Two- Year Survival Analysis and Factors influencing Survival of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Yasmine F. Siregar, S. Kasiman, Z. Safri, H. Hasan, Abdul H. Reynaldo, F. Habib
{"title":"Two- Year Survival Analysis and Factors influencing Survival of Acute Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Yasmine F. Siregar, S. Kasiman, Z. Safri, H. Hasan, Abdul H. Reynaldo, F. Habib","doi":"10.20902/ijptr.2019.120204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has less frequent complications, but has worse long-term prognosis than ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Mortality rates of NSTEMI were lower than STEMI but after 6 months both mortality were similar. The purpose of this study was to determine the 2-year survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Method: This cohort retrospective study included 264 AMI patients treated from January – December 2015 in H. Adam Malik Medan General Hospital. The study sample was divided based on the diagnosis of STEMI and NSTEMI. Data were obtained from medical records. All patients were contacted by phone to determine their condition 2 years after experiencing AMI. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the factors that affect the survival. The 2-year survival of STEMI and NSTEMI was compared using the Kaplan Meier plot.Result: From 264 patients, there were 216 (81.8%) men with median age of 56 years. We found 147 STEMI patients and 117 NSTEMI patients. NSTEMI group tended to have history of coronary artery disease, higher blood pressure, less revascularization, longer hospitalization days and less number of post AMI complications. Survival and mortality rates in 2 years were 58% and 28%. Multivariate analysis showed higher blood pressure (OR 1.023, CI 95%, 1.003 – 1.044) dan PCI during hospitalization (OR 8.604, CI 95%, 2.264 – 32.702) showed better 2-year survival. There were no significant 2-year survival differences between the two groups (log rank 0.136). Better 2-year survival was found in patients with single vessel disease (log rank 0.001), patients who received revascularization (log rank 0.001) and patients who did not experience heart failure or cardiogenic shock during hospitalization (log rank 0.001). Conclusion: There was no difference in 2-year survival between STEMI and NSTEMI patients who were admitted to H. Adam Malik Medan General Hospital in 2015. The 2-year survival appeared better in patients with single vessel disease, received revascularization and did not experience heart failure or cardiogenic shock during hospitalization. Keyword: survival, mortality, STEMI, NSTEMI. Yasmine F. Siregar et al /International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2019,12(2): 119127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20902/IJPTR.2019.120204 International Journal of PharmTech Research CODEN (USA): IJPRIF, ISSN: 0974-4304, ISSN(Online): 2455-9563 Vol.12, No.02, pp 119-127, 2019 Yasmine F. Siregar et al /International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2019,12(2): 119-127. 120","PeriodicalId":14252,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of PharmTech Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of PharmTech Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20902/ijptr.2019.120204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has less frequent complications, but has worse long-term prognosis than ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Mortality rates of NSTEMI were lower than STEMI but after 6 months both mortality were similar. The purpose of this study was to determine the 2-year survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Method: This cohort retrospective study included 264 AMI patients treated from January – December 2015 in H. Adam Malik Medan General Hospital. The study sample was divided based on the diagnosis of STEMI and NSTEMI. Data were obtained from medical records. All patients were contacted by phone to determine their condition 2 years after experiencing AMI. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the factors that affect the survival. The 2-year survival of STEMI and NSTEMI was compared using the Kaplan Meier plot.Result: From 264 patients, there were 216 (81.8%) men with median age of 56 years. We found 147 STEMI patients and 117 NSTEMI patients. NSTEMI group tended to have history of coronary artery disease, higher blood pressure, less revascularization, longer hospitalization days and less number of post AMI complications. Survival and mortality rates in 2 years were 58% and 28%. Multivariate analysis showed higher blood pressure (OR 1.023, CI 95%, 1.003 – 1.044) dan PCI during hospitalization (OR 8.604, CI 95%, 2.264 – 32.702) showed better 2-year survival. There were no significant 2-year survival differences between the two groups (log rank 0.136). Better 2-year survival was found in patients with single vessel disease (log rank 0.001), patients who received revascularization (log rank 0.001) and patients who did not experience heart failure or cardiogenic shock during hospitalization (log rank 0.001). Conclusion: There was no difference in 2-year survival between STEMI and NSTEMI patients who were admitted to H. Adam Malik Medan General Hospital in 2015. The 2-year survival appeared better in patients with single vessel disease, received revascularization and did not experience heart failure or cardiogenic shock during hospitalization. Keyword: survival, mortality, STEMI, NSTEMI. Yasmine F. Siregar et al /International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2019,12(2): 119127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20902/IJPTR.2019.120204 International Journal of PharmTech Research CODEN (USA): IJPRIF, ISSN: 0974-4304, ISSN(Online): 2455-9563 Vol.12, No.02, pp 119-127, 2019 Yasmine F. Siregar et al /International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2019,12(2): 119-127. 120
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性心肌梗死患者2年生存分析及影响生存的因素
背景:非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)并发症发生率较低,但远期预后较ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)差。NSTEMI的死亡率低于STEMI,但6个月后两者的死亡率相似。本研究的目的是确定急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的2年生存率。方法:对2015年1 - 12月在棉兰总医院就诊的264例AMI患者进行队列回顾性研究。根据STEMI和NSTEMI的诊断分为研究样本。数据来自医疗记录。通过电话联系所有患者,以确定AMI发生2年后的病情。通过多因素分析评估影响患者生存的因素。使用Kaplan Meier图比较STEMI和NSTEMI的2年生存率。结果:264例患者中,男性216例(81.8%),中位年龄56岁。STEMI患者147例,NSTEMI患者117例。NSTEMI组有冠状动脉病史,血压较高,血运重建术较少,住院天数较长,AMI后并发症较少。2年生存率为58%,死亡率为28%。多因素分析显示,住院期间血压升高(OR 1.023, CI 95%, 1.003 ~ 1.044)和PCI (OR 8.604, CI 95%, 2.264 ~ 32.702)可提高2年生存率。两组2年生存率无显著差异(log rank 0.136)。单血管疾病患者(log rank 0.001)、接受血运重建术患者(log rank 0.001)和住院期间未发生心力衰竭或心源性休克的患者(log rank 0.001)的2年生存率更高。结论:2015年入住H. Adam Malik Medan总医院的STEMI和NSTEMI患者的2年生存率无差异。单血管疾病、接受血运重建术且住院期间未发生心力衰竭或心源性休克的患者的2年生存率更高。关键词:生存率,死亡率,STEMI, NSTEMI。张建军,张建军,张建军,等。中国生物医学工程学报,2016,32(2):1177 - 1177。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20902/IJPTR.2019.120204 International Journal of PharmTech Research CODEN (USA): IJPRIF, ISSN: 0974-4304, ISSN(Online): 2455-9563 Vol.12, No.02, pp 119-127, 2019 Yasmine F. Siregar等/International Journal of PharmTech Research, 2019,12(2): 119-127。120
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phytochemical Characterization of Natural Dye Extracted from Senna siamea Pods Azo benzimidazole - A biologically active scaffold Effect of Drying Temperatures on Chemical compounds and Antioxidant properties of Vitex negundo leaves A Review on unexplored Plants for Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis Formulation and Evaluation of Roflumilast Fast dissolving Tablets employing Lepidium sativum mucilage using 23 Factorial design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1