Demystifying Collapse: Climate, environment, and social agency in pre-modern societies

Q4 Social Sciences Millennium DIPr Pub Date : 2020-11-09 DOI:10.1515/mill-2020-0002
J. Haldon, Arlen F. Chase, W. Eastwood, M. Medina‐Elizalde, A. Izdebski, F. Ludlow, G. Middleton, Lee Mordechai, Jason Nesbitt, B. Turner
{"title":"Demystifying Collapse: Climate, environment, and social agency in pre-modern societies","authors":"J. Haldon, Arlen F. Chase, W. Eastwood, M. Medina‐Elizalde, A. Izdebski, F. Ludlow, G. Middleton, Lee Mordechai, Jason Nesbitt, B. Turner","doi":"10.1515/mill-2020-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Collapse is a term that has attracted much attention in social science literature in recent years, but there remain substantial areas of disagreement about how it should be understood in historical contexts. More specifically, the use of the term collapse often merely serves to dramatize long-past events, to push human actors into the background, and to mystify the past intellectually. At the same time, since human societies are complex systems, the alternative involves grasping the challenges that a holistic analysis presents, taking account of the many different levels and paces at which societies function, and developing appropriate methods that help to integrate science and history. Often neglected elements in considerations of collapse are the perceptions and beliefs of a historical society and how a given society deals with change; an important facet of this, almost entirely ignored in the discussion, is the understanding of time held by the individuals and social groups affected by change; and from this perspective ‘collapse’ depends very much on perception, including the perceptions of the modern commentator. With this in mind, this article challenges simplistic notions of ‘collapse’ in an effort to encourage a more nuanced understanding of the impact and process of both social and environmental change on past human societies.","PeriodicalId":36600,"journal":{"name":"Millennium DIPr","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium DIPr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mill-2020-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Collapse is a term that has attracted much attention in social science literature in recent years, but there remain substantial areas of disagreement about how it should be understood in historical contexts. More specifically, the use of the term collapse often merely serves to dramatize long-past events, to push human actors into the background, and to mystify the past intellectually. At the same time, since human societies are complex systems, the alternative involves grasping the challenges that a holistic analysis presents, taking account of the many different levels and paces at which societies function, and developing appropriate methods that help to integrate science and history. Often neglected elements in considerations of collapse are the perceptions and beliefs of a historical society and how a given society deals with change; an important facet of this, almost entirely ignored in the discussion, is the understanding of time held by the individuals and social groups affected by change; and from this perspective ‘collapse’ depends very much on perception, including the perceptions of the modern commentator. With this in mind, this article challenges simplistic notions of ‘collapse’ in an effort to encourage a more nuanced understanding of the impact and process of both social and environmental change on past human societies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭开崩溃的神秘面纱:前现代社会的气候、环境和社会机构
摘要崩溃是近年来在社会科学文献中引起广泛关注的一个术语,但关于如何在历史背景下理解它,仍然存在很大的分歧。更具体地说,使用“崩溃”一词通常只是为了戏剧化很久以前的事件,将人类行动者推到背景中,并在智力上神秘化过去。与此同时,由于人类社会是复杂的系统,另一种选择包括把握整体分析所带来的挑战,考虑到社会运作的许多不同层次和速度,并制定有助于整合科学和历史的适当方法。在考虑崩溃时,经常被忽视的因素是对历史社会的看法和信仰,以及特定社会如何应对变化;在讨论中几乎完全忽略的一个重要方面是受变化影响的个人和社会群体对时间的理解;从这个角度来看,“崩溃”在很大程度上取决于感知,包括现代评论家的感知。考虑到这一点,本文挑战了简单的“崩溃”概念,以鼓励对社会和环境变化对过去人类社会的影响和过程有更细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Millennium DIPr
Millennium DIPr Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Pollen, brooches, solidi and Restgermanen, or today’s Poland in the Migration Period Pollen, brooches, solidi and Restgermanen, or today’s Poland in the Migration Period Phaedrus und Martial: Zur Interaktion von Versfabel und Epigrammatik Prokop, ein glaubwürdiger Berichterstatter? Der Gotenkrieg im Ager Gallicus und im Picenum und seine Auswirkungen auf die Region Towards a History of Syriac Rhetoric in Late Antiquity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1