Microbial contamination in dental equipment and disinfection potential of different antimicrobial agents

Stephanie Cezar de Mello Tonello, M. Dutra, G. Pizzolatto, Letícia de Abreu Giacomini, D. J. Corralo
{"title":"Microbial contamination in dental equipment and disinfection potential of different antimicrobial agents","authors":"Stephanie Cezar de Mello Tonello, M. Dutra, G. Pizzolatto, Letícia de Abreu Giacomini, D. J. Corralo","doi":"10.1590/1981-86372022001620200046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the dental equipment microbial contamination and to test different disinfectants, collaborating with the protocols control of cross infection in dental care. Methods: Samples were collected from dental equipment (syringes; auxiliary table; reflector), cultured in Petri plates with Brain Heart Agar (for bacteria) and Sabourad Agar (for fungi) culture medium. After collection of the initial samples, the surfaces were randomly divided and disinfected with the following products: ethanol 70% (A70); 5% chlorhexidine (CHX5) and, glucoprotamina 0.5% (GLP0,5). New sample collections were made from the same locations described above (final samples). Results: No disinfectant product tested was able to eliminate all microbial forms (bacteria and fungi) surfaces. For bacteria, the antimicrobial activity was higher with the ethanol 70%, followed by 5% chlorhexidine and glucoprotamina 0.5%. For fungi, the 5% chlorhexidine had the best effect, followed by ethanol 70% and glucoprotamina 0.5%. Conclusion: The study confirmed the contamination of surfaces of dental equipment and the importance of disinfection for infection control in the dental clinic. Through this study, no antimicrobial agent tested was 100% effective in eliminating microorganisms present in the dental clinic surfaces.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372022001620200046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the dental equipment microbial contamination and to test different disinfectants, collaborating with the protocols control of cross infection in dental care. Methods: Samples were collected from dental equipment (syringes; auxiliary table; reflector), cultured in Petri plates with Brain Heart Agar (for bacteria) and Sabourad Agar (for fungi) culture medium. After collection of the initial samples, the surfaces were randomly divided and disinfected with the following products: ethanol 70% (A70); 5% chlorhexidine (CHX5) and, glucoprotamina 0.5% (GLP0,5). New sample collections were made from the same locations described above (final samples). Results: No disinfectant product tested was able to eliminate all microbial forms (bacteria and fungi) surfaces. For bacteria, the antimicrobial activity was higher with the ethanol 70%, followed by 5% chlorhexidine and glucoprotamina 0.5%. For fungi, the 5% chlorhexidine had the best effect, followed by ethanol 70% and glucoprotamina 0.5%. Conclusion: The study confirmed the contamination of surfaces of dental equipment and the importance of disinfection for infection control in the dental clinic. Through this study, no antimicrobial agent tested was 100% effective in eliminating microorganisms present in the dental clinic surfaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔设备中的微生物污染及不同抗菌剂的消毒潜力
摘要目的:分析口腔设备微生物污染情况,对不同消毒剂进行检测,配合口腔护理交叉感染控制方案。方法:口腔器械(注射器;辅助表;反射镜),在培养皿中用Brain Heart琼脂(细菌)和Sabourad琼脂(真菌)培养基培养。初始样品采集后,随机分表面并用以下产品消毒:70%乙醇(A70);5%氯己定(CHX5)和0.5%糖蛋白(GLP0,5)。从上述相同的位置采集新的样品(最终样品)。结果:没有一种消毒剂能消除所有表面微生物(细菌和真菌)。对细菌的抑菌活性在乙醇含量为70%时最高,其次为5%氯己定和0.5%糖原蛋白。对于真菌,5%的氯己定效果最好,其次是70%的乙醇和0.5%的糖蛋白。结论:本研究证实了口腔门诊设备表面污染情况及消毒对控制感染的重要性。通过这项研究,没有一种抗菌药物测试是100%有效地消除存在于牙科诊所表面的微生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sleep disorders are associated with both morning temporal and jaw pain among adults and elderly: a population-based study in Brazil Radiolucent image in lower third molar: hidden caries or pre-eruptive resorption?: a case report Edentulism and number of medications are associated with nutritional status in older adults: a population-based cross-sectional study Fluoride in Mozambique: retrospective study Evidence-practice gap in treatment recommendations for proximal caries among Brazilian dentists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1