Acupuncture and moxibustion treating lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Zhe Chen, Tao Jiang, Yingying Peng, Xiaoyu Qiang, Fengwen Yang, Haiyin Hu, Chunxiang Liu, Myeong Soo Lee
{"title":"Acupuncture and moxibustion treating lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Zhe Chen, Tao Jiang, Yingying Peng, Xiaoyu Qiang, Fengwen Yang, Haiyin Hu, Chunxiang Liu, Myeong Soo Lee","doi":"10.1097/HM9.0000000000000029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) affect the quality of life of elderly individuals. Acupuncture and moxibustion are used in the clinic in China for improving LUTS symptoms due to BPH. However, there is no evidence to suggest which is the best option. We compared the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion to provide evidence for clinical decision-making. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data, and VIP databases were searched from inception to July 2020 to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture and moxibustion for LUTS due to BPH. Two researchers filtered studies and extracted the information independently. This study conducted a network meta-analysis using the Bayesian random method. The interventions ranking was evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: We finally included 40 studies comprising 10 treating therapies and 3655 patients with LUTS caused by BPH. In terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and quality of life, electroacupuncture (EA) (MD = −3.6, 95% credible interval [CrI] [−5.5, −1.8], very low certainty of evidence; MD = 2.2, 95% CrI [1.1, 3.3], low certainty of evidence; MD = −1.3, 95% CrI [−2.2, −0.43], very low certainty of evidence) may be consistently the optimal treatment compared with other interventions, with SUCRA values of 84%, 81%, and 89%, respectively. Conclusions: Of all treatments, EA may have the best efficacy with fewer adverse events for LUTS due to BPH. The quality of evidence supporting this result is low to very low certainty of the evidence due to limitations of primary studies; thus, more high-quality RCTs are needed for further evidence.","PeriodicalId":93856,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture and herbal medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":"84 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture and herbal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HM9.0000000000000029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) affect the quality of life of elderly individuals. Acupuncture and moxibustion are used in the clinic in China for improving LUTS symptoms due to BPH. However, there is no evidence to suggest which is the best option. We compared the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion to provide evidence for clinical decision-making. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data, and VIP databases were searched from inception to July 2020 to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture and moxibustion for LUTS due to BPH. Two researchers filtered studies and extracted the information independently. This study conducted a network meta-analysis using the Bayesian random method. The interventions ranking was evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: We finally included 40 studies comprising 10 treating therapies and 3655 patients with LUTS caused by BPH. In terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and quality of life, electroacupuncture (EA) (MD = −3.6, 95% credible interval [CrI] [−5.5, −1.8], very low certainty of evidence; MD = 2.2, 95% CrI [1.1, 3.3], low certainty of evidence; MD = −1.3, 95% CrI [−2.2, −0.43], very low certainty of evidence) may be consistently the optimal treatment compared with other interventions, with SUCRA values of 84%, 81%, and 89%, respectively. Conclusions: Of all treatments, EA may have the best efficacy with fewer adverse events for LUTS due to BPH. The quality of evidence supporting this result is low to very low certainty of the evidence due to limitations of primary studies; thus, more high-quality RCTs are needed for further evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针灸治疗良性前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
摘要目的:良性前列腺增生(BPH)引起的下尿路症状(LUTS)影响老年人的生活质量。针灸在中国临床上用于改善前列腺增生引起的LUTS症状。然而,没有证据表明哪一个是最好的选择。我们比较针刺和艾灸的疗效,为临床决策提供依据。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据和VIP数据库,检索自建库至2020年7月的针灸治疗BPH合并LUTS的随机对照试验(rct)。两名研究人员对研究进行筛选,并独立提取信息。本研究采用贝叶斯随机方法进行网络元分析。采用累积排序曲线下曲面(SUCRA)评价干预措施的排序。结果:我们最终纳入了40项研究,包括10种治疗方法和3655例由BPH引起的LUTS患者。在国际前列腺症状评分、最大尿流率和生活质量方面,电针(EA) (MD =−3.6,95%可信区间[CrI][−5.5,−1.8],证据确定性非常低;MD = 2.2, 95% CrI[1.1, 3.3],证据确定性低;MD = - 1.3, 95% CrI[- 2.2, - 0.43],证据确定性极低)与其他干预措施相比,可能始终是最佳治疗方法,SUCRA值分别为84%,81%和89%。结论:在所有治疗方法中,EA可能对BPH引起的LUTS疗效最好,不良事件较少。由于初步研究的局限性,支持这一结果的证据质量很低,证据的确定性很低;因此,需要更多高质量的随机对照试验来获得进一步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New Perspective on the Treatment of Rheumatic Arthritis Based on “Strengthening Body Resistance (Fú Zhèng)” in the Theory of Co-inhibitory Receptor-regulated T-Cell Immunity Formulations of traditional Chinese medicine for the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced injury The Role of Ginseng as an Anti-Asthmatic Agent Research progress on the toxicity of Asari Radix et Rhizoma Dual effects of Psoraleae Fructus on the liver: hepatoprotection or hepatoxicity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1