MONOTONY OF PARTS OF CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE: THE ABSENCE OF SMALL DETAILS AND SEPARATIONS

U. Dietrich
{"title":"MONOTONY OF PARTS OF CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURE: THE ABSENCE OF SMALL DETAILS AND SEPARATIONS","authors":"U. Dietrich","doi":"10.2495/arc220151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contemporary architecture, a trend can be observed that buildings have a simple rectangular form and façades are composed of a few large elements, all together leading to a monotonous look. Following a proposed list of good design criteria, representative examples of a historical building (from 1900) and a contemporary one are analyzed and confronted. Based on that design criteria an endeavour to criticise certain trends in contemporary architecture can be implemented. To bring the question what makes a façade aesthetic to a more objective basis, the perception mechanism of the human eye is presented. Because of its spherical form, it delivers a sharp vision only in an exceedingly small angle range. Consequently, the eye moves quickly over the object in view producing several sharp spots that are finally completed to a sharp image by the brain. This process can run smoothly if there, where the next eye movement (saccade) strikes on the object, is a new, perceptible element located – the eye’s movement is guided, the object is perceived positively and aesthetically. As a precondition, a particularly high number of small-sized elements and few principles of order, what confirms a good part of the list of design criteria, are needed. Based on this, arguments why parts of contemporary architecture may be perceived as monotonous, partly out of human scale and not really aesthetic are formulated as well as conclusions what is missing. In order to involve (future) professionals, a master’s course for students of architecture at HafenCity University Hamburg is presented. Architectural ensembles were selected and drawings of the eye’s movement scanning the shown objects generated. The students’ analysis confirmed well a connection between a good guidance of the eye’s movement and a positive, aesthetical perception. Finally, reasons why there is contradiction between the awareness of good design and the practical outcome are sketched.","PeriodicalId":23773,"journal":{"name":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/arc220151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary architecture, a trend can be observed that buildings have a simple rectangular form and façades are composed of a few large elements, all together leading to a monotonous look. Following a proposed list of good design criteria, representative examples of a historical building (from 1900) and a contemporary one are analyzed and confronted. Based on that design criteria an endeavour to criticise certain trends in contemporary architecture can be implemented. To bring the question what makes a façade aesthetic to a more objective basis, the perception mechanism of the human eye is presented. Because of its spherical form, it delivers a sharp vision only in an exceedingly small angle range. Consequently, the eye moves quickly over the object in view producing several sharp spots that are finally completed to a sharp image by the brain. This process can run smoothly if there, where the next eye movement (saccade) strikes on the object, is a new, perceptible element located – the eye’s movement is guided, the object is perceived positively and aesthetically. As a precondition, a particularly high number of small-sized elements and few principles of order, what confirms a good part of the list of design criteria, are needed. Based on this, arguments why parts of contemporary architecture may be perceived as monotonous, partly out of human scale and not really aesthetic are formulated as well as conclusions what is missing. In order to involve (future) professionals, a master’s course for students of architecture at HafenCity University Hamburg is presented. Architectural ensembles were selected and drawings of the eye’s movement scanning the shown objects generated. The students’ analysis confirmed well a connection between a good guidance of the eye’s movement and a positive, aesthetical perception. Finally, reasons why there is contradiction between the awareness of good design and the practical outcome are sketched.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代建筑部分的单调:缺乏小细节和分离
在当代建筑中,可以观察到一种趋势,即建筑物具有简单的矩形形式,立面由几个大元素组成,所有这些元素一起导致单调的外观。根据提出的良好设计标准清单,对历史建筑(1900年)和当代建筑的代表性例子进行了分析和面对。基于这一设计标准,可以对当代建筑的某些趋势进行批评。为了使是什么构成了一种更客观的审美,提出了人眼的感知机制。由于它是球形的,所以只能在很小的角度范围内提供清晰的视野。因此,眼睛在视野中的物体上快速移动,产生几个尖锐的斑点,最终由大脑完成清晰的图像。如果下一个眼球运动(扫视)击中物体的地方有一个新的、可感知的元素,这个过程可以顺利进行——眼球的运动被引导,物体被积极地、美学地感知。作为先决条件,需要特别多的小型元素和少量的顺序原则,以确认设计标准列表中的大部分内容。在此基础上,讨论了为什么部分当代建筑可能被认为是单调的,部分超出了人类的尺度,而不是真正的美学,并得出了缺失的结论。为了让(未来的)专业人士参与进来,汉堡港城市大学为建筑专业的学生开设了一门硕士课程。选择建筑整体,并生成眼睛扫描所显示对象的运动图。学生们的分析很好地证实了眼睛运动的良好引导与积极的审美感知之间的联系。最后,简述了优秀设计意识与实践成果之间存在矛盾的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROMOTING SYSTEM SAFETY AND RELIABILITY THROUGH RISK QUANTIFICATION/VISUALISATION METHODOLOGY PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY IN THE PROXIMITY OF CONSTRUCTION SITES: AN APPROACH TO ANALYSE AND IMPROVE THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR ASSESSING THE RESILIENCE OF CROSS-BORDER CRITICAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE CAN WE ASSESS LANDSLIDE HAZARDS IN THE VOLCANIC CRATER OF LAKE ALBANO, ROME, ITALY? GEOSTATISTICAL MODELING OF SEISMIC ACTIONS ON THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THE SAN BENEDETTO ROAD TUNNEL, ITALY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1