Deriving Truths From Literature

L. B. Cebik
{"title":"Deriving Truths From Literature","authors":"L. B. Cebik","doi":"10.5840/SWJPHIL198011115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this short paper, I shall review the major attempts to supply epistemic respectability to literature. All share two common features: first they do not work, and second, they all attempt to derive the truths we prize directly from the work of literature. Reacting to these features, I shall review an account which permits an indirect derivation of truth from literature. Desirably, this account will be consistent with the logical criteria of interpretations of literature. Undesirably, the account brings to an end the myth that literature can in any straightforward way provide us with new truths. The question of deriving truths from literature is related to another question: whether the statements of literature are propositional, that is, capable of truth or falsity. This latter question acquires importance only because the notion of derivation demands a propositional starting point if the so-called \"truths\" to be derived are to have sense. Writers such as Mellor would have the sentences of","PeriodicalId":83275,"journal":{"name":"The Southwestern journal of philosophy","volume":"9 1","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southwestern journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/SWJPHIL198011115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this short paper, I shall review the major attempts to supply epistemic respectability to literature. All share two common features: first they do not work, and second, they all attempt to derive the truths we prize directly from the work of literature. Reacting to these features, I shall review an account which permits an indirect derivation of truth from literature. Desirably, this account will be consistent with the logical criteria of interpretations of literature. Undesirably, the account brings to an end the myth that literature can in any straightforward way provide us with new truths. The question of deriving truths from literature is related to another question: whether the statements of literature are propositional, that is, capable of truth or falsity. This latter question acquires importance only because the notion of derivation demands a propositional starting point if the so-called "truths" to be derived are to have sense. Writers such as Mellor would have the sentences of
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从文学中获得真理
在这篇短文中,我将回顾为文学提供认识论上的尊重的主要尝试。它们都有两个共同的特点:第一,它们不起作用;第二,它们都试图直接从文学作品中获得我们所珍视的真理。针对这些特点,我将回顾一种允许从文学中间接推导真理的叙述。理想的情况是,这种解释将与文学解释的逻辑标准相一致。令人不快的是,这种叙述终结了文学可以以任何直接的方式为我们提供新的真理的神话。从文学中得出真理的问题与另一个问题有关:文学的陈述是否具有命题性,也就是说,是否有真假的能力。后一个问题之所以重要,只是因为推导的概念要求有一个命题的起点,才能使所推导的所谓真理具有意义。像梅勒这样的作家会用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychology: A New Way into Transcendental Phenomenology?: Some Thoughts on Husserl’s Last Part of the Crisis Nietzsche, Volume I: The Will to Power as Art The Development of Heidegger’s Concept of the Thing Husserl’s Relations to British Empiricism Heidegger and the Problem of Being-With
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1