THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PROGRAM BASED ON RATIONAL EMOTIONAL BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING TO REDUCE THE LEARNED HELPLESSNESS OF THE PHYSICALLY DISABLED IN RIYADH

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.54615/2231-7805.47218
Muna Bint Saqr Al-Damikh, Yahya bin Mubarak Khatatbah
{"title":"THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PROGRAM BASED ON RATIONAL EMOTIONAL BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING TO REDUCE THE LEARNED HELPLESSNESS OF THE PHYSICALLY DISABLED IN RIYADH","authors":"Muna Bint Saqr Al-Damikh, Yahya bin Mubarak Khatatbah","doi":"10.54615/2231-7805.47218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to find out the effectiveness of a program based on rational emotional behavioural counselling in reducing the learned helplessness of the physically disabled in Riyadh. The researchers used the quasi-experimental approach based on the experimental design. Moreover, the study relied on two tools, namely, the Learned Helplessness Scale, prepared by Quinless et al. translated by the researchers, and a rational, emotional, behavioural, counselling program. The study sample included 20 young people with motor disabilities, equally divided into two main groups, namely, (experimental and control). Their ages ranged between (20-30) years. Moreover, the results of this study reflected that there were obvious statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental and control group members in the level of learned helplessness, after applying the program sessions based on rational, emotional, behavioural counselling. Such differences were related to and in favour of the experimental group. It was also found that there are statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group in the level of learned helplessness, before and after the application of the program based on rational, emotional, behavioural counselling. These differences were in favour of the post-test. Finally, the results reflected the existence of statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group in the learned helplessness between the two tests; the post-test and the Follow-up test, of the program based on rational, emotional and behavioural counselling. These differences were in favour of the Follow-up application. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 22(8) October, 2021; 1-22.","PeriodicalId":43558,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54615/2231-7805.47218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aimed to find out the effectiveness of a program based on rational emotional behavioural counselling in reducing the learned helplessness of the physically disabled in Riyadh. The researchers used the quasi-experimental approach based on the experimental design. Moreover, the study relied on two tools, namely, the Learned Helplessness Scale, prepared by Quinless et al. translated by the researchers, and a rational, emotional, behavioural, counselling program. The study sample included 20 young people with motor disabilities, equally divided into two main groups, namely, (experimental and control). Their ages ranged between (20-30) years. Moreover, the results of this study reflected that there were obvious statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental and control group members in the level of learned helplessness, after applying the program sessions based on rational, emotional, behavioural counselling. Such differences were related to and in favour of the experimental group. It was also found that there are statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group in the level of learned helplessness, before and after the application of the program based on rational, emotional, behavioural counselling. These differences were in favour of the post-test. Finally, the results reflected the existence of statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the experimental group in the learned helplessness between the two tests; the post-test and the Follow-up test, of the program based on rational, emotional and behavioural counselling. These differences were in favour of the Follow-up application. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 22(8) October, 2021; 1-22.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在利雅得,一个基于理性情感行为咨询的项目在减少肢体残疾者的习得性无助方面的有效性
本研究旨在找出一个基于理性情绪行为咨询的项目在减少利雅得肢体残疾者的习得性无助方面的有效性。研究人员在实验设计的基础上采用了准实验方法。此外,该研究依赖于两种工具,即由Quinless等人编写的习得性无助量表,由研究人员翻译,以及理性,情感,行为,咨询程序。研究样本包括20名有运动障碍的年轻人,平均分为两组,即实验组和对照组。他们的年龄在20-30岁之间。此外,本研究的结果显示,实验组和对照组成员在应用基于理性、情感、行为咨询的课程课程后,习得性无助水平的平均分有明显的统计学差异。这些差异与实验组有关,并有利于实验组。同时发现,在应用基于理性、情感、行为咨询的方案前后,实验组的习得性无助水平平均得分存在统计学差异。这些差异有利于后测。最后,结果反映实验组的习得性无助平均得分在两项测试之间存在显著的统计学差异;基于理性、情感和行为咨询的项目后测试和后续测试。这些差异有利于后续应用。东盟精神病学杂志,第22卷(8),2021年10月;22页。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Assess the Level of Stress among the Staff Nurse Working in Saveetha Medical College and Hospital during Covid-19 Pandemic ASSESSMENT OF STRESS AMONG SECOND YEAR STUDENTS AT MICHAEL CHILUFYA SATA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON OLDER ADULTS' FINANCES, WELL-BEING AND FEAR DEPRESSION AS THE ONLY ACUTE MANIFESTATION OF A THALAMIC STROKE: CASE REPORT THE INFLUENCE OF TRAIT ANXIETY ON CAREER SELF-MANAGEMENT AND THE MODERATOR EFFECT OF STATE ANXIETY ABOUT LAYOFFS DUE TO COVID 19 PANDEMIC AMONG WHITE-COLLAR EMPLOYEES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1