Comparing Effects of Sugammadex and Neostigmine on Postoperative Bowel Movements After Laparotomic Gynecological Operations

F. Çiftçi, M. Aldemir, Y. Demiraran
{"title":"Comparing Effects of Sugammadex and Neostigmine on Postoperative Bowel Movements After Laparotomic Gynecological Operations","authors":"F. Çiftçi, M. Aldemir, Y. Demiraran","doi":"10.5336/ANESTHE.2018-61810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABS TRACT Objective: Gastrointestinal system dysfunction is a common postoperative complication. Especially after abdominal surgery it extends the length of stay in the hospital causing morbidity. Sugammadex is a drug being used in anesthesia routine which binds to steroid formed nondepolarizing muscle relaxants with high affinity and antagonizes neuromuscular block by a completely different mechanism from neostigmine which cause cholinesterase inhibition. We aimed to investigate the effect of sugammadex and neostigmine on return of bowel movements in the postoperative period. Material and Methods: 60 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I, II aged between 18 and 65 years who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and myomectomy operations under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups (Sugammadex, Group S, Neostigmine, Group N). Before the operation. Group S received 2 mg /kg sugammadex after spontaneous respiratory effort after operation, group N received 0.015 mg /kg atropine followed by 0.3 mg /kg neostigmine. Patients were examined by an independent physician at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours postoperatively with a stethoscope for bowel movement. Patients gas release and defecation time were noted. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of demographic characteristics and total surgery time. Total anesthesia time was observed to be significantly shorter in group S. There was no difference between the groups in terms of the first gas extraction time, defecation time and patient discharge time. Conclusion: As a result, there was no difference between sugammadex and neostigmine in terms of returning time of postoperative bowel movements.","PeriodicalId":23442,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Anesthesiology Reanimation","volume":"44 1","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Anesthesiology Reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/ANESTHE.2018-61810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABS TRACT Objective: Gastrointestinal system dysfunction is a common postoperative complication. Especially after abdominal surgery it extends the length of stay in the hospital causing morbidity. Sugammadex is a drug being used in anesthesia routine which binds to steroid formed nondepolarizing muscle relaxants with high affinity and antagonizes neuromuscular block by a completely different mechanism from neostigmine which cause cholinesterase inhibition. We aimed to investigate the effect of sugammadex and neostigmine on return of bowel movements in the postoperative period. Material and Methods: 60 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I, II aged between 18 and 65 years who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and myomectomy operations under general anesthesia were randomized into two groups (Sugammadex, Group S, Neostigmine, Group N). Before the operation. Group S received 2 mg /kg sugammadex after spontaneous respiratory effort after operation, group N received 0.015 mg /kg atropine followed by 0.3 mg /kg neostigmine. Patients were examined by an independent physician at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours postoperatively with a stethoscope for bowel movement. Patients gas release and defecation time were noted. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of demographic characteristics and total surgery time. Total anesthesia time was observed to be significantly shorter in group S. There was no difference between the groups in terms of the first gas extraction time, defecation time and patient discharge time. Conclusion: As a result, there was no difference between sugammadex and neostigmine in terms of returning time of postoperative bowel movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖玛德与新斯的明对妇科剖腹手术后肠蠕动的影响比较
目的:胃肠道功能障碍是术后常见的并发症。特别是腹部手术后,它延长了住院时间,引起发病率。Sugammadex是一种用于麻醉常规的药物,它与类固醇形成的非去极化肌肉松弛剂结合,具有高亲和力,并以与新斯的明完全不同的机制拮抗神经肌肉阻滞,引起胆碱酯酶抑制。我们的目的是研究糖玛德和新斯的明对术后肠蠕动恢复的影响。材料与方法:60例年龄在18 ~ 65岁,被美国麻醉学会(ASA)分类为I、II级的患者,在全麻下行全腹子宫切除术、全腹子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术,随机分为两组(Sugammadex、S组、新斯的明、N组)。S组术后自主呼吸用力后给予糖马酮2 mg /kg, N组术后给予阿托品0.015 mg /kg,新斯的明0.3 mg /kg。术后0、4、8、12、24小时由独立医生用听诊器检查患者的肠蠕动情况。记录患者气体释放量及排便时间。结果:两组患者人口学特征及手术总时间差异无统计学意义。s组总麻醉时间明显缩短,两组间首次抽气时间、排便时间、患者出院时间均无差异。结论:糖马德与新斯的明在术后大便恢复时间上无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Emergency Operations and Anesthesia Preferences in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Before the Pandemic: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Comparison of the LMA Protector and the Baska Mask in Retrograde Ureteroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study Cross-Sectional Analysis of Dental Treatment Procedures Performed Under General Anesthesia or Sedation A Rare Syndrome After Intracranial Hemorrhage Operation: Ogilvie Syndrome Operating Room Employees and Cardiotoxicity: Traditional Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1