Computer Vision for Visual Arts Collections:

IF 0.2 0 ART Art Documentation Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1086/716730
J. Craig
{"title":"Computer Vision for Visual Arts Collections:","authors":"J. Craig","doi":"10.1086/716730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning is becoming commonplace for visual arts libraries, archives, and museums (LAMs). In particular, computer vision, a distinct form of machine learning, has been used in arts-based LAMs to automate digital image analysis through trained algorithms to increase metadata description and collection accessibility. Linkage of LAMs with AI may seem logical, as the emerging technologies are well suited to process and analyze sizable amounts of information, such as the data held by large collection repositories. However, as interest in computer vision develops among those in the library and information science (LIS) field, there are important concerns to address. Machine-learning algorithms used in computer vision are known to reflect bias, lack transparency, and significantly impact labor. How can LAMs, as institutions dedicated to equity and access, confront these potentially harmful aspects of computer vision? Through analysis of recent case studies, accounts, and literature, this article proposes that visual arts LAMs can mitigate algorithmic bias by promoting transparency of computer vision models, demonstrating caution, and establishing accountability. The development of capable workforces in LIS through the implementation of education and collaboration is also critical to alleviate outsourcing and temporary labor. [This article is a revision of the paper that won the 2021 Gerd Muehsam Award. The award recognizes excellence in a paper written by a graduate student on a topic relevant to art librarianship or visual resources curatorship.]","PeriodicalId":43009,"journal":{"name":"Art Documentation","volume":"14 1","pages":"198 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning is becoming commonplace for visual arts libraries, archives, and museums (LAMs). In particular, computer vision, a distinct form of machine learning, has been used in arts-based LAMs to automate digital image analysis through trained algorithms to increase metadata description and collection accessibility. Linkage of LAMs with AI may seem logical, as the emerging technologies are well suited to process and analyze sizable amounts of information, such as the data held by large collection repositories. However, as interest in computer vision develops among those in the library and information science (LIS) field, there are important concerns to address. Machine-learning algorithms used in computer vision are known to reflect bias, lack transparency, and significantly impact labor. How can LAMs, as institutions dedicated to equity and access, confront these potentially harmful aspects of computer vision? Through analysis of recent case studies, accounts, and literature, this article proposes that visual arts LAMs can mitigate algorithmic bias by promoting transparency of computer vision models, demonstrating caution, and establishing accountability. The development of capable workforces in LIS through the implementation of education and collaboration is also critical to alleviate outsourcing and temporary labor. [This article is a revision of the paper that won the 2021 Gerd Muehsam Award. The award recognizes excellence in a paper written by a graduate student on a topic relevant to art librarianship or visual resources curatorship.]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉艺术收藏的计算机视觉:
人工智能(AI)和机器学习的实施在视觉艺术图书馆、档案馆和博物馆(lam)中变得越来越普遍。特别是,计算机视觉,一种独特的机器学习形式,已被用于基于艺术的lam中,通过训练有素的算法自动进行数字图像分析,以增加元数据描述和收集的可访问性。lam与人工智能的联系似乎是合乎逻辑的,因为新兴技术非常适合处理和分析大量信息,例如大型集合存储库所持有的数据。然而,随着计算机视觉在图书馆与信息科学(LIS)领域的兴趣的发展,有一些重要的问题需要解决。众所周知,计算机视觉中使用的机器学习算法会反映偏见,缺乏透明度,并对劳动力产生重大影响。作为致力于公平和获取的机构,LAMs如何应对计算机视觉的这些潜在有害方面?通过对最近的案例研究、账目和文献的分析,本文提出视觉艺术lam可以通过提高计算机视觉模型的透明度、展示谨慎性和建立问责制来减轻算法偏见。通过实施教育和合作,在LIS培养有能力的劳动力对于减少外包和临时劳动力也至关重要。这篇文章是对获得2021年格尔德·穆赫萨姆奖的论文的修改。该奖项旨在表彰研究生就艺术图书馆或视觉资源策展相关主题撰写的优秀论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Medhat-Lecocq, Héba (2021) : Terminologie comparée et traduction. Approche interdisciplinaire. Paris : Éditions des archives contemporaines, 260 p. Tao, Li and Kaibao, Hu (2021): Reappraising Self and Others: A Corpus-Based Study of Chinese Political Discourse in English Translation. Singapore: Springer, 194 p. Hartmann, Esa et Hersant, Patrick, dir. (2019) : Au miroir de la traduction. Avant-texte, intratexte, paratexte. Multilinguisme. Paris : Éditions des archives contemporaines, 228 p. Caliendo, Giuditta et Oster, Corinne (2020) : Traduire la criminalité : Perspectives traductologiques et discursives. Lille : Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 260 p. Pajević, Marko (2019): The Henri Meschonnic Reader: A Poetics of Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 320 p.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1