Acute rise in Multiple Drug Resistance Typhoid fever in Children in Rural Sindh: an Alarming Situation

N. Kumari, C. Das, P. Goswami, K. Bai, F. Rajpar
{"title":"Acute rise in Multiple Drug Resistance Typhoid fever in Children in Rural Sindh: an Alarming Situation","authors":"N. Kumari, C. Das, P. Goswami, K. Bai, F. Rajpar","doi":"10.26692/surj/2019.12.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluation of the frequency of antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella typhiamong children of rural Sindh. \nStudy Design: Cross sectional / observational study Place and Duration: At Department of Pediatric medicine Civil Hospital Mirpurkhas, Sindh from January 2019 to July 2019 \nMethodology: With approval of ethical committee and informed consent from parents/attendant blood samples (5ml) of 55 children with age between 0 to 15 years are obtained at outpatient department (OPD) or admitted in the ward with suspected enteric fever. The blood samples were used to obtain bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivity was performed at diagnostic and research laboratory (DRC) of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS). Blood culture and Antibiotic Susceptibility testing was performed according to standard protocol of Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Results: Among study population (n=55), 32 (58.2% were in age group 0 to 5 years, 20(36.4%) in age group of 6 to 10 years while only 3(5.5%) were in the age group of 11 to 15 years.While regarding gender,29(52.7%) were male while 26(36.4%) were females. S. typhi exhibited high resistance against ampicillin (93% n=51) and cotrimazole-trimethoprim (91%n= 50). About 82% (n=46) of culture was observed resistant to ciprofloxacin, whereas 84% (n=46) showed resistance to ceftriaxone, 84% (n=46) were resistant to cefixime. Out of these 55, 45(82%) showed antimicrobial sensitivity to meropenem, 34 (62%) to azithromycin, 10(18%) to ciprofloxacin, 09 (16%) to cefixime and ceftriaxone each, while only 05 patients showed sensitivity to (9%) to cotrimazole-trimethoprim and 04(7%) to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Conclusion: Multiple drug resistance in S. typhiis high alert situation in our setup and needs prompt initiatives to combat.","PeriodicalId":21859,"journal":{"name":"Sindh University Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sindh University Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26692/surj/2019.12.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the frequency of antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella typhiamong children of rural Sindh. Study Design: Cross sectional / observational study Place and Duration: At Department of Pediatric medicine Civil Hospital Mirpurkhas, Sindh from January 2019 to July 2019 Methodology: With approval of ethical committee and informed consent from parents/attendant blood samples (5ml) of 55 children with age between 0 to 15 years are obtained at outpatient department (OPD) or admitted in the ward with suspected enteric fever. The blood samples were used to obtain bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivity was performed at diagnostic and research laboratory (DRC) of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS). Blood culture and Antibiotic Susceptibility testing was performed according to standard protocol of Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Results: Among study population (n=55), 32 (58.2% were in age group 0 to 5 years, 20(36.4%) in age group of 6 to 10 years while only 3(5.5%) were in the age group of 11 to 15 years.While regarding gender,29(52.7%) were male while 26(36.4%) were females. S. typhi exhibited high resistance against ampicillin (93% n=51) and cotrimazole-trimethoprim (91%n= 50). About 82% (n=46) of culture was observed resistant to ciprofloxacin, whereas 84% (n=46) showed resistance to ceftriaxone, 84% (n=46) were resistant to cefixime. Out of these 55, 45(82%) showed antimicrobial sensitivity to meropenem, 34 (62%) to azithromycin, 10(18%) to ciprofloxacin, 09 (16%) to cefixime and ceftriaxone each, while only 05 patients showed sensitivity to (9%) to cotrimazole-trimethoprim and 04(7%) to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Conclusion: Multiple drug resistance in S. typhiis high alert situation in our setup and needs prompt initiatives to combat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信德省农村儿童多重耐药伤寒急性上升:令人担忧的情况
目的:了解信德省农村儿童伤寒沙门菌耐药情况。研究设计:横切/观察性研究地点和时间:2019年1月至2019年7月在信德省米尔普卡斯民用医院儿科医学部。方法:经伦理委员会批准并获得家长/陪同人员的知情同意,在门诊(OPD)或疑似肠道发热的病房获得55名年龄在0至15岁之间的儿童的血液样本(5ml)。血液样本用于细菌培养,并在Liaquat医学与健康科学大学(LUMHS)诊断和研究实验室(DRC)进行抗生素敏感性检测。按照临床实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南的标准方案进行血培养和抗生素药敏试验。结果:55例研究人群中,0 ~ 5岁32例(58.2%),6 ~ 10岁20例(36.4%),11 ~ 15岁3例(5.5%)。性别方面,男性29人(52.7%),女性26人(36.4%)。伤寒沙门氏菌对氨苄西林(93% n=51)和复方曲霉唑-甲氧苄啶(91%n= 50)表现出较高的耐药性。82% (n=46)的培养物对环丙沙星耐药,84% (n=46)的培养物对头孢曲松耐药,84% (n=46)的培养物对头孢克肟耐药。55例患者中,45例(82%)对美罗培南敏感,34例(62%)对阿奇霉素敏感,10例(18%)对环丙沙星敏感,09例(16%)对头孢克肟和头孢曲松敏感,05例(9%)对复方霉唑-甲氧苄啶敏感,04例(7%)对阿莫西林/克拉维酸敏感。结论:我国伤寒沙门氏菌多重耐药形势高度警戒,需要及时采取措施进行防治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, awareness and perception towards COVID-19 during early outbreak: a cross-sectional study from southern Pakistan Analysis of Facebook contents of Police Department of Pakistan in the context of Good Governance Perception of Quality about Local Manufacturing of Drugs in Pakistan and Its Qualitative Analysis Frequency of overweight and obesity among Middle School Children A case study of District Hyderabad Pakistan Mineralogical Studies of Manchar Formation (Pliocene), Laki Range, Pakistan: source and Possible Occurrence of Bauxite
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1