The Problem of Theorizing On / Of Sociology and Problematization of Sociological Theory

A. Golikov
{"title":"The Problem of Theorizing On / Of Sociology and Problematization of Sociological Theory","authors":"A. Golikov","doi":"10.26565/2227-6521-2020-45-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the problems of theorizing in modern sociology, limitations and problems that sociologists face when building a sociological theory in modern conditions. Author explores the different modes of practice and reproduction of theory in academic sociology. Problems of the status of theory in modern sociology, its academic, didactic and social representations are analyzed. It is emphasized that the service, subordinate, limited position of fundamental interpretations in the modern sociology’s structure is dangerous for the (re)production of sociology as it is. Author classifies and analyses typical practices and structures of the use and (re)production of fundamental theory in modern sociological science. A special emphasis is made on the study of the didactic aspects of theorizing both in the classroom and outside it. Here, the most important plot is the connection between university education as the production of a universal human image, on the one hand, and theoretical, generalizing, abstractive thinking – on the other. In addition, an important aspect is the problem of social and disciplinary identity of sociology, its use of conceptual, categorical and methodological arsenal in arguing its autonomy and epistemological legitimacy. The possibilities of developing the theoretical tools of sociology from the standpoint of the production of plurality as a condition of its systemic development are investigated. Ideological, educational, socialization, communicative functions of the fundamental theory are underlined. The conclusion about the possibilities and limitations of fundamental theorizing in sociology in modern social and epistemological conditions is formulated.","PeriodicalId":52798,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Psikhologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6521-2020-45-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems of theorizing in modern sociology, limitations and problems that sociologists face when building a sociological theory in modern conditions. Author explores the different modes of practice and reproduction of theory in academic sociology. Problems of the status of theory in modern sociology, its academic, didactic and social representations are analyzed. It is emphasized that the service, subordinate, limited position of fundamental interpretations in the modern sociology’s structure is dangerous for the (re)production of sociology as it is. Author classifies and analyses typical practices and structures of the use and (re)production of fundamental theory in modern sociological science. A special emphasis is made on the study of the didactic aspects of theorizing both in the classroom and outside it. Here, the most important plot is the connection between university education as the production of a universal human image, on the one hand, and theoretical, generalizing, abstractive thinking – on the other. In addition, an important aspect is the problem of social and disciplinary identity of sociology, its use of conceptual, categorical and methodological arsenal in arguing its autonomy and epistemological legitimacy. The possibilities of developing the theoretical tools of sociology from the standpoint of the production of plurality as a condition of its systemic development are investigated. Ideological, educational, socialization, communicative functions of the fundamental theory are underlined. The conclusion about the possibilities and limitations of fundamental theorizing in sociology in modern social and epistemological conditions is formulated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会学的理论化问题与社会学理论的问题化
本文分析了现代社会学理论化的问题,以及社会学家在现代条件下建构社会学理论所面临的局限和问题。作者探讨了学术社会学理论的不同实践模式和再生产模式。分析了理论在现代社会学中的地位、学术地位、教学地位和社会地位等问题。强调基础解释在现代社会学结构中的服务地位、从属地位和有限地位对社会学的(再)生产是危险的。作者对现代社会科学基础理论运用(再)生产的典型实践和结构进行了分类和分析。特别强调的是对课堂内外理论化的教学方面的研究。在这里,最重要的情节是大学教育作为一种普遍的人类形象的产生与理论的、概括的、抽象的思维之间的联系。此外,一个重要的方面是社会学的社会和学科认同问题,它在争论其自主性和认识论合法性时使用概念,范畴和方法武器库。从多元化生产作为其系统发展的条件的角度出发,探讨了发展社会学理论工具的可能性。强调了基础理论的思想、教育、社会化、交际功能。提出了在现代社会和认识论条件下社会学基础理论化的可能性和局限性的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Features of interpersonal relationships in adolescents with internet addiction Creative productivity of ukrainian artists in the conditions of war Mental states dynamics in civilians during the war in Ukraine Psychometric indicators and adaptation ch. Osgud's method "semantic differential" (ukrainian version of the method Studying the relationship between meditation and mindfulness, dissociative manifestations, and emotional intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1