Non Vitamin k Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation Assessment in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography

Mohamed Ahmed Zaki, Hamouda Abdel Khalek El-Bahnasy
{"title":"Non Vitamin k Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation Assessment in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography","authors":"Mohamed Ahmed Zaki, Hamouda Abdel Khalek El-Bahnasy","doi":"10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background : Warfarin with optimized international normalization ratio (INR); is significantly affect the Micro embolic signals (MES), in many studies. Non vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recently approved for stroke prevention in non valvular AF. In contrast to Warfarin; effect of NOACs on MES is not yet fully researched. Aim : To determine the effect of NOACs on MES, in comparison to warfarin in non valvular AF, to reflect the potential embolization risk. Methods : The incidence and number of MES was studied in patients with non valvular AF. Two groups in the current study; the first, patients were put on warfarin with INR levels were optimized to (2-3), and considered as a control group. The second; patients were put on NOAC (rivaroxaban, 15 mg /day). Study patients were recruited from cardiology outpatient clinics and departments (Al-Azhar University hospitals; Cairo and New Damietta, Egypt). Patients of the both groups were subjected to MES detection and counting by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) monitoring. Results : MES did not detected in 22.5% in study groups; no statistically significant differences between study groups. The incidence and number of MES; within the warfarin group; MES were detected in (30 patients, 75%), while within the rivaroxaban group (32 patients, 80%). The average number of MES; in group one were (11.65 ±7.20), and in group two (11.50 ±7.20), with no significant statistical difference also. Conclusion : The effect of warfarin and NOAC use is not statistically different and Rivaroxaban is not inferior to warfarin.","PeriodicalId":93199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20230701.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Background : Warfarin with optimized international normalization ratio (INR); is significantly affect the Micro embolic signals (MES), in many studies. Non vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are recently approved for stroke prevention in non valvular AF. In contrast to Warfarin; effect of NOACs on MES is not yet fully researched. Aim : To determine the effect of NOACs on MES, in comparison to warfarin in non valvular AF, to reflect the potential embolization risk. Methods : The incidence and number of MES was studied in patients with non valvular AF. Two groups in the current study; the first, patients were put on warfarin with INR levels were optimized to (2-3), and considered as a control group. The second; patients were put on NOAC (rivaroxaban, 15 mg /day). Study patients were recruited from cardiology outpatient clinics and departments (Al-Azhar University hospitals; Cairo and New Damietta, Egypt). Patients of the both groups were subjected to MES detection and counting by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) monitoring. Results : MES did not detected in 22.5% in study groups; no statistically significant differences between study groups. The incidence and number of MES; within the warfarin group; MES were detected in (30 patients, 75%), while within the rivaroxaban group (32 patients, 80%). The average number of MES; in group one were (11.65 ±7.20), and in group two (11.50 ±7.20), with no significant statistical difference also. Conclusion : The effect of warfarin and NOAC use is not statistically different and Rivaroxaban is not inferior to warfarin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非维生素k拮抗剂口服抗凝治疗非瓣膜性房颤的经颅多普勒超声评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of Stroke at University Teaching Hospital of Kara (Togo) in 2022 Advances in Space Navigation Reference System Research Neurocysticercosis at UTH of Kara: Epidemiological, Clinical, Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Evolutive Aspects Role of BDNF-TrkB Signaling in Regulating Anxiety and Depression-Like Behavior in Diverse Brain Regions Non Vitamin k Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation Assessment in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1