Numerical Reproduction of the DeRisk Physical Model Tests on a Bottom-Fixed Foundation Exposed to Uni- and Multi-Directional Storm Sea States

F. Pierella, H. Bredmose, M. Dixen, A. Ghadirian
{"title":"Numerical Reproduction of the DeRisk Physical Model Tests on a Bottom-Fixed Foundation Exposed to Uni- and Multi-Directional Storm Sea States","authors":"F. Pierella, H. Bredmose, M. Dixen, A. Ghadirian","doi":"10.1115/omae2021-65526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this work, we compare the wave and loads statistics for two different sea states with a TP = 15.0[s] on a h = 33.0[m] depth, one with a 10-year return period (HS = 7.5[m]) and one with a 100-year (HS = 9.5[m]). For each sea state, a unidirectional and a multi-directional wave realization was measured experimentally and then reproduced numerically via a fully-nonlinear potential solver. The computed wave kinematics were used to calculate loads on a stiff cylinder with a diameter of D = 7.0[m], and compared with experiments. To perform a quantitative analysis, we extracted 30-minute maxima of the free surface elevation and in-line force, and fitted a Gumbel distribution via a Bayesian methodology. The analysis of the experiments showed that the extreme forcing on a stiff cylinder was larger in the 2D sea state than in the 3D sea state. As for the crest statistics, the 2D were higher than the 3D for the milder storm, while they were quite similar for the stronger storm, likely a consequence of the increased wave breaking, limiting the maximum achievable wave crests. The reproduction of the sea states and associated loads via a fully-nonlinear potential solver was overall able to predict the main trends. However, the 3D wave crests were overestimated for the milder sea state, probably due to a too soft breaking filter. The 2D forces for the larger sea state were on the other hand underestimated, likely due to the lack of a slamming load model. The analysis of the average wave shape leading to the extreme load events showed that in the experiments the extreme events are dominated by physics linked with the particle velocity, and hence in phase with the wave elevation signal, as drag loads, slamming loads and velocity-dependent free-surface intersection loads. On the other hand, in the simulations they are more inertia dominated, hence in phase with the kinematic acceleration signal.","PeriodicalId":23502,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2021-65526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this work, we compare the wave and loads statistics for two different sea states with a TP = 15.0[s] on a h = 33.0[m] depth, one with a 10-year return period (HS = 7.5[m]) and one with a 100-year (HS = 9.5[m]). For each sea state, a unidirectional and a multi-directional wave realization was measured experimentally and then reproduced numerically via a fully-nonlinear potential solver. The computed wave kinematics were used to calculate loads on a stiff cylinder with a diameter of D = 7.0[m], and compared with experiments. To perform a quantitative analysis, we extracted 30-minute maxima of the free surface elevation and in-line force, and fitted a Gumbel distribution via a Bayesian methodology. The analysis of the experiments showed that the extreme forcing on a stiff cylinder was larger in the 2D sea state than in the 3D sea state. As for the crest statistics, the 2D were higher than the 3D for the milder storm, while they were quite similar for the stronger storm, likely a consequence of the increased wave breaking, limiting the maximum achievable wave crests. The reproduction of the sea states and associated loads via a fully-nonlinear potential solver was overall able to predict the main trends. However, the 3D wave crests were overestimated for the milder sea state, probably due to a too soft breaking filter. The 2D forces for the larger sea state were on the other hand underestimated, likely due to the lack of a slamming load model. The analysis of the average wave shape leading to the extreme load events showed that in the experiments the extreme events are dominated by physics linked with the particle velocity, and hence in phase with the wave elevation signal, as drag loads, slamming loads and velocity-dependent free-surface intersection loads. On the other hand, in the simulations they are more inertia dominated, hence in phase with the kinematic acceleration signal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单向和多向风暴海况下底部固定地基风险物理模型试验的数值再现
在这项工作中,我们比较了两种不同海况的波浪和载荷统计数据,其中TP = 15.0[s], h = 33.0[m]深度,一个是10年(HS = 7.5[m]),一个是100年(HS = 9.5[m])。对于每种海况,实验测量了单向和多向波浪实现,然后通过全非线性势解器进行了数值再现。利用计算得到的波浪运动学对直径为D = 7.0[m]的刚性圆柱体进行了载荷计算,并与实验结果进行了比较。为了进行定量分析,我们提取了30分钟内自由表面高度和直线力的最大值,并通过贝叶斯方法拟合了Gumbel分布。实验分析表明,刚性圆柱在二维海况下的极限力大于三维海况下的极限力。至于波峰统计,较温和风暴的2D波峰高于3D波峰,而较强风暴的2D波峰高于3D波峰,这可能是波浪破碎增加的结果,限制了最大可达到的波峰。通过全非线性势解器对海况和相关载荷的再现总体上能够预测主要趋势。然而,对于较温和的海况,三维波峰被高估了,可能是由于太软的破碎过滤器。另一方面,更大海况下的二维力被低估了,可能是由于缺乏撞击载荷模型。对导致极端载荷事件的平均波形分析表明,在实验中,极端载荷事件主要是与粒子速度相关的物理事件,因此与波浪高程信号相一致,如阻力载荷、撞击载荷和与速度相关的自由面交叉载荷。另一方面,在仿真中,它们更多地是惯性主导的,因此与运动加速度信号相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance of the Inertial Components in Modal State Covariances Prelude FLNG Free Weathervaning Heading Prediction and Uncertainties, Based on Machine Learning Model Applying Open Web Architectures Towards Collaborative Maritime Design and Simulation Joint-Industry Effort to Develop and Verify CFD Modeling Practice for Predicting Wave Impact Dynamic Response of a Generic Self-Elevating Unit in Operation With Hull in Water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1