional powers. AUSTRAL is published semi-annually in English and Portuguese. The journal’s target audience consists of researchers, experts, diplomats, military personnel and graduate students of International Relations. The content of the journal consists of in-depth analytical articles written by experts (Professors and Doctors), focusing on each of the great continents of the South: Asia, Latin America and Africa. Thus, the debate and diffusion of knowledge produced in these regions is stimulated. All contributions submitted to AUSTRAL are subject to rigorous scientific evaluation.
期刊最新文献
FROM THE KAZAKHSTAN CRISIS TO SEE HOW RUSSIA INVOLVED IN GLOBAL SECURITY GOVERNANCE AS CONSEQUÊNCIAS DOS ATENTADOS DE 11 DE SETEMBRO DE 2001 PARA A ECONOMIA BRASILEIRA A COR DO GATO GEOPOLÍTICA NORTE-AMERICANA E CHINESA EM PERSPECTIVA COMPARADA CENTRO, PERIFERIA OU SEMIPERIFERIA NAS CADEIAS GLOBAIS DE VALOR? AS POSIÇÕES DO BRASIL E DA CHINA NA ECONOMIA-MUNDO CONTEMPORÂNEA (2005-2015) A RESOLUÇÃO DO CONFLITO ISRAELO-LIBANÊS PELO CONSELHO DE SEGURANÇA DA ONU (2006)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1